|
|
|
| Evolution of Relationship Between Government and Sci-tech Association since the Founding of P.R.C:A Framework of Policy Analysis Based on Punctuated-equilibrium |
| Xu Wanqiang1,2,Zhang Ting1 |
| (1.College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074, China; 2.School of Emergency Management,Henan Polytechnic University,Jiaozuo 454003, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As the basic carrier for the party and the government to organize and unite the masses of scientific and technological workers, the sci-tech association plays multiple functions in promoting the systematization, synergy and institutionalization of scientific and technological innovation talent teams, facilitating the creation, flow and use of scientific knowledge, and deepening the reform of the administrative management system. The research on the relationship between the government and the sci-tech association has always been the focus of scholars, and the related research has formed a certain theoretical system. However, most of the studies show a "fragmented" feature due to the static description of key events or single cases within a fixed time period, and lack of consideration of diversity in different historical periods and systems based on the diachronic backgrounds. The analytical framework of relevant research has also been stuck in the traditional perspective for a long time, lacking innovation based on new theory or analytical framework. The punctuated-equilibrium theory describes the phenomenon of discontinuity and equilibrium in the process of public policy with the distribution of time series and policy changes. It is one of the important theories of public policy process.Thus this paper attempts to use the punctuated-equilibrium theory to break through the limitations of existing research, investigate the change process of Chinese sci-tech association policy since the founding of P.R.C, verify the nonlinear characteristics of the punctuated equilibrium of sci-tech association policy, andexplore the dynamic mechanism of the relationship between the Chinese government and sci-tech association. #br#After sorting out 107 relevant policy texts of Chinese sci-tech association since the founding of the P.R.C, it is concluded that the policy of sci-tech association has the characteristics of punctuated and equilibrium alternating progression. According to the changes of policy tools, policy tool settings and policy goals and the policy evolution stage of sci-tech association, this paper divides the evolution map of the relationship between the government and sci-tech association since the founding of P.R.C into six punctuated equilibrium periods: the exploration equilibrium period, the strong intermittent period, the weak intermittent period, the exploration equilibrium period, the development equilibrium period and the perfect equilibrium period. Furthermore, in order to investigate the driving factors behind the punctuated equilibrium of sci-tech association policy, this paper adjusts and revises the influencing factors of the punctuated-equilibrium model under the background of western public policy. It is found that the attention distribution of central government decision-making, the impact of focus events and the strategic action of sci-tech association are the main factors that causes the change of sci-tech association policy.#br#On the basis ofthe evolution of Chinese sci-tech association policy since the founding of P.R.C, this paper expands the classical punctuated-equilibrium model, and draws the following conclusions. First of all, the evolution of the relationship between the Chinese government and sci-tech association is in a key and dominant position in the process of policy changes of sci-tech association. Secondly, the change of the policy field is the premise for the adjustment of the relationship between the Chinese government and the sci-tech association. Finally, the development and inclusiveness of the policy field is an important factor for the benign development of the relationship between the government and the sci-tech association. Although at present academic circles still hold a skeptical and cautious attitude towards the judgment that there would be co-governance between the government and sci-tech association, it is certain that the relationship between the government and the sci-tech association in China will continue to move forward with the efforts in exploring and improving balance, and the role of science and technology association in innovative national construction and jointly building a social governance pattern ofco-governance and sharing will be further improved.#br#
|
|
Received: 18 October 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 范雅娜.双向嵌入谱系：政府购买社会工作服务的一个分析框架[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2021,36(4):36-53.
[2] 康晓光,韩恒.分类控制:当前中国大陆国家与社会关系研究[J].社会学研究,2005，20(6):73-89，243-244.
[3] 刘鹏.从分类控制走向嵌入型监管:地方政府社会组织管理政策创新[J].中国人民大学学报,2011,25(5):91-99.
[4] 汪锦军.嵌入与自治:社会治理中的政社关系再平衡[J].中国行政管理,2016，32(2):70-76.
[5] 唐文玉.行政吸纳服务——中国大陆国家与社会关系的一种新诠释[J].公共管理学报,2010,7(1):13-19，123-124.
[6] 郁建兴,沈永东.调适性合作:十八大以来中国政府与社会组织关系的策略性变革[J].政治学研究,2017，33(3):34-41，126.
[7] 徐盈艳,黎熙元.浮动控制与分层嵌入——服务外包下的政社关系调整机制分析[J].社会学研究,2018,33(2):115-139，244-245.
[8] 赵红.我国科技社团的发展现状及建议[J].科协论坛,2016，31(4):26-35.
[9] 潘建红,张怀艺.基于结构—功能分析的科技社团推进国家治理[J].中国科技论坛,2018，34(12):9-18.
[10] 刘松年,李建忠,罗艳玲.科技社团在国家创新体系中的功能及其建设[J].科技管理研究,2008,28(12):42-52.
[11] 杨红梅.科技社团核心竞争力的认识模型及实现初探[J].科学学研究,2012,30(5):654-664.
[12] 鲁云鹏.科学社会学理论视角下科技社团治理有效性评价与检验[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(24):125-133.
[13] 潘建红,杨利利.科技成果转化中科技社团的功能定位与实践策略[J].科学管理研究,2019,37(3):42-45.
[14] 王敏珍.科技社团与政府关系研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2011.
[15] BAUMGARTNER F R, JONES B D. Agendas and instability in American politics [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
[16] 杨冠琼.公共政策学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2009:162-188.
[17] 李朔严,张克.中国计划生育政策变迁研究(1956—2015)——基于间断均衡模型的视角[J].公共管理与政策评论,2016,5(4):32-42.
[18] 高新宇,吴尔.间断—均衡理论与农村环境治理政策演进逻辑——基于政策文本的分析[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,19(3):75-84，112.
[19] 姚华平.国家与社会互动：我国社会组织建设与管理的路径选择[D].武汉：华中师范大学,2010.
[20] 中国科协发展研究中心.中国科协全国学会组织通则相关历史文件选编[Z].2015.
[21] 谢菊,马庆钰.中国社会组织发展历程回顾[J].云南行政学院学报,2015,17(1):35-39.
[22] 王郅强,张晓君.改革开放40年以来中国应急管理变迁:以“间断—均衡”理论为视角[J].华南理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,20(6):70-79.
|
|
|
|
