|
|
Research on The Effect and Transmission Mechanism of Energy-consuming Right Trading System on Green Technological Innovation |
Zhang Aili,Chen Qian |
(School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China) |
|
|
Abstract Green technology innovation has the dual characteristics of improving production efficiency, saving energy and reducing emissions. Besides this, it is the fundamental way for China to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutral goals. As China accelerates the high-quality development, it is beneficial to explore how to drive green technology innovation for the achievement of the "dual carbon goal" and promotion of sustainable economic development. In this context, as an environmental policy tool to reduce energy consumption through market mechanism, the energy-consuming right trading system is the core tool to induce green technology innovation. It is of great theoretical and practical value for China to identify and clarify the impact effect and internal mechanism of the energy-consuming right trading system on green technology innovation, so as to promote green development and reduce the pressure of energy saving, emission reduction and economic transformation.#br#To begin with, this study sorts out the policy background and related concept of energy-consuming right trading system, and clarifies the operation principle of energy-consuming right trading system. On this basis, this study puts forward the viewpoint that the energy-consuming right trading system has a positive impact on enterprise green technology innovation, and analyses the transmission mechanism of the energy-consuming right trading system affecting green technology innovation from two aspects: R&D investment and government support.#br#Then according to the policy characteristics of the energy-consuming right trading system, this paper regards it as a quasi-natural experiment, and then it uses the data of China's A-share industrial enterprises from 2014 to 2019 to explore the impact of the energy-consuming right trading system on the green technology innovation of Chinese industrial enterprises and its action path. The results show that the energy-consuming right trading system significantly promotes the green technology innovation of Chinese industrial enterprises, and it is still established after a series of robustness tests. In addition, the effect of the energy-consuming right trading system on the green technology innovation of enterprises is heterogeneous according to the industry and the nature of ownership. Compared with high energy consuming enterprises, the effect of energy-consuming right trading system on promoting green technology innovation of non-high energy consuming enterprises is more significant. Furthermore, the positive impact of energy-consuming right trading system on non-state-owned enterprises is more obvious than that of the state-owned enterprises. By examining its transmission path, the study confirms that the energy-consuming right trading system promotes green technology innovation mainly through influencing R&D funds, R&D personnel, tax incentives and government subsidies.#br#On the basis of the empirical results and the policy objectives of the energy-consuming right trading system, this paper finally puts forward relevant suggestions for China to comprehensively promote the construction of the energy-consuming right trading market and promote the green technology innovation of enterprises from three aspects. Foremost it is important to keep improving the design of the energy-consuming right trading mechanism. On the premise of fully evaluating the existing industrial structure and regional energy consumption, it is necessary to explore the cross-regional paid transaction of total energy-consuming indicators so as to realize the flow and concentration of energy elements, and accelerate the construction of the national energy use trading market. Then it is crucial to make targeted system innovation according to the characteristics of energy consumption and thesituations of energy consumption transactions of different enterprises. The third is to establish a full-process supervision to ensure the standardized operation of the market. It is suggested to establish a legal framework at the national level and improve relevant rules and regulations at the local level so that there would be a legal basis for the transaction supervision and the control of potential credit risk and operational risk. Recommendations to stimulate future research about energy-consuming right trading system are offered, for instance the spatial spillover effect of energy-consuming right on green technology innovation of enterprises and the transmission effects of financial development in the process of enterprise technological innovation induced by the energy-consuming right trading system are worthy of further analysis.#br#
|
Received: 22 July 2021
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 王馨,王营.绿色信贷政策增进绿色创新研究[J].管理世界,2021,37(6):173-188. [2] 聂名华,齐昊.对外直接投资能否提升中国工业绿色创新效率:基于创新价值链与空间关联的视角[J].世界经济研究,2019,38(2):111-122,137. [3] 庞娟,靳书默,朱沛宇.外部网络关系对绿色技术创新的影响——促进抑或抑制[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(10):1-10. [4] 吴传清,申雨琦.中国装备制造业集聚对绿色创新效率的影响效应研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(5):54-63. [5] CLEFF T, RENNINGS K. Determinants of environmental product and process innovation[J]. European Environment,1999,9(5):191-201. [6] 杨明海,刘凯晴,谢送爽.教育人力资本、健康人力资本与绿色技术创新——环境规制的调节作用[J].经济与管理评论,2021,37(2):138-149. [7] KAMMERER D. The effects of customer benefit and regulation on environmental product innovation: empirical evidence from appliance manufacturers in Germany[J]. Ecological Economics,2009,68(8-9):2285-2295. [8] 熊广勤,石大千,李美娜.低碳城市试点对企业绿色技术创新的影响[J].科研管理,2020,41(12):93-102. [9] BORGHESI S, CAINELLI G, MAZZANTI M. Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry[J]. Research Policy,2015,44(3):669-683. [10] CALEL R, DECHEZLEPRTRE A. Environmental policy and directed technological change: evidence from the European carbon market[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,2016,98(1):173-191. [11] POPP D. Pollution control innovations and the clean air act of 1990[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,2003,22(4):641-660. [12] REQUATE T. Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments——a survey[J]. Ecological Economics,2005,54(2-3):175-195. [13] JOHNSTONE N, MANAGI S, RODRGUEZ M C, et al. Environmental policy design, innovation and efficiency gains in electricity generation[J]. Energy Economics,2017,63:106-115. [14] 彭星,李斌.不同类型环境规制下中国工业绿色转型问题研究[J].财经研究,2016,42(7):134-144. [15] 王娟茹,张渝.环境规制、绿色技术创新意愿与绿色技术创新行为[J].科学学研究,2018,36(2):352-360. [16] 李广培,李艳歌,全佳敏.环境规制、R&D投入与企业绿色技术创新能力[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(11):61-73. [17] 郭进.环境规制对绿色技术创新的影响——“波特效应”的中国证据[J].财贸经济,2019,40(3):147-160. [18] 刘海英,王钰.基于历史法和零和DEA方法的用能权与碳排放权初始分配研究[J].中国管理科学,2020,28(9):209-220. [19] 张宁,张维洁.中国用能权交易可以获得经济红利与节能减排的双赢吗[J].经济研究,2019,54(1):165-181. [20] 刘海英,王钰.用能权与碳排放权可交易政策组合下的经济红利效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(5):1-10. [21] 沈璐,陈素梅.用能权交易与企业绿色创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J].技术经济,2020,39(10):1-8,18. [22] 刘明明.论构建中国用能权交易体系的制度衔接之维[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(10):217-224. [23] LEE K H, MIN B. Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,108:534-542. [24] HUANG X X, HU Z P, LIU C S, et al. The relationships between regulatory and customer pressure, green organizational responses, and green innovation performance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,112:3423-3433. [25] 郭捷,杨立成.环境规制、政府研发资助对绿色技术创新的影响——基于中国内地省级层面数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(10):37-44. [26] HECKMAN J J, ICHIMURA H, TODD P E. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1997,64(4):605-654. [27] 黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016,51(4):60-73. [28] 蒋灵多,陆毅.最低工资标准能否抑制新僵尸企业的形成[J].中国工业经济,2017,34(11):118-136. [29] 潘彬,金雯雯.货币政策对民间借贷利率的作用机制与实施效果[J].经济研究,2017,52(8):78-93. [30] 温忠麟.张雷,侯杰泰,等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,69(5):614-620. [31] MACKINNON D P, LOCKWOOD C M, HOFFMAN J M, et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects[J]. Psychological Methods,2002,7(1):83-104.
|
|
|
|