|
|
|
| The Influence of the Military-civilian Deep Collaboration in Enterprises' Breakthrough of Key and Core Technologies |
| Sun Leihua,He Haiyan,Chang Xiaohan,Yuan Wei |
| (School of Management and Economics，Beijing Institute of Technology，Beijing 100081，China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Since the founding of new China, affected by the different focuses of economic and national defense construction in different historical periods, China has gradually formed a dual military-civilian structure in which economic construction and national defense construction are in separate operation. In order to solve this problem, marked by the issuance and implementation of the Opinions on the Integrated Development of Economic Construction and National Defense Construction (hereinafter referred to as the Opinions), China began to further integrate national defense and military construction into the economic and social development system, and keep improving the integrated development level of economic construction and national defense construction. China endeavors to promote the two-way flow, complementary and mutual use of military and local resources, gives full play to the national defense benefits of economic construction and the economic benefits of national defense construction, actively conducts joint research on key and core technologies especially in the field of science and technology, and promotes the synchronous improvement of military and civilian collaborative innovation capability. In the new era, it has become a major strategic choice for China to implement the overall national security concept and coordinate development and security by keeping promoting in-depth military-civilian collaboration. Hence there is important theoretical and practical significance for China's better overall development to systematically analyze and empirically study the influence mechanism of military civilian deep collaboration on enterprises' breakthrough in key and core technologies. However, from the existing research, there is no literature to systematically analyze and empirically study the impact of military civilian deep collaboration on enterprises' breakthrough of and core technologies and its internal mechanism. #br#This paper uses the implementation of the Opinions on the integrated development of economic construction and national defense construction as a quasi-natural experiment, and employs the difference-in-difference model to analyze the influence of military-civilian deep collaboration in enterprises to break through key and core technologies. The results show that the military-civilian deep colllaboration can help enterprises to break through key and core technologies. The above conclusion is still valid after parallel trend test, placebo test and other series of robustness tests. Moreover the deep military-civilian collaboration mainly breaks through the key and core technologies with the drives of technology, policy and market; the military-civilian deep collaboration can simultaneously promote the "military-into-civilian" and civilian-invested military enterprises, state-owned and private enterprises to break through the key and core technologies.#br#The possible contributions of this paper are as follows. (1) It builds an analytical framework for military civilian in-depth collaborative breakthrough in key and core technologies. on the basis of the theory of system science, this study analyzes how the in-depth military civilian cooperation systematically affects enterprises to break through key and core technologies. With the proposal of the "three wheel drive" mechanism containing technology market policy, it enriches the theoretical framework of this subdivided research field and deepens the understanding of how to give full play to the advantages of the new national system, integrate military and civilian forces to break through the "bottleneck" problems. (2) It tests the implementation effect of relevant strategic policies from the perspective of micro enterprises, and expands the research on the relationship between macro strategy and micro enterprise behavior. It not only enriches the research on the influencing factors of key and core technology breakthrough by investigating the breakthrough of key and core technologies from the perspective of military civilian deep collaboration, but also expands the research on the economic consequences of military civilian collaboration. (3) Through the empirical research, the study provides micro evidence that the strategy of military civilian deep coordination affects the breakthrough of key and core technologies, reveals the internal path of its impact and has important reference value for the follow-up deployment of military civilian synergy development strategy.#br#
|
|
Received: 26 May 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 徐辉，许嵩. 军民融合深度发展的科技协同创新体系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策，2015，32（18）：104-108.[2] 杜兰英，陈鑫. 发达国家军民融合的经验与启示[J]. 科技进步与对策，2011，28（23）：126-130.[3] 游光荣. 坚持军民一体化，建设和完善寓军于民的国防科技创新体系[J]. 中国软科学，2006，21（7）：68-79.[4] BRANDT L. Defense conversion and dual-use technology: the push toward civil-military integration[J]. Policy Studies Journal，1994，22（2）：359-370.[5] 黄朝峰，鞠晓生，纪建强，等. 军民融合何以能富国强军——军民融合、分工演进与报酬递增[J]. 经济研究，2017，52（8）：187-201.[6] 李宏宽，何海燕，蔡静静，等. 考虑评估指标关联性的我国军民融合发展水平评估研究——基于DEMATEL-ANP模型与灰色关联分析法[J]. 科技进步与对策，2018，35（9）：113-122.[7] 王进富，杨青云，张颖颖. 基于PMC-AE指数模型的军民融合政策量化评价[J]. 情报杂志，2019，33（4）：66-73.[8] 李冰，张纪海. 军民科技创新合作网络结构与演化——基于专利合作与社会网络实证分析[J]. 科技进步与对策，2021，38（21）：142-151.[9] 曹霞，杨笑君，张路蓬. 技术融合壁垒视角下我国军民技术融合模式及演化分析[J]. 管理评论，2021，33（3）：96-106.[10] 周宾. 军民融合产业技术协同创新能力影响因素分析与提升对策[J]. 科技进步与对策，2015，32（11）：87-93.[11] 彭本红，王雪娇. 网络嵌入、架构创新与军民融合协同创新绩效[J].科研管理，2021，42（7）：116-125.[12] 何海燕，王馨格，李宏宽. 军民深度融合下高校国防科技人才培养影响因素研究——基于双层嵌入理论和需求拉动理论的新视角[J]. 宏观经济研究，2018，13（4）：163-175.[13] 何海燕，曹华伟. 我国高校军民融合科研创新影响因素研究——基于Ordered Logit模型的实证分析[J]. 科技进步与对策，2020，37（10）：146-151.[14] 蔡建峰，张芳. 参军民企技术转移影响因素及内部机理研究[J]. 科研管理，2021，42（2）：30-39.[15] 汤志伟，李昱璇，张龙鹏. 中美贸易摩擦背景下“卡脖子”技术识别方法与突破路径——以电子信息产业为例[J]. 科技进步与对策，2021，38（1）：1-9.[16] 陈劲，阳镇，朱子钦. “十四五”时期“卡脖子”技术的破解：识别框架、战略转向与突破路径[J]. 改革，2020，33（12）：5-15.[17] 闫佳祺，罗瑾琏，贾建锋，等. 军民融合企业突破性创新的实现路径：基于“上海天安”的案例研究[J]. 南开管理评论，2022，25（1）：1-18.[18] BRUCH M. Toward a theory of modern domination[J]. International Journal of Political Economy，1999，29(3)：33-52.[19] 曾力宁，黄朝峰. 融资成本、金融可得性与军民科技协同创新——基于中关村与湖南省实践分析[J].科技进步与对策，2022，39（7）：114-122.[20] 李从容，贾梦飞，韩青. 财政政策对军民融合企业创新绩效的影响——创新投入的中介效应分析[J].科技进步与对策，2021，38（6）：113-121.[21] CHAMINADE C，EDQUIST C. Rationales for public policy intervention from a systems of innovation approach: the case of VINNOVA[J]. Papers in Innovation Studies，2006，11（1）：108-132.[22] 杨洋，魏江，罗来军. 谁在利用政府补贴进行创新——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J]. 管理世界，2015，31（1）：75-86，98，188.[23] 戚刚，曾立，易凡. 军民融合协同创新平台构建研究[J].科技进步与对策，2017，34（20）：121-125.[24] 温忠麟，张雷，侯杰泰，等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报，2004，36（5）：614-620.[25] 杨大飞，杨武，田雪姣，等. 基于专利数据的核心技术识别模型构建及实证研究[J]. 情报杂志，2021，40（2）：47-54.[26] DIETMAR H，FRANCIS N，SCHERER F M，et al. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions[J]. Review of Economics & Statistics, 1999,81(3):511-515.[27] YONG G L. What affects a patent's value? an analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic and indirect economic value: an exploratory conceptual approach[J]. Scientometrics，2009，79（3）：623-633.[28] 郭彦彦，吴福象. 专利权行政保护、关键技术创新与企业全要素生产率增长[J].经济经纬，2021，38（5）：101-110.[29] DAVID P，MICHAEL A H，JAVIER G. The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D[J]. The Academy of Management Journal，2001，44（1）：144-157.[30] RUMYANTSEV S，NETESSINE S. What can be learned from classical inventory models? a cross-industry exploratory investigation[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management，2007，9（4）：409-429.[31] 王桂军，卢潇潇. “一带一路”倡议与中国企业升级[J]. 中国工业经济，2019，36（3）：43-61.[32] 姜鲁鸣. 新时代中国军民融合发展战略论纲[J].改革，2018,31（3）：26-36. |
|
|
|
