|
|
|
| Could Relevant Policies Create Systematic Space for the Expansion of Civil-Military Resources?An Empirical Evaluation Based on Civil-military Resource Policy |
| Liu Jida1,2,Dong Changqi1,An Shi1,Wang Jian1,2 |
| (1.School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China; 2.Research Center for National Defense Development Strategy, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As the civil-military integration enters the stage of in-depth development, how to scientifically coordinate civil-military resources and speed up the effective transformation of civil-military elements has become an important research topic in the need of further analysis. The full expansion and smooth interactions of the national defense function of social resources and the civil function of national defense resources are both the key signs that the civil-military integration has entered a deep pattern and the necessary conditions for the maximum benefits of civil-military integration. The resource expansion is the development and extension of reasonable allocation of civil-military resources. Improving the expansion of civil-military resources is an important strategic measure to push through the resource limitation, optimize the resource structure and break through the bottleneck of economic and social development. Therefore the Chinese government has issued supporting policies of civil-military resources in the fields of economy, science and technology, environment, transportation and so on. As the direct or indirect tools to promote the integration of civil-military resources, the series of policies have certain architectural characteristics. This paper will map the expansion space of civil-military resources by evaluating and discussing the architecture of civil-military resource policy.#br#Firstly, this study designs the evaluation mechanism of resource expansion space created by civil-military resource policy. The basic contents of 79 civil-military resource policies from December 1978 to June 2021 are preliminarily identified by policy quantitative analysis. Secondly, based on the policy modeling consistency (PMC) index model, the evaluation index system of civil-military resource policy is designed according to the statistical results and characteristics of civil-military resource policies. The evaluation index system includes 16 first-level evaluation index variables and 55 second-level evaluation index variables from four dimensions of policy attribute, policy concept, policy content and policy implementation.Furthermore, the calculation method and grade classification standard of the PMC index scores of civil-military resource policy are introduced respectively. Thirdly, in order to explore the spatial effect of policies on the expansion of civil-military resources from the perspective of policy-making, 10 representative policies issued by the central government were selected from 79 typical civil-military resource policies to carry out an empirical study on civil-military resource policies. According to the scores of the first-level evaluation index variables of the civil-military resource policy, the study drew four grade PMC index radar charts of A (P4, P6, P7), B (P1, P2, P5, P8), C (P9, P10) and D (P3) respectively. It could be concluded that the research discriminates the characteristics of representative civil-military resource policies and their supporting effects on civil-military resource expansion on the whole. Further, in order to put forward the evaluation paradigm and improvement suggestions of different levels of civil-military resource policies, the study selected one typical civil-military resource policy from above four levels respectively for description. Then, the P7 (level A), P5 (level B), P9 (level C) and P3 (level D) are interpreted in detail in combination with PMC surface diagram and contour diagram.#br#The results of the research are as follows. (1) Although there are certain differences and hierarchical characteristics in the PMC index scores of various civil-military resource policies, the policies with different ratings have implemented the guiding ideology of civil-military integration, which provide institutional support and practical basis for civil-military resource expansion. Meanwhile, the expansion direction of civil-military resources is different in each period. The "two-way" integration and expansion of civil-military resources has become an important issue of the policies at the present stage. (2) The civil-military resource policies with high PMC index scores generally have the characteristics of extensive use, comprehensive resources and rich elements. This kind of policies have broad policy space and prominent systematic comprehensive characteristics, which can provide space for expanding civil-military resources in more scenarios. (3) The civil-military resource policies with low PMC index scores are mostly supporting policies for the weak links of the policy system and action guidelines for specific fields with the overall plan of top-level design. Although such policies have certain limitations in the scope of application and coverage due to limited types of resources, they can better use and release the limited governance resources. At the same time, the policies can also give full play to the focus and comparative advantages of special policies to further deepen the expansion level of civil-military resources. #br#By taking the expansion of civil-military resources as the policy implementation target, the study puts forward policy suggestions from four dimensions of policy attribute, policy concept, policy content and policy implementation .#br#
|
|
Received: 25 October 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 习近平关于军民融合发展论述摘编[J].人民论坛,2017(18):13.[2] 崔向华. 国防资源亟待科学统筹[N]. 光明日报,2016-01-13(011).[3] 游光荣,闫宏,赵旭.军民融合发展政策制度体系建设:现状、问题及对策[J].中国科技论坛,2017，33(1):150-156.[4] 常朝稳.军民融合核心是资源、技术和人才[J].人民论坛,2017，26(18):39.[5] 欧阳国华. 军民高效融合的三个规律[N]. 解放军报,2013-11-19(006).[6] 唐兴霖,王双喜.军民融合政策工具应用分析[J].经济社会体制比较,2018，34(3):166-172.[7] 王进富,杨青云,张颖颖.基于PMC-AE指数模型的军民融合政策量化评价[J].情报杂志,2019,38(4):66-73.[8] 杜人淮.国防工业全要素军民融合深度发展及其实现机制[J].南京政治学院学报,2015,31(4):57-63.[9] 张胜,黄欢,郭英远,等.陕西省军民科技资源开放共享的实现路径研究[J].情报杂志,2017,36(9):171-177，118.[10] 刘纪达,安实,王健.高校国防科技智库的建设现状与路径选择[J].中国高校科技,2020，34(10):33-37.[11] 陈建. 如何加强军民科技资源集成融合[N]. 学习时报,2012-08-27(007).[12] 王进富,潘毅,黄鹏飞.外部环境、资源拼凑与“军技民用”新产品开发关系研究——一个单案例探索[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(19):26-32.[13] 方正起,黄达.基于资源调控理论的军民科技协同创新平台建设研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(10):124-129.[14] 冯媛,郭永辉,夏冬秋.军民科技资源共享博弈与治理研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(15):42-48.[15] 杨渝南,张勇.军民融合产业资源优化配置研究综述[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(15):157-160.[16] 黄萃. 政策文献量化研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.[17] 朱亚鹏. 公共政策过程研究：理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2013.[18] 范柏乃,张茜蓉.公共政策质量的概念构思、测量指标与实际测量[J].北京行政学院学报,2014,16(6):1-7.[19] 杨雅南,钟书华.政策评价逻辑模型范式变迁[J].科学学研究,2013,31(5):657-665.[20] 杨大楷,刘曦腾.政策过程概念框架重构下的政策评价维度识别与应用[J].理论学刊,2015,32(10):90-97.[21] 傅雨飞.公共政策量化分析:研究范式转换的动因和价值[J].中国行政管理,2015,31(8):116-120.[22] 余冬平,毛晨.中国军民融合深度发展政策文本量化研究[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2021,34(3):96-104.[23] 陈华雄,黄灿宏,赵理,等.科技军民融合政策制度[J].国防科技,2018,39(5):62-69.[24] 阎波,张炜.科技军民融合政策:实施逻辑与路径选择[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,26(6):73-80.[25] 李娜,陈波.财税政策对军民协同创新的影响——基于DEA-Tobit模型[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(11):97-105.[26] ESTRADA M A R. Policy modeling:definition, classification and evaluation[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2011, 33(4):523-536.[27] 刘纪达,王健.变迁与演化：中国退役军人安置保障政策主题和机构关系网络研究[J].公共管理学报,2019,16(4):142-155，175.[28] 王云,刘敏.军民融合创新发展指标体系的维度与变量[J].情报杂志,2019,38(10):146-152.[29] 张永安,郄海拓.国务院创新政策量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(17):127-136.[30] 张永安,郄海拓.金融政策组合对企业技术创新影响的量化评价——基于PMC指数模型[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(2):113-121. |
|
|
|
