|
|
|
| Analysis of Regional Key&Core technology Innovation Groupings from a Resilience Perspective |
| Tian Xiaoli,Liu Yujing |
| (Faculty of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming 650093,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract China is currently at the forefront of a new round of scientific and technological revolution. Information technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data are accelerating the integration of traditional industries, with disruptive, creative key&core technologies creating new industrial forms. At present, although some areas have achieved outstanding science and technology achievements , the overall scientific and technological development has not met the requirements of innovation-driven development, and the transformation rate of scientific and technological achievements is far lower than that of developed countries. In the increasingly competitive international scientific and technological innovation environment, a large number of scientific and technological achievements have not yet been transformed into productive forces, posing a great challenge to China'skey&core technology innovation capability.#br#In the face of the current external situation of white-hot competition in science and technology and its impact on the development of science and technology innovation in China, it is urgent to think about how to develop key&core technology innovation from the perspective of resilience to provide strong support for scientific and technological progress and economic and social development.Based on a resilience perspective, this paper selects the top 34 domestic cities in terms of GDP and four major provincial capitals in addition to them as research samples, and uses qualitative comparative analysis to explore the multiple influencing factors and driving paths of coastal and inland cities in China to enhance key&core technology innovation by selecting eight conditional variables from four dimensions: diversity, evolution, mobility and buffer.#br#It is found that neither diversity, evolutionary, mobility nor buffering conditions alone can constitute the necessary conditions for enhancing key&core technology innovation, but require a combination of the condition variables to work synergistically with each other. At the same time, there are differences in the grouping paths driving key&core technology innovation between coastal and inland regions, and the importance of condition variables driving key&core technology innovation varies according to their own development characteristics, and there are potential substitution relationships between condition variables among grouping paths within each region.#br#Exploring the condition variables affecting the development of key&core technology innovation from the perspective of resilience is more relevant to the development pain points of insufficient intrinsic power and fierce external competition in the development of key&core technology innovation in China,and it can help optimize the process of key&core technology development and provide guidance suggestions for realizing key&core technology innovation. In addition, as a key technology that leads the new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial change, and has a significant supporting role for economic transformation and upgrading and social development, the development of key&core technology has important strategic significance for pulling the domestic market, realizing independent innovation and enhancing comprehensive scientific and technological strength. At present, there are few studies related to key&core technology innovation, and it will become an important topic of common concern for multidisciplinary fields in the future. It is of great practical significance and research value to conduct research on this emerging field of key&core technology innovation.#br#The value of this thesis is that it constructs an integrated analytical framework that drives key&core technology innovation in coastal and inland cities in China, and reveals the mechanism of the role of each region in enhancing key&core technology innovation. By exploring the combination of condition variables and driving paths that affect key&core technology innovation in each region, it helps each government to formulate policies according to local conditions, promote the overall improvement of key&core technology level, and create core technological advantages.#br#
|
|
Received: 03 September 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 杨斌,肖尤丹.国家科研机构硬科技成果转化模式研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(12):2149-2156.[2] 吕政.创新驱动必须以硬科技创新为本[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,38(2):1-11.[3] 吴玉伟,施永川.科技型小微企业“硬”科技创业动力要素与孵化模式研究[J].科学管理研究,2019,37(1):70-73.[4] 周灵灵,孙长青.构建硬科技企业自主创新税收激励政策体系研究[J].学习论坛,2020，35(3):29-35.[5] 徐文舸.2019年创业投资市场的机遇与挑战[J].宏观经济管理,2019，32(4):25-29，41.[6] WALKER B, HOLLIN C S, CARPENTER S R, et al. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology&Society,2004, 9(2):5. [7] MEEROW S,NEWELL J P,STULTS M. Defining urban resilience:a review[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 147:38-49.[8] WILDAVSKY A B. Searching for safety (Vol.10)[M].Piscataway:Transaction Publishers，1988.[9] 梁林,赵玉帛,刘兵.国家级新区创新生态系统韧性监测与预警研究[J].中国软科学,2020，35(7):92-111.[10] MERA A P,BALIJEPALLI C. Towards improving resilience of cities: an optimisation approach to minimising vulnerability to disruption due to natural disasters under budgetary constraints[J]. Transportation, 2020,47(4):1809-1842.[11] CAPOZZO M,RIZZI A,CIMELLARO G P,et al.Multi-hazard resilience assessment of a coastal community due to offshore earthquakes[J]. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 2019,13(2):1950008-1950027.[12] 孙久文,孙翔宇.区域经济韧性研究进展和在中国应用的探索[J].经济地理,2017,37(10):1-9.[13] 李连刚,张平宇,谭俊涛，等.韧性概念演变与区域经济韧性研究进展[J].人文地理,2019,34(2):1-7，151.[14] RAMEZANI J,CAMARINHA MATOS L.Approaches for resilience and antifragility in collaborative business ecosystems[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 151:119846-119872.[15] MARTIN R, SUNLEY P,GARDINER B, et al. How regions react to recessions: resilience and the role of economic structure[J]. Regional Studies, 2016, 50(4):561-585.[16] 李晓娣,张小燕.区域创新生态系统对区域创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].预测,2018,37(5):22-28，55.[17] 倪鹏飞,白晶,杨旭.城市创新系统的关键因素及其影响机制——基于全球436个城市数据的结构化方程模型[J].中国工业经济,2011，28(2):16-25.[18] 2020中国硬科技创新白皮书[R].中科院、华为、亿欧和西安市硬科技产业发展服务中心，2020.[19] 宛群超,袁凌,谭志红.科技人才集聚、市场竞争及其交互作用对高技术产业创新绩效的影响[J/OL].软科学:1-11[2021-08-23].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1268.g3.20210816.1709.031.html.[20] 吴非,常曦,任晓怡.政府驱动型创新:财政科技支出与企业数字化转型[J].财政研究,2021，41(1):102-115.[21] HAYTON J C. Competing in the new economy: the effect of intellectual capital on corporate entrepreneurship in high-technology new ventures[J]. R&D Management, 2005, 35(2):137-155.[22] 林原,马荣康,刘凤朝.技术流动对区域技术专业化的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(7):13-23.[23] 王雪,周金链.政府认定对高新技术企业研发支出的影响——兆驰股份案例分析[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(15):96-104.[24] 杨扬,谢佳松,林建浩，等.信任网络、资金流动与区域发展差距[J].系统工程理论与实践,2020,40(9):2222-2235.[25] ZAHRASA,GEORGEG. Absorptive capacity: a review,reconceptualization,and extension［J］. Academy of Management Review，2002，27(2):185-203.[26] 谭海波，范梓腾，杜运周.技术管理能力、注意力分配与地方政府网站建设——一项基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]．管理世界，2019，35(9)：81-94.[27] MEYER A D,TSUI A S,HININGS C R. Configurational approaches to organizational analysis[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(6):1175-1195.[28] 侯鹏,王琪延.中国内陆与沿海地区创新能力差距成因探析——基于随机前沿模型的实证研究[J].现代管理科学,2015，34(10):64-66.[29] 王进富,李嘉辉,张颖颖，等.政府资助波动、技术市场发展程度与国有企业R&D投入[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(10):28-35.[30] 庄子银,段思淼.区域技术市场发展对创新的驱动作用——来自2002-2015年省级面板数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(15):29-38.[31] RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008, 20-30. |
|
|
|
