|
|
|
| Quantitative Simulation and Verification of Wave Convergence Law of Science and Technology Vulnerability of Urban Agglomerations in China |
| Zeng Peng1,ChengYin2,Wei Xu1 |
| （1.School of Ethnology and Sociology, Guangxi University for Nationalities, Nanning 530006，China;2.School of Economics, Guangxi University for Nationalities, Nanning 530006，China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a collection of multiple cities radiating from the core city to the surrounding area, an urban agglomeration is used to be a new power source leading the development of science and technology in China. However, there are some problems mainly caused by the policy support, urban resources and positioning, such as the difficulty in effective utilization of scientific and technological resources and the unequal distribution of scientific and technological resources. Therefore, it is significant to study on the overall vulnerability of science and technology in urban agglomerations to accurately grasp the sensitivity of urban agglomerations to the science and technology system, and promote the stable and sustainable development of urban science and technology innovation ability in China.#br# The fluctuation mechanism of the vulnerability of science and technology in urban agglomerations is a nonlinear composite fluctuation curve formed with the time lapse and the increase of numbers of allied cities. In this paper, the changing law of wave convergence curve of science and technology vulnerability in urban agglomerations is analyzed in detail through geometric derivation. Then, the evaluation index system of science and technology vulnerability is constructed, and the evaluation score of science and technology vulnerability of all cities in Chinese urban agglomerations and urban agglomerations as a whole is calculated by the VHSD-EM method. In addition, ArcGIS10.2 is used to analyze the spatial trend surface of science and technology vulnerability of different urban agglomerations and cities within urban agglomerations, as well as the spatial pattern and spatio-temporal evolution after classification. The intensity model of joint prevention and control of scientific and technological risks in urban agglomeration and the calculation method of threshold value of science and technology system joint prevention and control are established. Finally, several wave convergence curves are fitted by using Matlab software based on the scientific and technological vulnerability values from 2009 to 2019.#br#The results show that (1) the change of science and technology vulnerability in Chinese urban agglomerations follows the law of wave convergence; (2) the change of science and technology vulnerability in Chinese urban agglomerations presents a wave convergence pattern, and the overall science and technology vulnerability gradually decreases and tends to an optimal stable value; (3) the intensity of joint prevention and control of science and technology risks generally tends to be in wave convergence, and there is a limit of joint prevention and control threshold, and at present, many cities in national urban agglomerations have combined with other cities for risk prevention and control, while few cities at regional and regional levels; (4) the convergence curve of science and technology vulnerability wave in China's urban agglomerations has been verified by practice, which shows that the convergence curves of science and technology vulnerability wave in different urban agglomerations are relatively similar, and the simulation effect of science and technology vulnerability function curve in urban agglomerations is good.#br#Through the overall vulnerability analysis of science and technology in urban agglomerations in China, this paper provides the following important theoretical and empirical reference for the operation of science and technology system in urban agglomerations in China. First, a scientific and technological innovation-driven strategy is suggested. Governments at all levels in urban agglomerations should thoroughly implement the strategy of innovation-driven development and promote scientific and technological innovation and high-tech development to a new level. Second, it is important to explore plans for integrated scientific and technological innovation. Governments at all levels within urban agglomerations should integrate the resources of the government, enterprises, academia and industry organizations to solve the difficulties in industry-university-research cooperation and commit themselves to the R&D and commercialization of revolutionary and cutting-edge manufacturing technologies. Third, systematic governance of scientific and technological innovation should be stressed. Governments at all levels within urban agglomerations should first strengthen the construction of scientific and technological data infrastructure, and promote the application of big data, cloud computing, Internet of Things, and artificial intelligence in scientific research and innovation activities. The last is to advise the governments at all levels in urban agglomerations to build a systematic and open science and technology innovation ecosystem.#br#
|
|
Received: 09 August 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 侯祥鹏.中国城市群高质量发展测度与比较[J].现代经济探讨,2021，40(2):9-18.[2] 胡翠萍.基于AHP-变异系数法的我国副省级城市科技竞争力评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(20):77-80.[3] 陈诗波,王书华,冶小梅,等.京津冀城市群科技协同创新研究[J].中国科技论坛,2015，31(7):63-68.[4] 朱鹏颐,刘东华,黄新焕.动态视角下城市科技创新效率评价研究——以福建九地级市为例[J].科研管理,2017,38(6):43-50.[5] 李光龙,范贤贤.财政支出、科技创新与经济高质量发展——基于长江经济带108个城市的实证检验[J].上海经济研究,2019，36(10):46-60.[6] 刘凯,任建兰,张宝雷.黄河三角洲人地系统脆弱性演化特征及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2019,39(6):198-204.[7] 朱金鹤,孙红雪.中国三大城市群城市韧性时空演进与影响因素研究[J].软科学,2020,34(2):72-79.[8] MELO PATRICIA C, GRAHAM DANIEL J, NOLAND ROBERT B. A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2008,39(3):332-342.[9] 陆大道,王铮,封志明,等.关于“胡焕庸线能否突破”的学术争鸣[J].地理研究,2016,35(5):805-824.[10] 方创琳.中国城市群研究取得的重要进展与未来发展方向[J].地理学报,2014,69(8):1130-1144.[11] 徐丹,于渤.长三角城市群高技术产业集聚空间溢出效应研究[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(6):29-37.[12] 盛朝迅,黄汉权.构建支撑供给侧结构性改革的创新体系研究[J].中国软科学,2017(5):20-29.[13] 胡兆廉,石大千,马静.“近水楼台”抑或“点石成金”——创新型城市的空间溢出效应研究[J].经济与管理研究,2021,42(1):66-87.[14] 李万,周小玲,胡曙虹,等.世界级科技创新城市群:长三角一体化与上海科创中心的共同抉择[J].智库理论与实践,2018,3(4):94-100.[15] 上海市人民政府发展研究中心课题组,肖林,周国平,严军.上海建设具有全球影响力科技创新中心战略研究[J].科学发展,2015，8(4):63-81.[16] 滕吉文,刘有山,皮娇龙.科学与技术的发展与大数据的时代反响——地球科学新信息的获取与创新再造[J].地球物理学进展,2016,31(1):1-22. |
|
|
|
