|
|
|
| Deconstruction of Technological Asymmetric Catch-up Strategy in the New Development Stage：from the Perspective of Science and Technology Leapfrogging Theory |
| Liu Qingling1,Zeng Li2 |
| (1. Institute of Frontier Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology;2. College of Arts and Sciences, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410005, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Under the guidance of the innovation-driven development strategy, China has made breakthroughs in scientific and technological innovation, and some fields have reached world-leading levels. However, opportunities and challenges coexist. China is still striving for clearing core technology bottlenecks, and what synchronously appears with the large scale of scientific and technological investment is the limited innovation capacity. Therefore it is urgent to reverse this situation by asymmetric catch-up and overtake of science and technology. As China is fast catching up with the developed world and it has emerged as a science and technology powerhouse, new situations, challenges and missions appear accordingly. At the same time, the new round of worldwide scientific and technological revolution is emerging, which requires continuously consolidating asymmetric advantages and forging more "killer" technologies to ensure that China's key core technologies are independent and controllable, as well as realize the scientific and technological self-reliance and self-improvement on time.#br# Based on the theory of technological leapfrogging, the connotation, the new logic and mechanism of technological asymmetric catch-up are respectively explained and demonstrated. As an important component of Xi Jinping Scientific and Technological Innovation Thought, technological asymmetric catching-uphas strategic significance for building a technologically powerful country. In the new stage of development, China's scientific and technological development presents the new situation of "following, concatenation and leading combined", which putting forward new requirements for technology asymmetric catch-up. The theoretical connotation of technological asymmetric catch-up includes the new logic in the new development stage and new mechanism with the theory of technological leapfrog. With the middle-bridge function of basic researches and core technology researches, the "following, concatenation and leading-combined" experience of asymmetrical catch-up in the new development stage corresponds to the three stages of "pursue-catch up-surpass" in technological leapfrogging, and in this way, new development model, realization conditions and characteristics are conformed in the process of fierce international competition.#br#The research finds that thetechnological asymmetric catch-up is the product of the combination of theory and practice which both have profound theoretical foundation and rich historical process. Although China needs to insist on independent innovation since entering a new stage of development, it should still participate in international exchanges and cooperation with inclusive attitudes, as well as learn from other countries. In general, the United Kingdom mainly has asymmetric advantages in refining the categories of modern natural disciplines, and has achieved technological catch-up in promoting basic research and industrial revolution. Correspondingly, the United States emphasizes the establishment of an innovation system for industry-university-research-government cooperation, which fully unleashes the enthusiasm of all parties and achieves asymmetrical catch-up in science and technology with strong sustainability. The Soviet Union's asymmetric catch-up and overtake in science and technology embodies the characteristics of planned economy dominance and national defense priority, which plays a strategic role in a specific historical period, and then Russia pays more attention to comprehensive improvement and overall innovation efficiency. Moreover, Japan and South Korea mainly rely on the government and chaebol organizations to obtain their asymmetric advantages, which in practice promotes the simultaneous development of the technology and the economy.#br#Based on the in-depth analysis of the technology catching up and surpassing experience of Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, Japan and South Korea, this paper comes to a conclusion that we should pay attention to the development of education, carry out basic research for a long time,keep focused on the forefront of scientific and technological development, and draw a conclusion in combination with the specific reality of our country. At the same time, this research also objectively indicates the profound drawbacks such as confusions of operating mechanism, failure of continuous advance, scarcity of comprehensive researches, etc. #br#China should rely on the new national system to effectively gather the advantageous resources of all parties, so as to promote the implementation of major national science and technology projects, andcontinue to make core technology's breakthroughs from strategic planning. It is important to advance practical measures by fully grasping strategic opportunities, optimizing the ecology of talent cultivation and accumulating advantages. Meanwhile it is not the blind pursuit of high efficiency by promoting technological leapfrog and catch-up on the basis of accumulating asymmetric advantages because of the equal importance of quality and quantity.#br#
|
|
Received: 19 July 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 刘立，刘磊. 实施非对称赶超战略突破“卡脖子”技术[J]. 国家治理,2020，7(45):3-8. [2] KO HYESOO, CHUNG YANGHON,WOO CHUNGWON. Choice of R&D strategy and asymmetric cost behaviour[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2021, 33(9) : 1022-1035. [3] PARDESI M S. India’s China strategy under Modi continuity in the management of an asymmetric rivalry[J]. International Politics, 2022, 59(1): 44-66. [4] APADIMOS T J, STAWICKI S P. Hannah Arendt's prognostication of political animus in America: social platforms, asymmetric conflict, and an offset strategy[J]. Open Journal of Philosophy, 2021, 11(1) : 85-103. [5] LIN WOON LEONG, LEE CHIN, LAW SIONG HOOK. Asymmetric effects of corporate sustainability strategy on value creation among global automotive firms: a dynamic panel quantile regression approach[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2021, 30(2) : 931-954. [6] CHEN KEGUI. Monitoring strategies of enterprise's emission reduction with asymmetric information[J]. RAIRO - Operations Research, 2021, 55(9)：2455-2470. [7] 胡耀辉. 中国人工智能产业非对称赶超路径研究[J]. 改革与战略,2021,37(7):31-42. [8] 陈元志,华斌. 非对称创新战略的内涵实质与理论诠释——习近平新时代中国特色社会主义科技创新思想探析[J]. 海派经济学,2018,16(3):14-24. [9] 陈强强，吴琳. 习近平关于科技创新与赶超的“非对称战略”思想[J]. 科学管理研究,2018,36(1):5-8. [10] 孙世会,刘敬富. 非对称赶超战略:科技创新政策的取向、目标和工具[J]. 山东社会科学,2021,34(3):112-117. [11] 罗晖. 非对称超越:实现科技领跑的战略突破口[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿,2016,5(21):64-70. [12] 李万. 实施非对称赶超战略的思考[J]. 前线,2016,79(12):33-35. [13] 宋一夫,施德福. 论社会结构的对称与非对称[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,58(1):55-63. [14] 马雪松. 新发展阶段:重大战略判断的时代意义[J]. 人民论坛,2020,19(35):46-49. [15] 陈理. 深刻理解把握我国进入新发展阶段的重要依据[J]. 中共党史研究,2020,30(6):5-16. [16] 魏莉. 近十年我国跨越式发展理论研究综述[J]. 新疆大学学报(哲学·人文社会科学版),2012,40(2):41-45. [17] 李晓莉,于渤. 面向技术跨越的后发企业技术创新战略与技术创新能力动态演化仿真研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(11):83-100. [18] 张利华. 论我国科技跨越式发展战略[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2002,38(10):40-42,65. [19] 陈俐,冯楚健,陈荣,等. 英国促进科技成果转移转化的经验借鉴——以国家技术创新中心和高校产学研创新体系为例[J]. 科技进步与对策,2016,33(15):9-14. [20] 姜桂兴. 英国面向2030年的科技创新政策研究[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望,2018,33(1):1-6. [21] 王昌林,姜江,盛朝讯,等. 大国崛起与科技创新——英国、德国、美国和日本的经验与启示[J]. 全球化,2015，5(9):39-49，117，133. [22] 李瑞,梁正. 发展型网络国家何以跨越科技成果转化的“死亡之谷”——美国先进制造产业联盟解读[J]. 科技进步与对策,2021,38(23):1-9. [23] 汪江桦,冷伏海,王海燕. 美国科技规划管理特点及启示[J]. 科技进步与对策,2013,30(7):106-110. [24] 宋兆杰,张敏卿,严建新. 苏联科技创新体系成败的移植文化因素分析[J]. 科学学研究,2012,30(11):1621-1626,1683. [25] 鲍鸥. 历经百年沧桑 打造科技基础——俄罗斯(包括苏联)建设科技强国之路[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2018,33(5):527-538. [26] 蒋菁. 俄罗斯科技创新体系的构建与发展[J]. 俄罗斯东欧中亚研究,2021(5):76-96，156-157. [27] 郭林,丁建定. 俄罗斯科技人才培养与激励政策的改革与启示[J]. 科技进步与对策,2012,29(1):147-151. [28] 生延超. 日本、韩国的技术赶超及其对中国的启示[J]. 中国科技论坛,2009，25(6):136-140. [29] 张宇星,李贵才. 新时期日本工业科技战略体系述评[J]. 现代日本经济,2021，39(6):77-92. [30] 洪元杓. 韩国赶超战略回顾:经济增长与技术创新[J]. 经济论坛,2018，32(7):19-23. [31] 李林,王艺,黄冕,等. 政府介入与产学研协同创新运行机制选择关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020,37(10):11-20. [32] 李敏,郭群群,雷育胜. 科技人才集聚与战略性新兴产业集聚的空间交互效应研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(22):67-73. [33] 崔宏轶,潘梦启,张超. 基于主成分分析法的深圳科技创新人才发展环境评析[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020,37(7):35-42. [34] 肖仁桥,沈路,钱丽. 新时代科技创新对中国经济高质量发展的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020,37(4):1-10. |
|
|
|
