|
|
|
| An Empirical Study on the Level of Digitization Transformation of Equipment Manufacturing Enterprises：Based on the Survey Data of Shaanxi Province |
| Zhang Peng1,2,Zhou Enyi1,Liu Qilei3 |
| （1. School of Management, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology,Xi'an 710200,China;2.School of Economics and Management, Xi'an Aeronautical University，Xi'an 710077,China; 3.School of Economics and Management, Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications, Xi'an 710061,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a fusion agent of digital economy and real economy, digital technology, in the form of big data, artificial intelligence and industrial Internet, has pushed global development into a new era characterized by data-driven and intelligent development, and has inspired more and more equipment manufacturing enterprises to start digital transformation and upgrading. With the development of digital economy, many scholars have studied the relationship between digital technology and manufacturing enterprises, mainly including industrial digitalization and digital industrialization, digital technology promotion of the transformation and upgradation of manufacturing enterprises, and measurement of the integration level of digital technology and manufacturing enterprises.#br#Firstly, the digital transformation mechanism is analyzed from two aspects: the external environment and internal manifestation faced by equipment manufacturing enterprises. The external environment mainly includes government regulations, the increasingly fierce competition among enterprises, the increasing personalized needs of users and the rapid development of digital technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence, cloud computing and 5G technology. Internal factors mainly include four aspects: modernization of enterprise management mode, digitization of product life cycle process, enrichment of digital products and flattening of enterprise organization structure. There is a steady exchange of information between external environment and digital transformation of equipment manufacturing enterprises, thus forming a benign ecosystem. In this ecosystem, the interaction of internal and external factors constructs the digital transformation mechanism and promotes the digital transformation process of equipment manufacturing enterprises.#br#According to the internal mechanism of the digital transformation of equipment manufacturing enterprises and the measurement standard of the transformation level, this paper studied the digital transformation of equipment manufacturing enterprises from the four dimensions of management mode reform, organizational structure reorganization, intelligent production process and service mode innovation by the methods of literature review, brainstorming, in-depth investigation and interview, and put forward the 12 first-level indicators and 23 second-level indicators and constructed the evaluation index system of digital transformation of equipment manufacturing enterprises. In order to further optimize the index structure, with the evaluation index of digital transformation of equipment manufacturing enterprises, this paper uses Delphi method to solicit the opinions and suggestions of experts and scholars again, and finally 9 first-class indexes and 17 second-class indexes were optimized as the measurement index system of digital transformation of equipment manufacturing enterprises.#br#After the establishment of the evaluation index system, 28 equipment manufacturing enterprises above designated scale in Shaanxi Province were randomly selected for questionnaire investigation. A total of 560 questionnaires were distributed and 412 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 73.6%. The reliability and validity of the survey data was the data support of the research,and the TOPSIS evaluation method of entropy weight and factor analysis were used to measure and analyze the level of digital transformation.#br#The empirical results show that the overall level of digital transformation of equipment manufacturing enterprises in Shaanxi is not high, and the transformation speed is slow. According to the research results, the ways to speed up the digital transformation and upgrading of equipment manufacturing enterprises in Shaanxi are put forward from four aspects: increasing government policy guidance and capital investment, accelerating the infrastructure construction of digital transformation of enterprises, improving the introduction and training system of digital transformation talents and promoting the collaborative innovation and development of industrial chain.#br#
|
|
Received: 15 June 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 谷方杰,张文锋. 基于价值链视角下企业数字化转型策略探究:以西贝餐饮集团为例[J]. 中国软科学,2020，35(11):134-142.[2] 刘淑春,闫津臣,张思雪,等. 企业管理数字化变革能提升投入产出效率吗[J]. 管理世界,2021,37(5):170-190,13.[3] NAMBISAN S,LYYTINEN K,MAJCHRZAK A,et al. Digital innovation management:reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly,2017,41(1):223-238.[4] 贾晖,郭亚楠,初浩,等. 后疫情时代下数字经济带动经济发展的实证分析[J]. 工业技术经济,2020,39(11):138-144.[5] 安宇宏. 数字经济[J]. 宏观经济管理,2016,32(12):76-77.[6] 赵西三. 数字经济驱动中国制造转型升级研究[J]. 中州学刊,2017,39(12):36-41.[7] 刘昭洁. 数字经济背景下的产业融合研究 :基于制造业的视角[D]. 北京:对外经济贸易大学,2018.[8] GRAY J,RUMPE B. Models for the digital transformation[J]. Software & Systems Modeling,2017,16(2):307-308.[9] DIMITROV D V. Medical Internet of Things and big data in healthcare[J]. Healthcare Informatics Research,2016,22(3):156-163.[10] 祝合良,王春娟. “双循环”新发展格局战略背景下产业数字化转型:理论与对策[J]. 财贸经济,2021,42(3):14-27.[11] 池仁勇,郑瑞钰,阮鸿鹏. 企业制造过程与商业模式双重数字化转型研究[J]. 科学学研究,2021,39（4）:13-25.[12] 李辉,梁丹丹. 企业数字化转型的机制、路径与对策[J]. 贵州社会科学,2020，41(10):120-125.[13] AUGUSTSSON N P,NILSSON A,HOLMSTRM J,et al. Managing digital infrastructures:negotiating control and drift in service provisioning[J]. International Journal of Business Information Systems,2019,30(1):51-78.[14] 王核成,王思惟,刘人怀. 企业数字化成熟度模型研究[J]. 管理评论,2021, 33(1):39-48.[15] 万伦,王顺强,陈希,等. 制造业数字化转型评价指标体系构建与应用研究[J]. 科技管理研究,2020,40(13):142-148.[16] 王德辉,吴子昂. 数字经济促进我国制造业转型升级的机制与对策研究[J]. 长白学刊,2020,36(6):92-99.[17] 邬爱其,宋迪. 制造企业的数字化转型：应用场景与主要策略[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2020(11):28-36.[18] 高升,孙会荟,刘伟. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的海洋经济系统脆弱性评价与障碍度分析[J]. 生态经济,2021,37(10):77-83.[19] 俞立平. 基于神经网络的非线性学术评价指标模拟权重研究:以因子分析评价为例[J]. 现代情报,2021,41(4):133-145.[20] BALSMEIER B,WOERTER M. Is this time different? how digitalization influences job creation and destruction[J]. Research Policy,2019,48(8):103765.[21] 马文秀,高周川. 日本制造业数字化转型发展战略[J]. 现代日本经济,2021,40(1):27-42.[22] 曾德麟,蔡家玮,欧阳桃花. 数字化转型研究：整合框架与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2021,43(5):63-76.[23] 何文彬. 数字化转型与我国制造业全球价值链攀升效应研究[J]. 统计与决策,2021,37(10):97-101.[24] 刘涛,张夏恒. 我国中小企业数字化转型现状、问题及对策[J]. 贵州社会科学,2021,42(2):148-155. |
|
|
|
