|
|
|
| Research on the Influence of Upstream Monopoly of State-owned Enterprises on Regional Innovation Capability:A Test of Regulatory Effect Based on Business Environment |
| Wang Xing,Wei Jiayi |
| (Faculty of International Trade, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics，Taiyuan 030006，China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics has entered a new era with the basic feature of high-quality development driven by innovation. The Fifth Plenary Session of the 19th CPC Central Committee focused on the important role of innovation ability in economic and social development. In the background of complex international situation, the sustainable development of China's economy must rely on endogenous growth, and innovation is the key factor to promote the formation of the "dual circulation" development pattern. State-owned enterprises have high hopes in driving economic development. It shall have a vital impact whether they can break through the shackles of multiple systems and vigorously improve their innovation ability.#br#From the perspective of industrial chain, state-owned enterprises are more concentrated in upstream industries, such as natural gas and oil, and mostly in a monopoly pattern. The monopoly of state-owned enterprises in upstream industries is possible to damage the total social welfare, hinder fair market competition, reduce production efficiency, and may have a negative effect on the improvement of regional innovation ability. The monopoly of state-owned enterprises in upstream industries may also affect the innovation level and innovation intensity of downstream industries through the price and quality of raw materials and intermediate products, which is not conducive to the improvement of regional innovation ability. In addition, the state-owned enterprises with monopoly position in upstream industries is also easy to ignore the personalized characteristics of different demanders, so as to reduce the technological innovation on the supply side. Optimization of business environment is conducive to innovation, it can improve the market environment, the development level of non-state-owned economy and the factor market environment of a region. Therefore, it is of great significance to further comb and seriously analyse the conflict mechanism between the monopoly reality of state-owned enterprises in upstream industries and the improvement of regional innovation ability, and investigate the role mechanism of business environment, for it can not only enrich the existing research perspective and content, but also has important practical significance, and can provide effective suggestions for improving regional innovation ability.#br#This paper uses provincial panel data for empirical test. The time span is from 2008-2017. Due to the availability of data, the main analysis objects are the 26 provinces except Hainan, Jilin, Shanghai, Tibet and Yunnan. The data sources include China Statistical Yearbook, China Industrial Statistical Yearbook, China Science and Technology Statistical Yearbook and the Fourth National Economic Census and Wind Database. The explanatory variable of this paper is regional innovation ability, i.e. the upstream monopoly degree of regional state-owned enterprises, and the control variables include full-time equivalent of R&D personnel, economic development level, industrial structure, urbanization level and foreign investment level. In order to analyze the role of the business environment, Marketization Index of China′s Provinces are introduced to measure the regional business environment. This paper uses panel model for benchmark test with the aim of testing the impact of upstream monopoly degree of state-owned enterprises on regional innovation level, and a regulatory effect model is constructed to test the role of business environment.#br#The results show that the upstream monopoly of state-owned enterprises inhibit the regional innovation ability, that is, the higher the degree of upstream monopoly of state-owned enterprises, the weaker the regional innovation ability. The empirical test results based on the regulatory effect of business environment show that optimizing business environment can alleviate the inhibitory effect of upstream monopoly of state-owned enterprises on regional innovation ability. The improvement of marketization level in the business environment, the development of non-state-owned economy and the development of factor market are conducive to the improvement of regional innovation ability, and play a regulatory role in the impact of upstream monopoly of state-owned enterprises on regional innovation ability.#br#For deeper analysis, this paper examines the heterogeneity of innovation ability in areas affected by upstream monopoly of state-owned enterprises from three aspects: geographical characteristics, factor allocation and government role. The results show that for regions with different characteristics, the inhibitory effect of upstream monopoly of state-owned enterprises on regional innovation ability is heterogeneous. Through the above theoretical and empirical analysis, this paper has the following innovations.Firstly, from the perspective of meso level, this paper analyzes the impact of upstream monopoly of state-owned enterprises at the provincial level on regional innovation ability. Secondly, the business environment is included in the analysis of the innovation ability of the areas affected by the upstream monopoly of state-owned enterprises, and its mechanism is studied in detail. Thirdly, it analyses the heterogeneous impact of upstream monopoly of state-owned enterprises on regional innovation ability from the three levels of physical geography, market and government so that it enriches the existing research. We suggest to reduce the proportion of upstream monopoly of regional state-owned enterprises, encourage the development of non-state-owned economy and optimize the regional business environment so as to to promote the improvement of regional innovation ability and accelerate the formation of dual circulation pattern.#br#
|
|
Received: 06 May 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 刘瑞明，石磊. 上游垄断、非对称竞争与社会福利——兼论大中型国有企业利润的性质[J]. 经济研究，2011，46(12)：86-96.[2] 吴延兵. 国有企业双重效率损失研究[J]. 经济研究，2012，47(3)：15-27.[3] 钱学锋，张洁，毛海涛. 垂直结构、资源误置与产业政策[J]. 经济研究，2019，54(2)：54-67.[4] 郭树龙，葛健，刘玉斌. 上游垄断阻碍了下游企业创新吗[J]. 产经评论，2019，10(2)：38-53.[5] 何有良. 上游垄断是否阻碍了中国制造业企业创新[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报)，2017，37(10)：50-64.[6] KIRZNER I M. Competition and entrepreneurship[M]. University of Chicago Press Economics Books，1978.[7] 江轩宇. 政府放权与国有企业创新——基于地方国企金字塔结构视角的研究[J]. 管理世界，2016，32(9)：120-135.[8] 吴延兵. 不同所有制企业技术创新能力考察[J]. 产业经济研究，2014，13(2)：53-64.[9] 白积洋，刘成奎. 财税政策效应、政府效率与高新技术产业发展[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报，2020，22(5)：68-78.[10] 李增福，骆欣怡. 高管薪酬凭能力还是凭运气——基于高管薪酬业绩敏感性的研究[J]. 财贸研究，2018，29(7)：91-101.[11] 李政，陆寅宏. 国有企业真的缺乏创新能力吗——基于上市公司所有权性质与创新绩效的实证分析与比较[J]. 经济理论与经济管理，2014(2)：27-38.[12] 陈晨，张广胜. 国家创新型企业政策是否促进了企业创新[J]. 财经论丛，2020(10)：85-95.[13] 师博，张瀚禹. “营改增”的创新效应：基于模糊断点回归的经验证据[J]. 财经科学，2018，62(11)：51-60.[14] 姚博，孙永强. 外向FDI与企业产品创新——基于竞争决策的空间交互作用分析[J]. 当代经济科学，2020，42(4)：113-128.[15] 王永进，刘灿雷. 国有企业上游垄断阻碍了中国的经济增长——基于制造业数据的微观考察[J]. 管理世界，2016，32(6)：10-21，187.[16] 夏后学，谭清美，白俊红. 营商环境、企业寻租与市场创新——来自中国企业营商环境调查的经验证据[J]. 经济研究，2019，54(4)：84-98.[17] 常红，王军. 环境规制对经济增长的影响研究——基于技术创新门槛的经验分析[J]. 经济问题探索，2020，41(11)：41-51.[18] 管金平. 地方税收优惠政策治理的理念重塑与制度回应[J]. 财经问题研究，2020，42(10)：83-89.[19] 胡令，王靖宇. 产品市场竞争与企业创新效率——基于准自然实验的研究[J]. 现代经济探讨，2020，39(9)：98-106.[20] 康年，顾倩雯，宋波. 基于三阶段DEA模型的国家中心城市制造企业创新效率研究[J]. 科技管理研究，2019，39(8)：9-14.[21] 戴魁早，刘友金. 要素市场扭曲与创新效率——对中国高技术产业发展的经验分析[J]. 经济研究，2016，51(7)：72-86.[22] 张璇，刘贝贝，汪婷，等. 信贷寻租、融资约束与企业创新[J]. 经济研究，2017，52(5)：161-174.[23] 汪伟，潘孝挺. 金融要素扭曲与企业创新活动[J]. 统计研究，2015，32(5)：26-31.[24] 纪雯雯，赖德胜. 人力资本、配置效率及全要素生产率变化[J]. 经济与管理研究，2015，36(6)：45-55.[25] 葛晶，李勇. 行政垄断视角下人力资本错配的成因及其解释[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报，2019(5)：43-52，159.[26] 周越，徐隽翊. 中国经济中的垂直市场与企业动态——基于DSGE的模型研究[J]. 经济学报，2020，7(3)：20-52.[27] 钱水土，吴卫华. 信用环境、定向降准与小微企业信贷融资——基于合成控制法的经验研究[J]. 财贸经济，2020，41(2)：99-114.[28] 盛丹，刘灿雷. 外部监管能够改善国企经营绩效与改制成效吗[J]. 经济研究，2016，51(10)：97-111.[29] 徐浩，张美莎. 营商环境、关系型融资与技术创新[J]. 当代财经，2019(12)：73-83.[30] 何旭，马如飞. 高管学术背景、市场化进程与企业创新投入[J]. 云南财经大学学报，2020，36(10)：88-100.[31] 戴魁早，刘友金. 市场化进程对创新效率的影响及行业差异——基于中国高技术产业的实证检验[J]. 财经研究，2013，39(5)：4-16.[32] 陈博，尚晓贺，陶江. 制度环境、银行信贷与高技术产业发展——基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J]. 经济问题探索，2016，37(5)：1-8.[33] 刘万丽. 高管短期薪酬、风险承担与研发投资[J]. 中国软科学，2020，35(7)：178-186.[34] 复旦大学经济学院，第一财经研究院.中国城市和产业创新力报告[R].上海，2017.[35] 徐圆，邓胡艳. 多样化、创新能力与城市经济韧性[J]. 经济学动态，2020(8)：88-104.[36] HALL R E. The relation between price and marginal cost in US industry[J]. Journal of Political Economic， 1988，96(5)：921-947.[37] KLETTE T J，GRILICHES Z. The inconsistency of common scale estimators when output prices are unobserved and endogenous[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics，1996，11(4)：343-361.[38] KIETTE T J.Market power，scale economies and productivity：estimates from a panel of establishment data[J].Journal of Industrial Economics，1999，47(4)：451-476.[39] AGHION P BLOOM N，BLUNDELL R GRIFFITH R,HOWITT P. Competition and innovation： an inverted relationship[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2005，120(2)：701-728.[40] GRILICHES Z.Patent statistics as economic indicators：a survey[J].Journal od Economic Literature,1990，28(4)：1661-1707.[41] 毛其淋. 外资进入自由化如何影响了中国本土企业创新[J]. 金融研究，2019,62(1)：72-90.[42] ANTRàS P, CHOR D, FALLY T, et al. Measuring the upstreamness of production and trade flows[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(3): 412-416.[43] 单春霞，仲伟周，耿紫珍，等. 环境规制、行业异质性对工业行业技术创新的影响研究[J]. 经济问题，2019,41(12)：60-67.[44] 陈朝阳，刘效含，孟繁倩，等. FDI对城市创新能力的影响研究——基于分位数回归的实证分析[J]. 管理现代化，2020，40(4)：92-96.[45] 刘军，付建栋. 营商环境优化、双重关系与企业产能利用率[J]. 上海财经大学学报，2019，21(4)：70-89.[46] 温忠麟，侯杰泰，张雷. 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J]. 心理学报，2005,50(2)：268-274.[47] SONG Z，STORESLETTEN K ,ZILIBOTTI F. Growing like China[J]. American Economic Review,2011，101(1): 196-233.[48] 范瑞，王书华. 银行业市场结构对中国经济增长的影响研究：理论机制与经验证据[J]. 宏观经济研究，2020,66(7)：17-32，96.[49] 薛欣欣，辛立国. 国有部门员工被过高支付还是拥有特殊人力资本——来自有限混合模型的估计结果[J]. 南方经济，2015,33(10)：85-98.[50] 金友森，张琴韵，许和连. 银行发展对企业创新的影响——基于商业银行县域密度的证据[J]. 金融论坛，2020，25(2)：44-55.[51] 李雨浓，赵维，周茂，朱连明. 外资管制放松如何影响企业非产成品存货调整[J]. 中国工业经济，2020，37(9)：118-136.[52] 庄子银，李宏武. 贸易、知识产权与出口企业创新：基于美国337调查的实证分析[J]. 世界经济研究，2018,37(4)：75-87，136.[53] 张杰，周晓艳，李勇.要素市场扭曲抑制了中国企业R&D[J].经济研究，2011，46(8)：78-91.[54] 邱兆林，王业辉. 行政垄断约束下环境规制对工业生态效率的影响——基于动态空间杜宾模型与门槛效应的检验[J]. 产业经济研究，2018,17(5)：114-126.[55] 赵富森. 高技术产业出口技术复杂度与中国经济增长质量[J]. 统计与信息论坛，2020，35(9)：42-53.[56] 吴翌琳，于鸿君. 企业创新推动高质量发展的路径研究——基于中国制造业企业的微观实证[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)，2020，57(2)：105-118.[57] 柏培文. 中国劳动要素配置扭曲程度的测量[J]. 中国工业经济，2012，29(10)：19-31.[58] 陈汝影，余东华. 中间投入品资源错配与制造业全要素生产率[J]. 产业经济研究，2020,19(4)：115-128.[59] 邢炜，周孝. 国企改革与技术创新模式转变[J]. 产业经济研究，2016,15(6)：22-33，45. |
|
|
|
