|
|
|
| Influence of City Intellectual Management on Sustainable Development |
| Yu Dengke,Huang Xiaoyan |
| (School of Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the new era, China's urbanization process is accelerating. Urbanization has brought new logic, new opportunities and new drivers to China's economic development. However, urbanization has also brought some systemic problems. In order to deal with the problems and realize sustainable development, Chinese government proposes to modernize municipal social governance. Nevertheless, how to innovate municipal social governance lacks in-depth academic exploration at present.#br#The study proposes the idea of city intellectual management by introducing intellectual management theory in organizational field into city governance. For sustainable urban development, both knowledge and personality capital are indispensable, and they complement each other in structure and promote each other in function. Therefore, urban intellectual management is committed to promoting the coupling and coordination between knowledge management and character management in cities, which is specifically reflected in the co-direction, synchronization, association, collaboration and interaction mechanism between the two. Intellectual management enhances the growth of cities′ knowledge and personality capital and then promotes their sustainable developments.#br#The study focuses on answering the following research questions. First, can the knowledge capital and personality of a city form the main driving factors for its sustainable development? Second, how much impact does the coupling degree and coordination degree of urban knowledge capital and personality have on urban sustainable development? In order to answer the above questions, we follow the following three research steps. First, we evaluate the levels of urban knowledge capital, personality capital and sustainable development; second, we measure the degree of coupling coordination between knowledge and personality capital; and lastly we measure the effect of urban intellectual management on urban sustainable development.#br#We complete the evaluation process by develop a method through the combination of entropy weight and TOPSIS, and construct a coupling coordination degree model to measure the degree of coupling and coordination. Thirty provincial capital cities or municipalities are taken as samples to support the empirical analysis. Furthermore, we measure the impacts by using linear regression, ridge regression method and Sobel test procedure. #br#The study reveals the positive roles of knowledge capital, personality capital as well as their coupling coordination degree in the increasing of sustainable development capacity. It is found that the thirty provincial capitals or municipalities in mainland China still have great potential in the development of knowledge capital and personality, which needs further improvement of the level of urban sustainable development; there is a high correlation between urban knowledge capital, personality capital and sustainable development level, especially the consistency between personality capital and sustainable development level; the personality capital and its square term and the coupling coordination degree between personality and knowledge capital have been proved to be the main factors to promote the level of urban sustainable development; however, urban knowledge capital has no significant direct influence on sustainable development.#br#By introducing the intellectual management theory of enterprise organization into the modernization practice of municipal social governance, the intellectual management theory of municipal society can be developed. The core points of the theory include three aspects. The first is the combined application, cooperative governance of knowledge management and character management, which constitute the main content of municipal intellectual management. The next refers to two intangible resources, i.e. knowledge and personality capital, which constitute the core driving factors of urban sustainable development. The third is the coupling and coordination between knowledge capital and personality capital which generates the sustainable mechanism of urban development.#br#We therefore put forward the following three countermeasures for the promotion of city's sustainable development from the perspective of city intellectual management. First, cities can explore ways to promote and enhance the modernization of municipal social governance from the perspective of strengthening the coordination between knowledge management and character management. Second, cities should strive to build a coupling and coordinated development mechanism of knowledge capital and personality capital, so that they can balance, promote and transform each other to promote sustainable urban development. Finally, the conception of urban intellectual management remains theoretical, and it may have various structures and application patterns in practice. Different cities, especially cities in different regions, should formulate appropriate intellectual management strategies and programs according to their respective development situation and relative advantages and disadvantages.#br#The limitations of this study are mainly reflected in three aspects. First, the sample size of provincial capital cities or municipalities is small. Next in the construction of the index system, a compromise has been made on the science and feasibility, and a few indexes still need to be considered and optimized and; third, although time window is taken into account, this study is still a research result based on cross-section data in essence, and lacks causality analysis based on longitudinal data. Therefore, we will focus on the optimization and improvement of samples, indicators, data and other aspects in the future, so as to obtain more scientific and reliable research results for providing more abundant and universal evidence for the theory of municipal intellectual management.#br#
|
|
Received: 20 May 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 庞金友. “中国之治”的市域之维: 新时代市域治理现代化的逻辑与方略[J]. 人民论坛, 2020，29(35): 78-80.[2] 易中天. 城市性格[J]. 厦门航空, 2008，14(11): 116-118，120，122.[3] 中国城市活力研究组. 北京的性格[M]. 北京:中国经济出版社, 2005.[4] [美]阿历克斯·英格尔斯. 人的现代化——心理、思想、态度、作为[M]. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 1985.[5] 喻登科, 周荣, 涂国平. 论“知性管理”[J]. 情报杂志, 2015,34(6): 200-207.[6] 姜方炳. 推进市域社会治理现代化:历史源流与现实动因[J]. 中共杭州市委党校学报, 2021,22(1): 81-89.[7] 叶英波. 市域社会治理现代化的立法路径思考[J]. 人大研究, 2021，32(3): 33-36.[8] 郁建兴, 任杰. 市域社会治理现代化的科学内涵和前进方向[J]. 政策瞭望, 2021,19(1): 50-52.[9] 喻登科, 肖欢, 彭静, 等. 知识资本、组织性格与组织绩效的结构方程分析——基于中小板上市企业的经验数据[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017,34(23): 138-146.[10] LI J, YU D. The path to innovation: the antecedent perspective of intellectual capital and organizational character[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018,9:2445.[11] YU D, XIAO H, BO Q. The dimensions of organizational character and its impacts on organizational performance in Chinese context[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018, 9: 1049.[12] 喻登科, 严红玲. 核心竞争力与竞争优势的形成路径:基于知识资本与组织性格整合视角的解释[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019,36(1): 122-131.[13] XIAO H, YU D. Achieving sustainable competitive advantage through intellectual capital and corporate character: the mediating role of innovation[J]. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 2020,15(1): 33-45.[14] 曹清峰, 倪鹏飞, 马洪福. 科技创新对中国城市群协调发展的影响研究——基于城市可持续竞争力的分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020,20(2): 51-58，81.[15] 周长城, 徐鹏. “新绿色革命”与城市治理体系的创新——丹麦可持续发展经验对中国的启示[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2014，23(22): 74-83.[16] 陈乙华, 曹劲松. 文化赋能城市的内在机理与实践路径[J]. 南京社会科学, 2020，31(8): 129-137.[17] 厉无畏.“创意城市:创新、融合、可持续发展”专题[J]. 社会科学, 2010，32(11): 4.[18] 倪鹏飞, 徐海东, 刘笑男. 耦合协调度与城市可持续竞争力——基于亚洲564个城市的分析[J]. 社会科学战线, 2021，34(2): 70-77.[19] 岳良文, 李孟刚, 武春友. 城市化、信息化和绿色化互动评价模型:基于耦合理论的实证分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2017，38(6): 71-80.[20] 孙继琼. 黄河流域生态保护与高质量发展的耦合协调：评价与趋势[J]. 财经科学, 2021，65(3): 106-118.[21] YU D, ZHOU R. Intellectual management: an integrative theory[J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2017,8(3): 929-956.[22] 喻登科, 彭静, 肖欢, 等. 国家知识资本区域配置的水平、效率与均等化指数测量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017,34(11): 25-34.[23] SHAHRAM G, HOSEIN G, ZAHED B, et al. Dimensions of knowledge management on good urban governance (case study: Municipality of Rasht City, Iran)[J]. Journal of Management & Strategy, 2011, 2(3)：91-101.[24] JOHN O P, SRIVASTAVA S. The big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives[M]//PERVIN L A, JOHN O P.Handbook of personality:theory and research.New York: Guilford Press, 1999: 102-138.[25] 习近平. 深入理解新发展理念[J]. 社会主义论坛, 2019,34(6): 4-8.[26] 何得桂, 梁佳玉. 市域社会治理现代化研究热点评析与趋势展望[J]. 领导科学论坛, 2021,34(3): 49-56.[27] 喻登科, 陈华, 郎益夫. 基尼系数和熵在公平指数测量中的比较[J]. 统计与决策, 2012,28(3): 95-96.[28] 刘希宋, 王毅, 喻登科. 2001-2006年我国知识竞争力的战略评价[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2009, 26(19): 128-133.[29] 喻登科, 陈淑婷, 朱钊颍. 管理创新有效性验证及实现路径研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020,37(8): 1-9.[30] 王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 等. 国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 793-810.[31] 陈钰芬. 区域智力资本测度指标体系的构建[J]. 统计研究, 2006,22(2): 24-29.[32] 金水英. 基于知识资本的城市核心竞争力评价体系研究[J]. 中国集体经济, 2012,28(25): 78-79.[33] 张漾. 试论知识资本理论:城市竞争力研究的新视角[J]. 市场周刊(理论研究), 2016,39(2): 14-16.[34] 詹新宇, 崔培培. 中国省际经济增长质量的测度与评价——基于“五大发展理念”的实证分析[J]. 财政研究, 2016,37(8): 40-53，39.[35] 杜洪策, 路鑫, 邱昭睿. 滨海新区五大发展理念统计评价指标体系研究[J]. 天津经济, 2017,23(3): 8-15.[36] 杨新洪. “五大发展理念”统计评价指标体系构建——以深圳市为例[J]. 调研世界, 2017,30(7): 3-7.[37] 张永恒. 五大发展理念视角下的河南省高质量发展评价研究——基于熵权TOPSISI分析法[J]. 河南科学, 2019, 37(7): 1187-1195.[38] 李婧瑗. 以创新驱动制造业高质量发展路径[J]. 创新科技, 2019, 19(8): 32-37.[39] 丘艳娟. 新时代高质量发展的政治经济学解读[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020,51(5): 57-63. |
|
|
|
