|
|
|
| Research on the Impact of Organizational Modularity on Technology Transfer Performanceof Research-oriented Universities |
| Wang Haijun,Zhang Yue,Zhang Wengeng,Zhang Xuemin |
| (Shenyang University of Technology School of Management,Shenyang 110870，China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Technology transfer is an important tool for transforming social scientific and technological resources into real economic benefits. At present,there are significant problems in the technology transfer channel of China's research-oriented universities. The performance of technology transfer is not high,and the "last kilometer" of the successful industrialization of university scientific and technological achievements. Based on the actual needs and research gaps,a theoretical model of the impact of organizational modularity on technology transfer performance of research-oriented universities is established. On this basis,a survey was conducted on the samples of 38 research-oriented universities in China,and 543 valid questionnaires were collected. Furthermore,SPSS 24.0 and AMOS software are used for structural equation path analysis to demonstrate and test the influence mechanism of organizational modularizaty on technology transfer performance of research-oriented universities. The results show that organizational modularity has a positive and significant impact on technology transfer performance of research-oriented universities. Technological innovation capability plays a significant mediating role between organizational modularity and technology transfer performance. The moderating effect of knowledge sharing is mainly reflected in the relationship between organizational modularity independence,responsiveness and technological innovation capability. It has no significant effect on the relationship between organizational modularity of labor and technological innovation capability.
|
|
Received: 21 June 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 王世良. 技术转移概念刍议[J]. 管理工程学报,1987，10(1):34，76.[2] 埃里克·布莱恩约佛森，安德鲁·麦卡非.第二次机械革命[M].蒋永军，译.北京:中信出版社，2014.[3] 正言. 将科技优势转化为振兴发展新优势[J]. 共产党员,2021，73(5):24-25.[4] 池长昀. 大学科技园能力建设：知识转移更重要[N]. 中国科学报,2020-07-17(3).[5] 陈琨,李晓轩,杨国梁. 中外大学技术转移效率比较研究——基于DEA-Malmquist方法[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(7):98-106.[6] 冯华,单丽曼. 中国技术转移效率评价研究——基于Malmquist指数和Bootstrap-DEA的实证分析[J]. 学习与实践,2016，33(11):14-22.[7] 王方,李华. 基于DEA的中国区域技术转移效率评价[J]. 科研管理,2013,34(S1):153-160.[8] 张蕾,马占新. 基于Malmquist指数的“一带一路”省区高校技术转移效率研究[J].科学管理研究,2021,39(1):38-44.[9] 董洁,黄付杰. 中国科技成果转化效率及其影响因素研究——基于随机前沿函数的实证分析[J]. 软科学,2012,26(10):15-20.[10] 汤鹏翔,靳杰,郑可. 基于熵权灰色关联分析的高校技术交易行为评价——以A高校为例[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2016,46(9):113-120.[11] 赵喜仓,安荣花. 江苏省科技成果转化效率及其影响因素分析——基于熵值和随机前沿的实证分析[J]. 科技管理研究,2013,33(9):81-85.[12] 李丽云. 致公党中央:将高校成果转化作为评价应用研究的主要指标[N]. 科技日报,2017-03-08(6).[13] DESS G G, RASHEED A M A, MCLAUGHLIN K J, et al. The new corporate architecture[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1995, 9(3): 7-18.[14] BALDWIN C Y CLARK-K-B. The architecture of participation: does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model[J]. Management Science,2016,52(7): 1116-1127.[15] 王建安,张钢.组织模块化及其测量:一个基于松散耦合系统的分析框架[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2008，44(6):1-10.[16] JACOB M, HELLSTR?M T, ADLER N, et al. From sponsorship to partnership in academy‐industry relations[J]. R&D Management, 2000, 30(3): 255-262.[17] 王海军,王楠,陈劲.组织模块化嵌入的研究型大学技术转移[J]. 科学学研究,2019,37(5):845-855,960.[18] 斯维·万宁,李帅帅. 大学技术转移绩效测量研究[J]. 社会科学辑刊,2014，36(5):104-112.[19] 刘群彦,姚禹. 高校组织管理行为与技术转移绩效——基于34所教育部直属高校的实证分析[J]. 中国高校科技,2018，32（11）：12-17[20] SCHUMPETER J A.The theory of economic development [M].Transaction,1912.[21] MANSFIELD E.Industrial Research and Technological Innovation [M].Norton,1968.[22] 汪涛,杨雪梅.高校技术创新溢出能力对国家大学科技园孵化效率的影响[J/OL].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版):1-20[2021-10-10].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1178.n.20210923.2145.005.html.[23] 梁海山,魏江,万新明.企业技术创新能力体系变迁及其绩效影响机制——海尔开放式创新新范式[J].管理评论,2018,30(7):281-291[24] 曾婧婧,温永林,毕超.高校技术转移与企业技术转移对区域创新能力的差异性贡献——技术转移中心的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(6):84-91.[25] HANSEN M T. Special issue: knowledge,knowing,and organizations: knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies[J]. Organization Science,2002,13(3):232-248.[26] CABRERA A,CABRERA E F. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas[J]. Organization Studies,2002,23(5):687-710.[27] 魏江,王艳. 企业内部知识共享模式研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究,2004，25（1）：68-69.[28] LIN B W,BERG D. Effects of cultural difference on technology transfer projects: an empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturing companies[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2001,19(5)：287-293.[29] 仲理峰,时勘. 胜任特征研究的新进展[J]. 南开管理评论,2003，6(2):4-8.[30] 张莉. 知识粘性与技术转移绩效研究[D].天津 :天津大学,2009.[31] TIWANA AMRIT.Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance?a field study of software outsourcing alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2008,29(11):1241-1252.[32] SCHILLING M A.Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity[J].Academy of Management Review，2000,25(2)：312-334.[33] MIKKOLA J H,GASSMANN O. Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2003,50(2)：204-218.[34] PARNAS D L. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules[J]. Communications of the ACM,1972,15(12):1053-1058.[35] SANCHEZ R,MAHONEY J T.Modularity,flexibility,and knowledge management in product and organization design[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(S2):63-76.[36] LEE J-N. The impact of knowledge sharing,organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success[J]. Information & Management,2001,38(5):323-335.[37] HAGEDOORN J,CLOODT M.Measuring innovative performance:is there an advantage in using multiple indicators[J].Research Policy,2003,32(8)：1365-1379.[38] 中华人民共和国教育部. 2019年中国普通高等创新能力检测报告[R]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社,2019. |
|
|
|
