|
|
|
| TMT Heterogeneity,Team Conflict and Enterprise Green Performance：an Integrated Analysis Framework of the Moderating Effect of Diversity CEO Leadership Styles |
| Ren Xiangwei1,Sun Liwen1,Xing Liyun2 |
| （1.School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China;2.Business school, University of Jinan, Jinan 250002,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on upper echelons theory and so on, from the perspective of factors integration analysis, such as TMT heterogeneity, in view of the discussion on the mechanism of green performance driven by TMT, the paper tries to construct the theoretical model of TMT heterogeneity, team conflicts and enterprise green performance under the moderating of diversity CEO leadership styles.Using Bootstrapping, hierarchical regression and other methods to empirically test the driving factors' mechanism and boundaries of TMT heterogeneity.The results show that:①Both TMT heterogeneity and task conflicts have significant positive effects on promoting green performance of enterprises, and the task conflicts plays a part of intermediary effect in the relationship between TMT heterogeneity and enterprise green performance， while relationship conflicts have significant negative effect on enterprise green performance.It shows that heterogeneous top management team has more diverse ideas, the members of the top management team analyze and integrate these views, and then acting on green performance, however,while relationship conflicts between members can weaken the process；②The transformational CEO leadership style plays a negative moderating effect in the relationship between task conflict and enterprise green performance, it shows the importance of appropriate guidance and care, streamlining administration and instituting decentralization for transformational CEO, in order to ensure that the members of the top management team express their views fully. The transactional CEO leadership style also plays a negative moderating effect between relationship conflict and enterprise green performance,it indicates the reward and punishment are important measures for transactional CEO to reduce the intensity of emotional conflicts and enhance team cohesion.
|
|
Received: 18 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 黄速建,肖红军,王欣.论国有企业高质量发展[J].中国工业经济, 2018,35(10):19-41.[2] 逄锦聚,林岗,杨瑞龙,等.促进经济高质量发展笔谈[J].经济学动态,2019，59(7):3-19. [3] OUCHI W G, MAGUIRE M A. Organizational control: two functions[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1975,20:559-569.[4] BURNS J M.Leadership[M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.[5] AVOLIO B J, BASS B M, JUNG D J. Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,1999,72(4):441-462.[6] HAMBRICK D C, MASON P A. The organization as a reflection of its top managers[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1984,9(2):193-206.[7] 张金清,肖嘉琦.高管团队异质性与企业绩效研究综述[J].商业研究,2018,60(3) : 115-122+161.[8] FINKELSTEIN S, HAMBRICK D C. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990,35 (3):484-503.[9] LI X, DU J, LONG H. Understanding the green development behavior and performance of industrial enterprises (GDBP-IE): scale development and validation[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2020,17(5):1716.[10] WAGNER M.The link of environmental and economic performance: drivers and limitation of sustainability integration [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(6):1306-1317.[11] GONZáLEZ-BENITO J, GONZLEZ-BENITO . Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis[J]. Omega,2005,33(1):1-15.[12] LIU L. Top management characteristics, green supply chain management and corporate performance——moderating effects of competition intensity[J].Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies,2019,7(1):55-71.[13] WU J, RICHARD O C, ZHANG X H, et al.Top management team surface-level diversity, strategic change, and long-term firm performance: a mediated model investigation [J]. Journal of Leadership&Organizational Studies, 2019,26(3):304-318.[14] CHEN M H, CHANG Y Y, CHANG Y C. The trinity of entrepreneurial team dynamics: cognition,conflicts and cohesion [J].International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour＆Research, 2017,23(6):934-951.[15] DE DREU C K W. When too little or too much hurts: evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams [J]. Journal of Management, 2006,32(1):83-107. [16] LANGFRED C W. The downside of self-management: a longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50(4):885-900.[17] 孙丽文,任相伟. 层次结构网络嵌入、TMT异质性与企业绿色转型动因——跨层交互因素的整合分析框架[J].财经论丛, 2020,261(7):93-103.[18] AMASON A C. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(1):123-148.[19] VAN K D, DE DREU C K W, HOMAN A C.Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2004,89(6): 1008-1022.[20] NOTGRASS D, CONNER C, BELL T J. Leading external auditing teams: the correlation between leaders' behaviors and team dynamics of cohesion and conflict[J]. International Journal of Business & Public Administration,2013,10 (2):1-14. [21] 孟炎,田也壮.基于领导价值观的企业领导行为与其绩效关系的研究[J].管理学报,2015, 12(9):1313-1318.[22] 戴佩华.领导风格和团队冲突控制的实验研究[J].外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(2):82-92.[23] DU S, SWAEN V, LINDGREEN A, et al.The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, 114(1):155-169.[24] 孙丽文, 任相伟, 李翼凡. 战略柔性、绿色创新与企业绩效——动态环境规制下的交互和调节效应模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(22): 82-91.[25] 龚宏斌,罗青军.动态环境中的企业战略:主导逻辑及规则的应用[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2004, 25(7) :138-141.[26] 梅强,徐胜男.高层管理团队异质性、团队冲突和创业绩效的关系研究[J].经济与管理研究, 2012，32(6):94-103.[27] JEHN K A. The impact of intragroup conflict on group effectiveness: a multimethod examination of the benefits and determinants of conflict[J]. Administrative Science Quaterly, 1995, 40: 256-282.[28] 陈建勋,郑雪强,王涛.“对事不对人”抑或“对人不对事”——高管团队冲突对组织探索式学习行为的影响[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(5):91-103.[29] BUYL T, BOONE C, HENDRIKS W, et al.Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: the moderating role of CEO characteristics[J].Journal of Management Studies, 2011,48(1):151-177.[30] COLBERT A E, KRISTOF-BROWN A L, BRADLEY B H, et al. CEO transformational leadership: the role of goal importance congruence in top management teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2008, 51(1):81-96.[31] 马喜芳,颜世富.变革型领导一定比交易型领导更有效吗?CEO领导风格、组织激励对组织绩效的协同性研究[J].中国人力资源开发, 2015，28(19):47-55.[32] BERRY S S. Cocoa,custom and socio-economic change in rural western Nigeria[M]. Oxford：Clarendon Press, 1975.[33] 项益鸣,杨瑞萍,朱珊. TMT异质性对商业模式创新的影响：知识创造的中介作用[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(14):172-179.[34] 李超平,时勘.变革型领导的结构与测量[J].心理学报,2005,37(6):803-811.[35] 刘鑫,李小玉,薛有志.职能背景、团队冲突与企业创新[J].科学学研究,2020,38(2):357-372. |
|
|
|
