|
|
|
| The Influence of Core Enterprise Leadership Style on Cluster Innovation Performance:an Extended Study of Federer's Model at Cluster Level |
| Li Yu1,2,Hao Shangqi1,Bu Huidi1 |
| (1. School of Business Administration, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics; 2. Liaoning（Dalian）Institute of Free Trade Zone, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As the leader in the industrial cluster, core enterprises play a key role in the innovation of the cluster, but how the leadership style of core enterprises promotes the continuous innovation of the whole cluster has not been studied in depth. Based on the core of The Fiedler model, this paper reveals the influence of the matching of transactional leadership, transformational leadership and leadership situation on cluster innovation performance. The conclusions are that there is a positive relationship between core enterprise leadership style and cluster innovation performance. Inter-organizational trust, and knowledge power has a positive regulating effect on the relationship between transactional leadership, transformational leadership and cluster innovation performance in core enterprises, product modularization has a negative regulating effect on the relationship between transactional leadership, and cluster innovation performance in core enterprises, a positive regulating effect on the relationship between transformational leadership and cluster innovation performance. Under favorable and moderate circumstances, transformational leadership of core enterprises is more beneficial to cluster innovation performance than transactional leadership; under unfavorable circumstances, transactional leadership of core enterprises is more beneficial to cluster innovation performance than transformational leadership.
|
|
Received: 07 April 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] GIULIANI E.Role of technological gatekeepers in the growth of industrial clusters:evidence from Chile[J].Regional Studies,2011,45(10):1329-1348.[2] DEFEE C C.Supply chain leadership[M].knoxville：University of Tennessee, 2007.[3] 盛志君,牟晓伟.吉林省汽车产业集群升级问题及对策研究[J].经济视角,2016,35(1):23-28.[4] DEICHMANN D, STAM D.Leveraging transformational and transactional leadership to cultivate the generation of organization-focused ideas[J].The Leadership Quarterly,2015,26(2):204-219.[5] 孙国强,于燕琴,吉迎东.技术权力、组织间信任影响领导行为的跨案例研究:核心企业心理定位视角[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(4):90-96.[6] 王发明,朱美娟.领导企业治理下创新生态系统演进路径研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(9):84-90.[7] 宋晶,陈菊红,孙永磊.核心企业领导风格、组织间信任与合作创新绩效的关系研究[J].中国科技论坛,2013,29(11):73-78.[8] 吴松强,孙波,王路.集群中核心企业网络权力对配套企业合作行为的影响:关系资本的调节效应[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(13):81-88.[9] 刘会,宋华,冯云霞.产品模块化与供应链整合的适配性关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(9):93-104.[10] OJHA D,ACHARYA C,COOPER D.Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity:mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2018,197:215-231.[11] DHANARAJ C,PARKHE A.Orchestrating innovation networks[J].Academy of Management Review,2006,31(3):659-669.[12] 谢永平,王晶,李尧,等.核心企业领导风格、网络承诺对网络绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(7):88-96.[13] 何伟怡,张娉娉.核心企业领导风格与弱稳定性的工程供应链信息共享：关系质量的中介作用[J].南开管理评论,2020,23(1):107-117.[14] MIAO Q,NEWMAN A,LAMB P.Transformational leadership and the work outcomes of Chinese migrant workers:the mediating effects of identification with leader[J].Leadership,2012,8(4):377-395.[15] 冯彩玲.差异化变革型领导对员工创新行为的跨层次影响[J].管理评论,2017,29(5):120-130.[16] 孙永磊,党兴华.基于知识权力的网络惯例形成研究[J].科学学研究,2013,31(9):1372-1380,1390.[17] POPP M,HADWICH K.Examining the effects of employees' behaviour by transferring a leadership contingency theory to the service context[J].Journal of Service Management Research,2018,2(3):44-62.[18] 孙永磊,宋晶,谢永平.调节定向对创新网络惯例的影响:基于组织间信任的情景分析[J].科研管理,2016,37(8):1-7.[19] COLQUITT J A,LEPINE J A,ZAPATA C P,et al.Trust in typical and high-reliability contexts:building and reacting to trust among firefighters[J].Academy of Management Journal,2011,54(5):999-1015.[20] CAMPAGNOLO D,CAMUFFO A.The concept of modularity in management studies:a literature review[J].International Journal of Management Reviews,2010,12(3):259-283.[21] 曹虹剑,张建英,刘丹.模块化分工、协同与技术创新:基于战略性新兴产业的研究[J].中国软科学,2015,30(7):100-110.[22] CABIGIOSU A,ZIRPOLI F,CAMUFFO A.Modularity,interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry[J].Research Policy,2013,42(3):662-675.[23] 陈建勋,张婷婷,吴隆增.产品模块化对组织绩效的影响:中国情境下的实证研究[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):121-130.[24] KUNZLE B,ZALA-MEZO E,KOLBE M,et al.Substitutes for leadership in anaesthesia teams and their impact on leadership effectiveness[J].European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,2010,19(5):505-531.[25] NEUBERT M J,HUNTER E M,TOLENTINO R C.A servant leader and their stakeholders:when does organizational structure enhance a leader's influence[J].The Leadership Quarterly,2016,27(6):896-910.[26] RICE R W,CHEMERS M M.Predicting the emergence of leaders using Fiedler's contingency model of leadership effectiveness[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1973,57(3):281-287.[27] 肖静华,谢康.组合与单一治理对供应链信息系统价值创造的影响[J].管理科学,2010,23(4):86-94.[28] WANG P,RODE J C.Transformational leadership and follower creativity:the moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate[J].Human Relations,2010,63(8):1105-1128.[29] BASKARADA S,WATSON J,CROMARTY J.Balancing transactional and transformational leadership[J].International Journal of Organizational Analysis,2017,25(3):506-515.[30] 李宇,陆艳红.知识权力如何有效运用:“有核”集群的知识创造及权力距离的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(6):107-120.[31] 李卫国,钟书华.创新集群绩效评价:以欧洲IT集群为例[J].科技与经济,2010,23(3):15-18. |
|
|
|
