|
|
To Study the Relationship between University Patents Transformation with Their Bibliometrics Characteristics |
Li Rui1,Fan Jiujiang2 |
(1.Institute of Disaster Management and Reconstruction,Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China;2.School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China) |
|
|
Abstract How to identify the potential patens which are able to be transformed from a large number of universities patents would be a significant research thesis for the science and technology management and evaluation departments.As universities do not have production capacity, the assignment or licensing of patents plays an important role in the transformation of university patents. Using multivariate statistical "gap analysis" and "correlation analysis" method to compare the university patents which were transformed through assignment or licensing with those which were not, from the perspective of bibliometrics, we can find the correlation between university patents' ability of being transformed and their bibliometrics characteristics.Taking Sichuan University's 16 491 patents as sample, we discovered a series of correlations and summarized the correlations into several truths as the references for identifying the potential patens which tent to be transformed, from the perspective of bibliometrics.
|
Received: 04 August 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] XU HAIYUN, WANG CHAO, DONG KUN, et al. A study of methods to identify industry-university-research institution cooperation partners based on innovation chain theory[J]. Journal of Data & Information Science, 2018, 3(2):40-63.[2]GRAF H, HENNING T. Public research in regional networks of innovators:a comparative study of four east German regions[J]. Regional Studies,2009,43(10):1349-1368.[3]IPIRANGA A, PRISCILLA. The kinds of research and the cooperation among university, business and government: an analysis in the northeast biotechnology network[J]. Organ Soc, 2012,19(60):17-34.[4]尹西明,王毅,陈劲.高校创造的知识转移到哪去了——对我国高校专利许可的时空分布研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(6):12-22.[5]马晓雅,谢祥,李志鹏,等.高校专利权转移的网络结构和影响因素分析——基于2016年北京、江苏、陕西高校专利权转移的实证[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(12):132-138.[6]康旭东,张玮,王宇开,等.基于发明专利转让数据的校-企技术转移特征研究[J].科学与管理,2020,40(2):10-19.[7]谭龙,刘云,侯媛媛.我国高校专利实施许可的实证分析及启示[J].研究与发展管理,2013,25(3):117-123. [8]李强,顾新.我国高校许可专利与专利权转让专利的对比分析[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(20):88-93.[9]叶静怡,杨洋,韩佳伟,等.中美高校技术转移效率比较——基于专利的视角[J].中国科技论坛,2015,31(1):150-155.[10] 李志鹏,谢祥,肖尤丹.基于专利转让的“双一流”大学知识转化能力研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2018,14(8):53-59.[11]顾瑞婷.专利分析助力高校成果转化——以盐城工学院为例[J].企业科技与发展,2019,35(10):22-24,27. [12]张晓月,安秋凡,甄伟军.转化视角下的高校专利价值研究——基于“一流大学”建设高校发明授权专利的数据[J].中国高校科技,2019,33(3):69-73.[13]陈振英,陈国钢,殷之明.专利视角下高校科技创新水平比较——“十一五”期间我国C9大学的发明专利文献计量分析[J].情报杂志,2013,32(7):143-147.[14]李睿,赵峰.届满专利与无效专利的施引特征对比及其情报学意义[J].情报学报,2016,35(6):586-596.[15]PAOLA C, BART V. Does it matter where patent citations come from? inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents[J]. Research Policy, 28,37(10): 1892-1908.[16]余敏,王震宇,江耀纯.浅析创造性判断中下位概念对上位概念的影响[J].专利代理,2016,2(4):49-52.[17]BERTRAN F J L. Patents, citation and the market value of innovations[D].Rochester:University of Rochester,2004.[18]KAPOOR R, KARVONEN M, RANAEI S, et al. Patent portfolios of European wind industry: new insights using citation categories[J]. World Patent Information, 2015, 41(6):4-10.[19]林德明,孙建松,郝涛,等.专利引用在专利价值评价中的适用性研究[J].情报杂志,2016,35(12):150-154.[20]周维,李睿.基于技术链的专利引用关系计量及其意义[J].情报杂志,2016,35(8):114-121.[21]许治,陈丽玉,王思卉.高校科研团队合作程度影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(5):149-161.[22]PEARCE C L,HERBIK P A. Citizenship behavior at the team level of analysis: the effects of team leadership,team commitment,perceived team support,and team size[J].The Journal of Social Psychology,2004,144(3): 293-310.[23]贺远琼,陈昀.不确定环境中高管团队规模与企业绩效关系的实证研究——基于中国制造业上市公司的证据[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(2):123-128.[24]李纲,刘先红.科研团队中学术带头人的合作特征及其对科研产出的影响[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(6):70-75.[25]张克群,牛悾悾,夏伟伟.高被引专利质量的影响因素分析——以LED产业为例[J].情报杂志,2018,37(2):81-87.[26]REITZIG M. On the effectiveness of novelty and inventive step as patentability requirements structural empirical evidence using patent indicators. [EB/OL].[2020-04-10].http://ssrn.com/abstract=745568.[27]谢芳,陈劲.许可经历对企业专利质量的影响——基于专利引用的分析[J].中国科技论坛,2017,33(10):135-144.[28]李睿.专利被引频次和施引频次与专利价值的相关性解析——以在美注册的中国专利为样本[J].情报学报,2014,33(4):396-404.[29]张敏,吴郁松,霍朝光.科研团队显性知识和隐性知识共享意愿影响因素的对比分析[J].图书馆学研究,2016,38(13):90-97. |
|
|
|