NVC龙企功能升级模式演进及机理纵向案例研究——技术自主性视角

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2020120682

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY

2021, Vol. 38

Issue (16): 1-10 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020120682

Innovation in Science and Technology Management

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

A Longitudinal Case Study of Evolution Mechanism of Functional Upgrade Modes Adopted by Leader Firms in NVC:from Technology Autonomy Perspective

Liu Qian^1,2,Jiang Nan³,Dai fengyan⁴

(1. Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;2. Institute of Intellectual Property, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China;3. Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092,China;4. School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance & Economics, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (2531 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The independent control of core technology of domestic leader firms have become a key problem for restricting NVC function upgrading. Based on literature review, this paper defines that technological autonomy consists of capability autonomy and property right autonomy, and the function upgrade modes of NVC leader firms are divided according to the product platform and technology track. Based on the analysis framework of "dynamic capabilities-strategic objectives-upgrade mode-competitive advantage", selecting Huawei HiSilicon as the object of longitudinal case, this paper explores the evolution mechanism of function upgrade mode of the NVC leader firms from the perspective of technological autonomy.

Key words： NVC Leader Firm Function Upgrade Technological Autonomy Dynamic Capability Model Evolution

Received: 24 December 2020

ZTFLH:

F273.1

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Liu Qian
	Jiang Nan
	Dai fengyan

Cite this article:

Liu Qian,Jiang Nan,Dai fengyan. A Longitudinal Case Study of Evolution Mechanism of Functional Upgrade Modes Adopted by Leader Firms in NVC:from Technology Autonomy Perspective[J]. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2021, 38(16): 1-10.

URL:

http://www.kjjb.org/EN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2020120682 OR http://www.kjjb.org/EN/Y2021/V38/I16/1

[1] 刘志彪,张杰. 全球代工体系下发展中国家俘获型网络的形成、突破与对策:基于GVC与NVC的比较视角[J]. 中国工业经济,2007,24(5):39-47.
[2] KAPLINSKY R, MORRIS M. A handbook for value chain research[R]. Paper for the IDRC, 2002.
[3] HUMPHREY J,SCHMITZ H.Governance and upgrading:linking industrial cluster and global value chain research[M].Brighton:University of Sussex,2000:3-4.
[4] 郑琼娥. 基于全球价值网格构建的本土代工企业升级机理研究[D].泉州:华侨大学,2014.
[5] 苏敬勤,高昕. 中国制造企业的低端突破路径演化研究[J]. 科研管理,2019,40(2):86-96.
[6] 吴永亮,王恕立. 中美GVC和NVC视角产业关联对比分析:基于非竞争型投入产出数据[J]. 国际贸易问题,2019，45(4):125-142.
[7] 张化尧,李德扬,谢洪明. 技术截断下的中国民营汽车企业能力升级研究:以奇瑞、比亚迪和吉利为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(2):122-130.
[8] HUMPHREY J,SCHMITZ H. How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters[J]. Regional Studies,2002,36(9):1017-1027.
[9] GEREFFI G. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain[J]. Journal of International Economics,1999,48(1):37-70.
[10] GEREFFI G,HUMPHREY J,KAPLINSKY R,et al. Introduction:globalisation,value chains and development[J]. IDS Bulletin,2001,32(3):1-8.
[11] HOBDAY M. East Asian latecomer firms:learning the technology of electronics[J]. World Development,1995,23(7):1171-1193.
[12] 陈劲,陈钰芬. 开放创新条件下的资源投入测度及政策含义[J]. 科学学研究,2007,25(2):352-359.
[13] 童时中.模块化设计原理、方法与应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2000.
[14] 路风. 论产品开发平台[J]. 管理世界,2018,34(8):106-129,192.
[15] 杨桂菊,刘善海. 从OEM到OBM:战略创业视角的代工企业转型升级:基于比亚迪的探索性案例研究[J]. 科学学研究,2013,31(2):240-249.
[16] 武建龙,王宏起,李力. 模块化动态背景下我国新兴产业技术创新机会、困境与突破:基于我国手机产业技术创新演变史的考察[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(6):45-57.
[17] 孙宇. 基于中国情境的技术创新对技术轨道跃迁的影响研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2016.
[18] 杨晨,刘谦,戴凤燕. 产业安全型专利运营探析:模式、结构与机理:基于扎根理论的多案例研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2018,35(7):18-26.
[19] 刘维林. 产品架构与功能架构的双重嵌入:本土制造业突破GVC低端锁定的攀升途径[J]. 中国工业经济,2012,29(1):152-160.
[20] 苏敬勤,林菁菁,张雁鸣. 企业产品平台独立性差异及影响机理:一个对比案例研究[J]. 科研管理,2019,40(10):220-229.
[21] LANCE A, SCOTT L. Innovating on the cheap[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2011,89(6):88-94.
[22] BRACH J,KAPPEL R T. Global value chains,technology transfer and local firm upgrading in non-OECD countries[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal,2009:13(10).
[23] TEECE D J,PISANO G,SHUEN A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7):509-533.
[24] 刘志彪,张杰. 从融入全球价值链到构建国家价值链:中国产业升级的战略思考[J]. 学术月刊,2009,41(9):59-68.
[25] LANGEN P, NIJDAM M. Leader firms in the dutch maritime cluster[C]. European Regional Science Association, 2003.
[26] 王建军,曹宁,叶明海. 核心企业治理机制对模块化网络创新绩效的影响:知识转移的中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020,37(3):115-123.
[27] 刘友金,罗发友. 基于焦点企业成长的集群演进机理研究:以长沙工程机械集群为例[J]. 管理世界,2005,21(10):159-161.
[28] 吴应宇,丁胜红. 营改增对产业结构升级与NVC塑造的驱动效应研究[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,16(4):54-58,135.
[29] NAVAS-ALEMN L. The impact of operating in multiple value chains for upgrading:the case of the Brazilian furniture and footwear industries[J]. World Development,2011,39(8):1386-1397.
[30] 康德.实践理性研究[M].北京:人民出版社, 2003.
[31] EMMANUEL M. Autonomous technology: technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought: Landon Winner[J]. American Political Science Review,1978,72(4):1396-1397.
[32] 蔡新蕾,高山行,徐新. 企业自主技术创新测度及不同创新模式作用研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2014,31(1):116-122.
[33] 路风,余永定. “双顺差”、能力缺口与自主创新:转变经济发展方式的宏观和微观视野[J]. 中国社会科学,2012，33(6):91-114,207.
[34] 陈爱贞,李舜,刘承翊. 企业技术创新模式选择:自主学习还是合作[J]. 东南学术,2018，31(1):129-140.
[35] 吕铁,江鸿. 从逆向工程到正向设计:中国高铁对装备制造业技术追赶与自主创新的启示[J]. 经济管理,2017,39(10):6-19.
[36] 张煜,龙勇. 技术集成下模块化产品创新实现路径研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2018,35(13):102-109.
[37] 严北战. 集群式产业链、技术轨道与自主创新能力提升研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2014,31(1):65-70.