|
|
|
| Research Status and Development Trend of Patent Litigation at Home and Abroad |
| Liu Xing1,Jiang Nan1,Ma Yiwen1,Yi Yongfeng2 |
| (1.Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property，Tongji University，Shanghai 200092,China;2.Hunan Zhong Yi Law Firm，Changsha 410016,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Taking 669 articles published in 2000—2020 collected by web of science core database (SSCI) and CNKI core database (CSSCI) as research samples, this paper adopts bibliometrics and R language programming tools to analyze the overall context, hot research progress and research frontier of patent litigation at home and abroad. The results show that patent litigation research has become an important interdisciplinary research field. The United States is the leading country in patent litigation research, and the gap between domestic and foreign publications is increasing. There are stable journal groups in China, and the specific topics concerned by domestic institutions are different.The evolution of research hotspots at home and abroad can be divided into three stages. At the present stage, foreign research shows the characteristics of wide research scope, multiple objects, advanced methods and deepening degree, while domestic research is characterized by the combination of foreign research framework and theoretical methods with China's specific national conditions and practice.The frontier of joint research at home and abroad is patent troll and innovation, while there are some differences in other aspects.Based on the research conclusions, targeted suggestions are given to such as strengthen interdisciplinary research, keep up with international trends, and increase the analysis of national conditions.
|
|
Received: 22 December 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 毛昊,尹志锋.我国多次诉讼专利的基本特征与审判结果[J].科研管理,2019,40(4):190-202.[2] REPISO R, AHEDO J, MONTERO J. The presence of the encyclicals in Web of Science: a bibliometric approach[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(1): 487-500.[3] 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace 知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253.[4] 孙威, 王晓楠, 盛科荣. 基于文献计量方法的国内外城市更新比较研究[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1300-1309.[5] LIU W, WEI W, YAN X, et al. Sustainability risk management in a smart logistics ecological chain: an evaluation framework based on social network analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276: 124189.[6] DENG G, LU F, WU L, et al. Social network analysis of virtual water trade among major countries in the world[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 753: 142043.[7] 丁雪辰, 柳卸林. 基于文献计量分析的国内外学术创业研究现状与热点趋势评析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(5): 22-41.[8] CHEN Y, WU C. The hot spot transformation in the research evolution of maker[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(3): 1307-1324.[9] 马翠嫦,吴育冰.寻求信息偶遇研究的突破——基于近20年来国内外信息偶遇学术论文的知识图谱分析[J].现代情报,2020,40(12):156-169.[10] 李玉刚,吴朋,叶凯月,等.制度情境差异对企业成长的影响研究热点与趋势——基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J].科技进步与对策，2020,37(19):151-160.[11] HARHOFF D，REITZIG M. Determinants of opposition against EPO patent grants：the case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2004, 22(4): 443-480.[12] ARROW A K. Intangible asset deployment in technology-rich companies: how does innovation affect return on assets[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2002, 24(4): 375-390.[13] LANJOUW J O, SCHANKERMAN M. Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2001,32(1): 129-151.[14] RAGHU T S, WOO W, MOHAN S B, et al. Market reaction to patent infringement litigations in the information technology industry[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2008, 10(1): 61-75.[15] SCHNEIDER C. The battle for patent rights in plant biotechnology: evidence from opposition fillings[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, 36(5): 565-579.[16] YANG X, YU X. Preventing patent risks in artificial intelligence industry for sustainable development: a multi-level network analysis[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(20): 8667.[17] WRIGHT J D, GINSBURG D H. Patent assertion entities and antitrust: a competition cure for a litigation disease[J]. Antitrust LJ, 2014, 79(2): 501-526.[18] 陈展.企业专利诉讼策略的应用及防御[J].知识产权,2005,19(4):34-36.[19] 胡海平.关于专利无效宣告案件相关法律问题的探讨[J].情报杂志,2004,23(10):66-67,70.[20] 岳贤平,王娟.国外企业“专利悖论”行为及其政策启示[J].科研管理,2010,31(6):73-79.[21] 余翔,张玉蓉.金融专利新战略:“专利钓饵”及其防范[J].研究与发展管理,2008,20(3):100-105.[22] 黎薇.企业专利诉讼战略:国外研究述评[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(1):156-160.[23] 贺宁馨,袁晓东.专利钓饵对中国专利制度的挑战及其防范措施研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(1):12-19.[24] 毛昊,尹志锋,张锦.策略性专利诉讼模式:基于非专利实施体多次诉讼的研究[J].中国工业经济,2017,34(2):136-153.[25] 罗蓉蓉.美国医药专利诉讼中“反向支付”的反垄断规制及其启示[J].政治与法律,2012(12):141-149.[26] YANG D. Patent litigation strategy and its effects on the firm[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2019, 21(4): 427-446.[27] COHEN L, GURUN U G, KOMINERS S D. Patent trolls: evidence from targeted firms[J]. Management Science,2019,65(12): 5461-5486.[28] JONES S L, LEIPONEN A, VASUDEVA G. The evolution of cooperation in the face of conflict: evidence from the innovation ecosystem for mobile telecom standards development[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2020,42(4):710-740.[29] KRASTEVA S, SHARMA P, WANG C. Patent policy, imitation incentives, and the rate of cumulative innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2020, 178: 509-533.[30] 高建刚.谁是专利蟑螂:基于美国非专利实施体的研究[J].情报杂志,2020,39(11):61-67.[31] 朱雪忠,彭祥飞.论专利侵权诉讼滥用的规制:价值与模式[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,49(4):49-57.[32] 毛昊.中国专利制度经济学:从学科融合到科学决策[J].科学学研究,2020,38(11):1976-1986.[33] 张运生,赖流滨,戴海闻.专利池重复联盟能否减少合作伙伴间专利诉讼[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(1):38-46.[34] 潘越,潘健平,戴亦一.专利侵权诉讼与企业创新[J].金融研究,2016,37(8):191-206.[35] 毛昊, 陈大鹏, 尹志锋. 中国专利保护“双轨制”路径完善的理论分析与实证检验[J]. 中国软科学, 2019,34(9):1-17. |
|
|
|
