|
|
An Evaluation of Coupling Effect of Science and Technology |
Lu Yuting1,Zhou Xiaoliang2 |
(1.Fujian Academy of Social Sciences, Fuzhou 350001,China; 2.School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350008,China) |
|
|
Abstract Considering the complexity of the current innovation environment, the coupling system of science and technology has become an open system that evolves under the influence of both internal and external factors. A state space model for the coupling system is constructed. By solving the model, the intensity of scientific technicalization and technological scientificization are described, and the complementary effect and cost effect of science and technology interaction are analyzed. Based on it, the coupling effect of science and technology of 29 provinces is evaluated, and the type of coupling path of sci-technology development in different regions is measured. The conclusions show that the evolutionary effects of the process of scientific technicalization and technological scientificization in different provinces are significantly different, and it doesn’t mean that the better the coupling effect is, the faster the development of science and technology is. The path in most provinces is sci-tech-balanced path, and the path with the smallest proportion is tech-strong path.At last the pointed are proposed .
|
Received: 16 April 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] AGHION P, HOWITT P.Research and development in the growth process[J].Journal of Economic Growth, 1996, 1(1):49-73.[2] BUSH V.Science: the endless frontier[M].Washington D C: National Science, 1945.[3] 巴萨拉.技术发展简史[M].周光发, 译.上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2000.[4] MUNOS B.Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation[J].Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2009, 8(12): 959-967.[5] 马琳.海德格尔论现代性纪元中科学与技术逆转的关系[J].学术月刊, 2015, 47(6): 42-50.[6] 刘则渊, 陈悦.新巴斯德象限: 高科技政策的新范式[J].管理学报, 2007, 4(3): 346-353.[7] 毛建儒, 王颖斌.论文艺复兴与科学技术发展的“隐路径”[J].自然辩证法研究, 2012, 28(12): 80-85.[8] 林苞.科学—技术的汇合与分离: 演化的视角[J].科学学研究, 2014, 32(7): 970-975.[9] VERBEEK A, DEBACKERE K, LUWEL M, et al.Linking science to technology: using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes[J].Scientometrics, 2002, 54(3): 399-420.[10] GUAN J C, HE Y.Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science-technology linkages[J].Scientometrics, 2007, 72(3): 403-425.[11] 吴菲菲, 黄鲁成, 石媛嫄.基于文献和专利相互引用的科学与技术关系分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34(10): 13-20.[12] 杜建, 孙轶楠, 李永洁, 等.从科学—技术交叉处识别创新前沿: 方法与实证[J].情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(1): 94-99.[13] BERNARDES A T,ALBUQUERQUE E.Cross-over, thre sholds,and interactions between science and technology lessons for less-developed countries[J].Research Policy, 2003, 32(5): 865-885.[14] GAO X, GUAN J.Networks of scientific journals: an exploration of Chinese patent data[J].Scientometrics, 2009, 80(1): 285-304.[15] 董珏, 杨眉, 郭晶, 等.面向高校科技转化效率评估的“科学—技术”关联性实证研究[J].大学图书馆学报, 2016, 34(5): 38-45.[16] 杜斌, 徐飞.中美大学科学研究与技术创新关联度的差异分析及启示[J].科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(23): 149-154.[17] 樊霞, 宋丽.基于科学的创新与产业技术能力构建——基于中日美生物技术产业的比较分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(3): 3-11.[18] ZHAO Q J, GUAN J C.Love dynamics between science and technology: some evidences in nanoscience and nanotechnology[J].Scientometrics, 2013, 94(1): 113-132.[19] CHAVES C V, MORO S.Investigating the interaction and mutual dependence between science and technology[J].Research Policy, 2007, 36(8): 1204-1220.[20] 陈悦, 宋超, 徐芳.我国“科学-技术-经济”产出的动态关系测度研究——基于“科学-技术”交互的视角[J].科研管理, 2019, 40(1): 12-21.[21] 李醒民.科学和技术关系的历史演变[J].科学, 2007, 59(6): 28-32.[22] 徐庆瑞.研究、发展与技术创新管理[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2010:5-6.[23] 卢馨.企业人力资本、R&D与自主创新——基于高新技术上市企业的经验证据[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013, 35(1): 104-117.[24] 逄淑媛, 陈德智.专利与研发经费的相关性研究: 基于全球研发顶尖公司10年面板数据的研究[J].科学学研究, 2009, 27(10): 1500-1505.[25] 梁莱歆, 马如飞.R&D资金管理与企业自主创新——基于我国信息技术类上市公司的实证分析[J].财经研究, 2009, 35(8): 49-59.[26] 毛建儒, 王颖斌.论文艺复兴与科学技术发展的“隐路径”[J].自然辩证法研究, 2012, 28(12): 80-85. |
|
|
|