|
|
|
| Mode Innovation of Technology Transfer Organization:Path Expansion based on Boundary Organization |
| Xu Ke1,Liu Haibo2,3,Zhang Yafeng2 |
| (1.School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,Shandong University,Qingdao 266237,China;2.School of Public Policy and Management（School of Intellectual Property),UCAS，Beijing 100049,China;3.Institutes of Science and Development, CAS, Beijing 100190, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Technology transfer is not only an important way to promote the development of science and technology, but also a strategic task to build an innovative country and achieve high-quality economic development. Technology Transfer Organization（TTO） is the professional service force to promote technology transfer. However, there are many TTO in China, but there are still many defects. As a type of organization originated from sociology of science, boundary organization has a strong organizational advantage in eliminating the phenomenon of social boundary in cross-border activities. Based on the perspective of boundary organization, this paper extends the boundary organization to the field of technology transfer, constructs the theoretical model of the boundary organization mode of TTO, compares it with the existing mode, analyzes the mechanism and advantages of the boundary organization mode in detail, and puts forward the future conception of boundary organization mode of TTO according to the practical experience of the boundary organization mode and the science, technology and innovation situation in China.
|
|
Received: 25 March 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 王耀德,艾志红.基于信号博弈的产学研协同创新的技术转移模型分析[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(12):23-27.[2] 华冬芳,蒋伏心.技术转移中的信任生成机理研究[J].南京社会科学,2016，27(9):17-23.[3] HELLMANN T.The role of patents for bridging the science to market gap[J].Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2007,63(4):624-647.[4] 吴净.国家技术转移示范机构能力结构与提升策略研究[J].科学管理研究,2019,37(4):41-46.[5] 朱雪忠,李闯豪.AUTM的新发展及其对我国构建大学技术转移信息平台的启示[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(16):166-171.[6] 林洪,盛建新,牛婧红,等.技术转移机构服务模式与服务类别比较研究——以湖北省27家技术转移示范机构为例[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(12):50-53.[7] 郭曼,朱常海,邵翔,等.中国技术转移机构的发展策略研究——基于能力升级的视角[J].中国科技论坛,2018,34(1):16-23.[8] 陈俐,冯楚健,陈荣,等.英国促进科技成果转移转化的经验借鉴——以国家技术创新中心和高校产学研创新体系为例[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(15):9-14.[9] HORNER S,JAYAWARNA D,GIORDANO B.Strategic choice in universities: managerial agency and effective technology transfer[J].Research Policy,2019,48(5): 1297-1309.[10] 陈娟,李建清.非营利科研机构技术转移网络治理研究——以德国弗朗霍夫学会为例[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(12):24-29.[11] CASTILLO F,GILLESS J K,HEIMAN A,et al.Time of adoption and intensity of technology transfer: an institutional analysis of offices of technology transfer in the United States[J].The Journal of Technology Transfer,2018,43(1): 120-138.[12] MOORE K.Organizing integrity: American science and the creation of public interest organizations,1955-1975[J].AJS，1996,101(6):1592-1627.[13] GUSTON D H.Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization [J].Social Studies of Science,1999,29（1）:87-111.[14] 尼尔·保尔森,赫尼斯.组织边界管理[M].佟博,译.北京:经济管理出版社,2005.[15] DUNCAN B,CARTER H,KNIGHT E,et al.Boundary organizations: creating a unique model for sustained dialog among scientists and decison makers about long-term change[C].Agu Fall Meeting,2015.[16] LEINHOS M.The US national bioethics advisory commission as a boundary organization[J].Science and Public Policy,2005,32(6): 423-433.[17] LVBRAND E.Pure science or policy involvement? ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science[J].Environmental Science & Policy,2007,10(1):39-47.[18] LEHOUX P,DAUDELIN G,DENIS J L,et al.Scientists and policy-makers at work: listening to epistemic conversations in a genetics science network[J].Science & Public Policy,2008,35(3):207-220.[19] 朱旭峰,贾杨.研究基金机构在中国智库建设中的作用：“边界组织”的视角[J].社会科学文摘,2019,17(10):117-119.[20] 樊春良,马小亮.科技与政策之间的边界组织[J].科学学研究,2018,36(8):1353-1359，1420.[21] 邵邦,刘庆莲.中科院国家技术转移机构技术转移模式研究[J].科技和产业,2017,17(3):128-131.[22] 龚雪媚,汪凌勇.技术转移机构的运行模式与绩效影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(23):105-110.[23] 郝金磊,尹萌.时空差异视角下我国科技协同创新与经济增长[J].经济与管理评论,2019,35(6):146-158. |
| [1] |
. [J]. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2014, 31(12): 50-53. |
|
|
|
|
