|
|
Research on the Relationship between Family Participation Heterogeneity and Family Business Innovation Performance |
Li Yanshuang,Yan Xiaojing,Dong Shaohua |
(School of economics and management,Hebei University of technology,Tianjin 300401,China) |
|
|
Abstract Based on the data of A-share family businesses in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchange during the period 2013-2019,establish a relationship model between family participation and enterprise innovation performance,focusing on the intermediary role of R&D investment,and explore the impact mechanism of family participation on enterprise innovation performance.Among them,family participation is redefined as family ownership participation,management authority participation and intergenerational inheritance participation.According to the scope of innovation achievements,innovation performance includes technology innovation performance and product innovation performance.The research indicates that:①family management rights participation and intergenerational inheritance participation has a positive effect on corporate R&D investment and innovation performance.Family ownership participation will inhibit R&D investment and have no significant influence on the company's innovation performance;②R&D investment shows some intermediary role,the involvement of family management rights and intergenerational inheritance has an indirect impact on the enterprises innovation performance through R&D investment.Therefore,it is suggested that family businesses should reduce the involvement degree of family ownership properly,abandon the thinking logic of balancing enterprise innovation with restricted social emotional wealth,and increase the intensity of R&D investment to promote the improvement of enterprise innovation performance.
|
Received: 27 August 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] ALEGRE,JOAQUN,CHIVA R.Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance[J].Journal of Small Business Management,2013,51(4):491-507.[2] HAGEDOORN J,CLOODT M.Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators[J].Research Policy,2003,32(8):1365-1379.[3] 杨林,段牡钰,刘娟,等.高管团队海外经验、研发投入强度与企业创新绩效[J].科研管理,2018,39(6):9-21.[4] 沈海华.技术学习对创新绩效的影响因素分析[D].杭州:浙江大学,2006.[5] DONCKELS R,ERWIN FRHLICH.Are family businesses really different? European experiences from Stratos[J].Family Business Review,1991,4(2):149-160.[6] 温思雅.董事会独立性、家族涉入与公司绩效[C].公司治理分会场论文集,2011:40-48.[7] SCIASCIA S,MAZZOLA P.Family involvement in ownership and management: exploring nonlinear effects on performance[J].Family Business Review,2008,21(4):331-345.[8] 窦军生,王宁,张玲丽.家族涉入对企业多元化及其价值效应的影响研究[J].南方经济,2017,35(3):1-22+120.[9] 毕立华,张俭,杨志强,石本仁.家族涉入程度、环境不确定性与技术创新[J].南方经济,2018,36(5):85-103.[10] CHRISMAN J J,PATEL P C.Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives[J].Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(4):976-997.[11] 杨学儒,李新春.家族涉入指数的构建与测量研究[J].中国工业经济,2009,26(8):97-107.[12] 朱沆,ERIC KUSHINS,周影辉.社会情感财富抑制了中国家族企业的创新投入吗[J].管理世界,2016,32(3):99-114.[13] 周立新.家族涉入与家族企业创新能力:中国制造业家族企业的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2014,26(1):136-144.[14] SIRMON D G,HITT M A.Managing resources: linking unique resources,management,and wealth creation in family firms[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(4):339-358.[15] 张玉明,李荣,闵亦杰.家族涉入、多元化战略与企业研发投资[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(23):72-77.[16] GMEZ-MEJA L R,CAMPBELL J T,MARTIN G,et al.Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble:revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency mode[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2014(6):1351-1374.[17] BHAUMIK S K,GREGORIOU A.'family' ownership,tunnelling and earnings management: a review of the literature[J].Journal of Economic Surveys,2010,24(4):705-730.[18] MANSO G .Motivating innovation[J].Journal of Finance,2011,66(5):1823-1860.[19] 严若森,钱向阳,肖莎,等.家族涉入的异质性对企业研发投入的影响研究——市场化程度与政治关联的调节作用[J].中国软科学,2019,34(11):129-138.[20] 严若森,吴梦茜.二代涉入、制度情境与中国家族企业创新投入——基于社会情感财富理论的研究[J].经济管理,2020,42(3):23-39.[21] ASTRACHAN J H,KLEIN A B,SMYRNIOS K X.The F-PEC scale of family influence: a proposal for solving the family business definition problem[J].Family Business Review,2002,15(1):45-58.[22] MASSIS A D,FRATTINI F,PIZZURNO E,et al.Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: an exploratory analysis[J].Journal of Small Business Management,2015,53(1):1-36.[23] MATZLER K,VEIDER V,HAUTZ J,et al.The impact of family ownership,management,and governance on innovation[J].Journal of product innovation management,2015,32(3):319-333.[24] MILLER DAN,LE BRETON-MILLER,Isabelle,et al.Deconstructing socioemotional wealth[J].Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice,2014,38(4):713-720.[25] 黄海杰,吕长江,朱晓文.二代介入与企业创新——来自中国家族上市公司的证据[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(1):6-16.[26] 郭超.子承父业还是开拓新机——二代接班者价值观偏离与家族企业转型创业[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2013,53(2):189-198.[27] SCIASCIA S,NORDQVIST M,MAZZOLA P,et al.Family ownership and R&D intensity in small-and medium-sized firms[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2015,32(3): 349-360.[28] 张俭,何爱玲.家族涉入与企业创新——基于涉入维度的理论探讨[J].财会月刊,2020,41(4):117-123.[29] MEMILI E,FANG H C,WELSH D H B.Value creation and value appropriation in innovation process in publicly-traded family firms[J].Management Decision,2015,53(9):1921-1952.[30] 严若森,杜帅.代际传承对家族企业创新投入的影响——社会情感财富理论视角[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(8):84-91.[31] 杨学儒,窦军生,梁强,罗进辉,朱沆.新时期中国民营(家族)企业的传承与创新创业问题[J].南方经济,2017,35(8):1-7.[32] 张丹,郝蕊.连锁董事网络能够促进企业技术创新绩效吗——基于研发投入的中介效应研究[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(12):183-191.[33] ROSENBUSCH N ,BRINCKMANN J ,BAUSCH A.Is innovation always beneficial? a meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2011,26(4):457.[34] 郭韬,王广益,吴叶,等.企业家背景特征对科技型创业企业绩效的影响——一个有中介的调节模型[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(14):65-72.[35] 张妮,李晓彤.家族涉入与上市公司创新行为关系研究——来自我国家族上市公司的经验数据[J].山东社会科学,2017,31(5):178-183.[36] 李想,徐艳梅.引进购买外部技术对专利产出与新产品销售收入影响的异质性分析——以高技术产业为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40(11):113-124. |
|
|
|