|
|
Research on the Impact of Industrial Policy on Technological Innovation from the Perspective of China′s Capacity Reduction |
Xi Jianming,Wu Hanran |
(School of Economics,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China) |
|
|
Abstract Based on the inter-sector transmission perspective of policy effect, a multi-sector general equilibrium model including the upstream energy sector, the midstream power sector and the downstream production sector is established to depict China's capacity reduction policy implemented in 2015 in the way of exogenous impact on the production function of high energy-consuming industries. Through the calibration model, the core endogenous variables are analyzed in the period of policy impact compared with the balanced growth path changes in the path period. The results show that: first, the policy of capacity reduction at the cost of "short-term pain" can achieve the primary policy goal of boosting the price of excess industrial products; second, under the endogenous setting of technological innovation in the energy sector, the policy of capacity reduction can increase the proportion of green energy in the total energy use and achieve the "green structure effect"; third, the policy of capacity reduction can reduce the green energy to achieve green cost-effectively. Furthermore, price policy is introduced to simulate the policy scenario, and the policy cost of the endogenous technology model and exogenous technology model is compared to achieve the same emission reduction goal. It is found that endogenous technology can acquire the emission reduction goal with a lower tax rate and less welfare loss. The conclusion shows that endogenous technological innovation is the crucial link to improve the transmission of capacity reduction policy and reduce the cost of the policy. It promotes the market boost of downstream surplus Industries and the green transformation of the upstream energy sector. It provides a new perspective of the interaction between industrial policy and technological innovation for supply-side reform research.
|
Received: 27 October 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 韩超,孙晓琳,肖兴志.产业政策实施下的补贴与投资行为:不同类型政策是否存在影响差异[J].经济科学,2016,38(4):30-42.[2] 林毅夫,巫和懋,邢亦青.“潮涌现象”与产能过剩的形成机制[J].经济研究,2010,45(10):4-19.[3] ZHANG Y, ZHANG M, LIU Y, et al. Enterprise investment, local government intervention and coal overcapacity:the case of China[J].Energy Policy, 2017(101),162-169.[4] 范欣,李尚.市场分割诱发了企业产能过剩吗[J].产业经济研究,2020,19(1):15-27.[5] 范林凯,吴万宗,余典范,等.中国工业产能利用率的测度、比较及动态演化——基于企业层面数据的经验研究[J].管理世界,2019,35(8):84-96.[6] YANG Q, HOU X, HAN J, et al. The drivers of coal overcapacity in China: an empirical study based on the quantitative decomposition[J]. Resources,Conservation and Recycling, 2019,141:123-132.[7] WANG D, WANG Y, SONG X, et al. Coal overcapacity in China: multiscale analysis and prediction[J]. Energy Economics, 2018(70): 244-257.[8] WANG D, WAN K, SONG X, et al. Provincial allocation of coal de-capacity targets in China in terms of cost, efficiency, and fairness[J]. Energy Economics,2019(78):109-128.[9] LI W, LU C, DING Y, et al. The impacts of policy mix for resolving overcapacity in heavy chemical industry and operating national carbon emission trading market in China[J]. Applied Energy, 2017(204):509-524.[10] 陆瑶,常江.去产能背景下矿区转型绿色产业体系构建——以申家庄煤矿“光伏+”产业为例[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(9):121-126.[11] 李志俊,原鹏飞.去产能战略的影响评价及建议——基于动态CGE模型的研究[J].中国软科学,2018,33(1):10-18.[12] 陈丽姗,傅元海.融资约束条件下技术创新影响企业高质量发展的动态特征[J].中国软科学,2019,34(12):108-128.[13] 沈煜,丁守海.去产能会引起较大的失业风险吗[J].上海经济研究,2016,33(11):12-19.[14] 王桂军.“抑制型”产业政策促进企业创新了吗——基于中国去产能视角的经验研究[J].南方经济,2019,37(11):1-15.[15] GOULDER, LAWRENCE H, SCHNEIDER, et al. Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2, abatement policies[J]. Resource & Energy Economics,1999(21)(3-4):211-253.[16] POPP D . Entice: endogenous technological change in the DICE model of global warming[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2004, 48(1): 742-768.[17] GERLAGH R.A climate-change policy induced shift from innovations in carbon-energy production to carbon-energy savings[J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2): 425-448.[18] FRIED, STEPHIE.Climate policy and innovation: a quantitative macroeconomic analysis[J]. American Economic Journal Macroeconomics, 2018, 10(1):90-118.[19] ACEMOGLU D, AGHION P, HEMOUS B D. The environment and directed technical change[J]. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(1):131-166.[20] 许松涛,陈霞,YUAN DE-LI.环境规制、政治关联与研发创新资源配置[J].产业经济评论,2018,6(1):24-39.[21] 宋丽颖,钟飞.税收优惠政策激励战略性新兴产业发展的效应评价[J].税务研究,2019,35(8):12-19.[22] 王桂军.“抑制型”产业政策促进企业创新了吗——基于中国去产能视角的经验研究[J].南方经济,2019,37(11):1-15. |
|
|
|