|
|
|
| The Influence of Collaborative Innovation Alliance Dual Stickiness on Innovation Performance with Knowledge Flow |
| Sun Jinhua,Xia Yiping,Hu Jian |
| （School of Management,Chongqing University of Technology,Chongqing 400054,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the collaborative innovation network and knowledge management theory,this paper deeply analyzes the effect of alliance dual stickiness on innovation performance from the perspective of knowledge flows,and establishes the model of alliance dual stickiness knowledge flow innovation performance. The knowledge hidden and knowledge absorption ability are introduced in this model as adjustment variables. Through making hierarchical regression analysis on 166 sample data,the results show that the innovation performance are positively affected by hard technology stickiness and soft technology stickiness,the knowledge diffusion and knowledge spillover has partial intermediary role between alliance stickiness and innovation performance,the regulating roles of knowledge hidden and knowledge absorptive capacity are partly realized by the mediating effect of knowledge flow. Knowledge hiding directly or indirectly regulates the relationship between the dual alliance stickiness and innovation performance. Knowledge absorption ability has an inverted U-shaped regulating effect between knowledge diffusion and innovation performance. Based on this conclusion,it is proposed that alliance enterprises should correctly understand the influence of different alliance stickiness on innovation performance,and emphasize the informal contracts construction based on knowledge rationalization hidden. In the later stage of alliance cooperation,new network nodes are appropriately added and knowledge acquisition channels are broadened. The stable partnership is formed by orderly knowledge flow,so as to drive the improvement of innovation performance.
|
|
Received: 23 September 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] COHEN W M,LEVINTHAL D A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990，35(1): 128-152.[2] 李玲. 技术创新网络中企业间依赖、企业开放度对合作绩效的影响[J]. 南开管理评论,2011,14(4): 16-24.[3] 陈劲,阳银娟. 协同创新的驱动机理[J]. 技术经济,2012,31(8): 6-11+25.[4] MOWERY D C,OXLEY J E,SILVERMAN B S. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2015,17(S2): 77-91.[5] 芮正云,罗瑾琏. 捆绑还是协同:创新联盟粘性对企业间合作绩效的影响——表达型与工具型关系契约的作用差异视角[J]. 系统管理学报,2019,28(1): 1-9.[6] 薛伟贤,孙姝羽. 组织信息化环境下知识流动对组织创造力的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(17): 128-135.[7] 辛德强,党兴华,魏龙. 双元导向创新独占机制、知识流动与联盟绩效[J]. 科学学研究,2017,35(6): 931-939.[8] CONNELLY C,ZWEIG D. How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations[J]. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology,2015,24(3): 479-489.[9] 王思梦,邵云飞,李成刚,等. 基于SEM的产业联盟政策治理对创新能力的影响[J]. 系统工程,2017,35(11): 85-98.[10] ZAHRAS A,GEORGE G. Absorptive capacity: a review,reconceptualization and extension[J]. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2): 185-203.[11] 刘岩,蔡虹,向希尧. 企业技术知识基础多元度对创新绩效的影响——基于中国电子信息企业的实证分析[J]. 科研管理,2015,36(5): 1-9.[12] 孙金花,杨陈. 新视角下IT能力与协同创新绩效作用机理研究[J]. 华东经济管理,2014,28(12): 104-108.[13] 魏奇锋,顾新. 基于知识流动的产学研协同创新过程研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2013,30(15): 133-137.[14] 刘铮. “硬技术”与“软技术”: 论米歇尔·福柯的技术哲学[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2016,32(5): 28-33.[15] ITURRIOZ C,ARAGON C,NARVAIZA L. How to foster shared innovation within a SMEs' network: social capital and the role of intermediaries[J]. European Management Journal,2015,33(2): 104-115.[16] ZHENG Y,YANG H. Does familiarity foster innovation? the impact of alliance partner repeatedness on breakthrough innovations[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2015,52(2): 213-230.[17] BRESCHI S,LISSONI F,MALERBA F. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification[J]. Research Policy,2003,32(1): 69-87.[18] SHIN J,JALAJAS D. Technological relatedness,boundary-spanning combination of knowledge and the impact of innovation: evidence of an inverted-U relationship[J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research,2010,21(2): 87-96.[19] 张运生,田继双. 高科技企业创新生态系统合作伙伴选择研究[J]. 科技与经济,2011,24(5): 21-26.[20] 曹兴,龙凤珍. 技术联盟伙伴选择因素与联盟绩效的关系研究[J].软科学,2013(6)：53-58.[21] 刘宇,邵云飞,康健.知识共享视角下联盟组合构型对企业创新绩效的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(21): 134-140.[22] GULATI R,SINGH H. The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1998,43(4):781-814.[23] 贾军,张卓,张伟.互补资产协同对企业绩效影响研究——技术关联的调节作用[J]. 科研管理,2013,34(10): 84-93.[24] 陈伟,杨早立,张永超. 网络结构与企业核心能力关系实证研究: 基于知识共享与知识整合中介效应视角[J]. 管理评论,2014,26(6): 74-82.[25] 连远强. 国外创新网络研究述评与区域共生创新战略[J]. 人文地理,2016,31(1): 26-32.[26] ZIMMERMANN A,RAVISHANKAR M N. Knowledge transfer in IT offshoring relationships: the roles of social capital,efficacy and outcome expectations[J]. Information Systems Journal,2014,24(2):167-202.[27] 刘海鑫,刘人境,李圭泉. 社会资本、技术有效性与知识贡献的关系研究——基于企业虚拟社区的实证研究[J]. 管理评论,2014,26(12): 10-19.[28] 李莉,党兴华,张首魁. 基于知识位势的技术创新合作中的知识扩散研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2007,22(4): 107-112.[29] 孙永波,丁沂昕. 集群效应下知识溢出、创新能力及创新绩效关系研究[J]. 北京行政学院学报,2018，20(1): 88-96.[30] GRILLITSCH M,NILSSON M. Firm performance in the periphery: on the relation between firm-internal knowledge and local knowledge spillovers[J]. Regional Studies,2016（6）: 1-13.[31] ASHEIM B T,BOSCHMA R,COOKE P. Constructing regional advantage[J]. Regional Studies,2011,45(7): 893-904.[32] CONNELLY C E,ZWEIG D,WEBSTER J W,et al. Knowledge hiding in organizations[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2012,33(1): 64-88.[33] 陈志军,缪沁男. 外部创新源对创新绩效的影响研究:吸收能力的调节作用[J]. 经济管理,2014,36(3): 135-144.[34] LAVIE D.Alliance portfolios and firm performance: a study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(12): 1187-1212.[35] INKPEN A C,TSANG E W K. Social capital,networks,and knowledge transfer[J]. Academy of Management Review,2005,30(1): 146-165.[36] UZZI B,GILLESPIE J J. Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: embeddedness and the firm's debt performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(7): 595-618.[37] 陈劲,陈钰芬. 企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(3): 86-91. |
|
|
|
