|
|
High-tech Enterprise Identification and Enterprise Innovation Efficiency: Promote or Inhibit |
Dou Qianbin,Sun Meilu,Wang Feiyao,Huang Yejing |
(World Economic Institute,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,Shanghai 200020,China) |
|
|
Abstract As a specific industrial policy in China,policy "high-tech enterprises identification" present significant impact on R&D activities and innovation strategies of enterprises.On the basis of distinguishing the innovation efficiency of technology R&D stage and technology transformation stage,this paper uses 14 156 micro sample data of Chinese listed companies in 2008-2017,by adopting three-stage DEA model to measure the innovation efficiency of sample enterprises.Moreover,paper studies the impact of high-tech enterprise identification policies on the innovation efficiency of enterprises in the two stages through counterfactual estimation and medium effect model.The results show that the policy has positive impact in promoting innovation efficiency of Chinese listed companies in the stage of technology R&D.But the policy has a significant inhibitory effect on the innovation efficiency in the stage of technology transformation.Distinguish the main body of enterprises,the policy has a more significant impact on the state-owned enterprises and the enterprises that have implemented the equity incentive and have not obtained the venture capital.The empirical analysis of its influence mechanism shows that the policy affects the innovation efficiency of enterprises in the stage of technological R&D by two ways: easing the financing constraints of enterprises and improving the long-term liabilities.However,the policy also causes R&D investment of enterprises to "squeeze out" operating costs,advertising expenses and other expenses of enterprises,thus inhibiting the innovation efficiency of enterprises in the stage of technological transformation.
|
Received: 16 May 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 雷根强,郭玥.高新技术企业被认定后企业创新能力提升了吗——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].财政研究,2018,427(9):32-47.[2] 王刚刚,谢富纪,贾友.R&D补贴政策激励机制的重新审视——基于外部融资激励机制的考察[J].中国工业经济,2017,347(2):60-78.[3] 戴小勇,成力为.财政补贴政策对企业研发投入的门槛效应[J].科研管理,2014,35(6):68-76.[4] 冯海红,曲婉,李铭禄.税收优惠政策有利于企业加大研发投入吗[J].科学学研究,2015,33(5):665-673.[5] 张杰,陈志远,杨连星,等.中国创新补贴政策的绩效评估:理论与证据[J].经济研究,2015,50(10):4-17+33.[6] 闫华红,廉英麒,田德录.政府补助与税收优惠哪个更能促进企业创新绩效[J].中国科技论坛,2019(9):40-48.[7] 张信东,贺亚楠,马小美.R&D税收优惠政策对企业创新产出的激励效果分析——基于国家级企业技术中心的研究[J].当代财经,2014(11):35-45.[8] GUO D,GUO Y,JIANG K.Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: evidence from China[J].Research policy,2016,45(6): 1129-1144.[9] BRONZINI R,PISELLI P.The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation[J].Research Policy,2016,45(2): 442-457.[10] 马文聪,叶阳平,李小转,等.政府科技资助对企业研发产出的影响——基于我国大中型工业企业的实证研究[J].管理评论,2019,31(11):94-107.[11] 任跃文.政府补贴有利于企业创新效率提升吗——基于门槛模型的实证检验[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(24):18-26.[12] HONG J,FENG B,WU Y,et al.Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China's high-tech industries[J].Technovation,2016,57(6):4-13.[13] 陈庆江.政府科技投入能否提高企业技术创新效率[J].经济管理,2017,39(2):6-19.[14] HONG J,HONG S,WANG L,et al.Government grants,private R&D funding and innovation efficiency in transition economy[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2015,27(9): 1068-1096.[15] 温忠麟.张雷,侯杰泰,等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620.[16] 孟维站,李春艳,石晓冬.中国高技术产业创新效率分阶段分析——基于三阶段DEA模型[J].宏观经济研究,2019(2):78-91.[17] BANKER R D,CHARNES A,COOPER W W.Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J].Management Science,1984,30(9):1078-1092.[18] 李洪伟,任娜,陶敏,等.基于三阶段DEA的我国高新技术产业投入产出效率分析[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(S1):126-131.[19] 何玉润,林慧婷,王茂林.产品市场竞争、高管激励与企业创新——基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J].财贸经济,2015(2):125-135.[20] 赵登峰,唐杰,陈勇.人力资本、内部股权激励与创新企业长期产出的增长路径[J].南开经济研究,2015(2):3-23.[21] 陈思,何文龙,张然.风险投资与企业创新:影响和潜在机制[J].管理世界,2017(1):158-169.[22] 于永达,陆文香.风险投资和科技企业创新效率:助力还是阻力[J].上海经济研究,2017(8):47-60. |
|
|
|