|
|
|
| Structure Holes and Brokerage Roles of Collaborative Innovation Network in Harbin-Changchun Urban Agglomeration:a Two-dimensional Measurement of Industry-university-research Network and Inter-city Relationship Network based on Patent Data |
| Li Xin1,Li Baizhou2 |
| (1.School of Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China; 2.School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The construction of urban agglomeration and its collaborative innovation network is conducive to the modernization of regional governance system and governance capacity.The purpose of this study is to analyze the strength of collaborative innovation network, define the roles of the dominant position holders, clarify the specific connection form of innovation subjects and inter-city relations in Harbin-Changchun urban agglomeration.The social network analysis method is used to measure the structural holes and brokerage roles based on patent data.The results reveal that the network structure of industry-university-research cooperation is loose.Universities occupy the dominant position in the structural holes and act as the actual brokerage roles of inter-city relations, such as JLU and HIT.Due to the lack of leading innovative enterprises with core resources, the technological marketization ability of enterprises in urban agglomeration cannot meet the technological transformation needs of universities and research institutes.Furthermore, the incentive for universities and research institutes to seek external collaborative innovation cooperation has been formed.The inner inter-city relationship of urban agglomeration is simple, and the peripheral cities are totally or partially subject to Harbin or Changchun.There are many external partners outside the urban agglomeration, and in many cases, the inter-city relationship within and outside the urban agglomeration is established through the gatekeeper or representative played by Harbin or Changchun.
|
|
Received: 17 April 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cite this article: |
|
Li Xin,Li Baizhou. Structure Holes and Brokerage Roles of Collaborative Innovation Network in Harbin-Changchun Urban Agglomeration:a Two-dimensional Measurement of Industry-university-research Network and Inter-city Relationship Network based on Patent Data[J]. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2020, 37(14): 66-75.
|
|
|
|
| URL: |
| http://www.kjjb.org/EN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2020020753 OR http://www.kjjb.org/EN/Y2020/V37/I14/66 |
| [1] 顾朝林.城市群研究进展与展望[J].地理研究,2011,30(5):771-784.[2] 方创琳.中国城市群研究取得的重要进展与未来发展方向[J].地理学报,2014,69(8):1130-1144.[3] YAKIMOV M.Methods for spatial analysis of city structure distribution to estimate city agglomeration boundaries[J].Transportation Research Procedia, 2018（36）:794-800.[4] SIDDIQUI A, MAITHANI S.Urban growth dynamics of an Indian metropolitan using CA Markov and Logistic Regression[J].The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2018,21(3):229-236.[5] 景楠,颜波.东北区域物流与经济的空间自相关和空间聚类分析[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2015，273(1):134-140.[6] TOKUNOVA G.Assessment of the transport infrastructure influence on urban agglomerations development[J].Transportation Research Procedia, 2018（36）:754-758.[7] 周正祥,毕继芳.长江中游城市群综合交通运输体系优化研究[J].中国软科学,2019，344(8):66-76.[8] 翟士运,古朴,安毅.城市群与企业创新行为:联动效应及路径分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40(7):31-42.[9] TAO F, ZHANG H Q, XIA X H.Decomposed sources of green productivity growth for three major urban agglomerations in China[J].Energy Procedia, 2016（104）:481-486.[10] LEE D S.The changing structures of co-invention networks in american urban areas[J].Procedia Computer Science, 2016（96）:1075-1085.[11] PAGANO G, LOSCO S.EU cohesion-policies and metropolitan areas[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016,233:422-428.[12] 杨明海,张红霞,孙亚男.七大城市群创新能力的区域差距及其分布动态演进[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2017,34(3):21-39.[13] 徐宜青,曾刚,王秋玉.长三角城市群协同创新网络格局发展演变及优化策略[J].经济地理,2018,38(11):133-140.[14] 谢伟伟,邓宏兵,苏攀达.长江中游城市群知识创新合作网络研究——高水平科研合著论文实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(16):44-50.[15] 毛琦梁,王菲.地区比较优势演化的空间关联:知识扩散的作用与证据[J].中国工业经济,2018,368(11):136-154.[16] FAERBER L A, BALTA-OZKAN N, CONNOR P M.Innovative network pricing to support the transition to a smart grid in a low-carbon economy[J].Energy Policy, 2018（116）:210-219.[17] 方炜,王莉丽.协同创新网络演化模型及仿真研究——基于类DNA翻译过程[J].科学学研究,2018,36(7):1294-1304.[18] 殷德生,吴虹仪,金桩.创新网络、知识溢出与高质量一体化发展——来自长江三角洲城市群的证据[J].上海经济研究,2019，374(11):30-45.[19] RODRIGUEZ M A, PEPE A.On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of a coauthorship network[J].Journal of Informetrics, 2008,2(3):195-201.[20] 危怀安,王婉娟.生态关系对国家重点实验室协同创新系统稳定性影响研究——以天津大学—英飞凌汽车电子联合实验室为例[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(2):1-7.[21] 葛秋萍,汪明月.基于不对称Nash谈判修正的产学研协同创新战略联盟收益分配研究[J].管理工程学报,2018,32(1):79-83.[22] 斯科特,卡林顿.社会网络分析手册（下卷）[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2018.[23] 刘军.整体网络分析:UCINET软件实用指南[M].上海:格致出版社, 2019.[24] BURT R S.Structural holes and good ideas[J].American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 110(2):349-399.[25] GOULD R V, FERNANDEZ R M.Structures of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks[J].Sociological Methodology, 1989（19）:89-126.[26] BOARI C, MORALES F X, CHFER L.Direct and interactive effects of brokerage roles on innovation in clustered firms[J].Growth and Change, 2017,48(3):336-358.[27] 周洪文,宋丽萍.区域创新系统能力动态变迁的测度与评价[J].管理学报,2015,12(9):1343-1350.[28] 唐恒,高粱洲,刘桂锋.京津冀产学研专利合作网络时空演化研究[J].情报杂志,2017,36(10):130-136. |
|
|
|
