|
|
Legal Interpretation and Realization Route of Confering Ownership of Scientific and Technological Achievements of Scientific Researchers |
LiZhenggang |
(Civil and Commercial Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China) |
|
|
Abstract It is a national policy issue to give scientific researchers the ownership of scientific and technological achievements by designing the rules of ownership to solve the difficulties of transformation of scientific and technological achievements.However, contract law, the law of scientific and technological progress, the law of transformation of scientific and technological achievements and other relevant provisions of the law restrict the formation of policy pilot, weakening the implementation of the policy.This paper clarifies the definition and types of scientific and technological achievements from legal perspective, defines the nature and scope of scientific research personnel, explores the policy objectives of the ownership reform of scientific and technological achievements, and analyses the legal obstacles faced by the implementation of the policies.It also puts forward that the relevant laws should be revised on the principle of autonomy of will, Legislative Interpretation should be made with the purpose of giving priority to the Scientist's interests.And the ownership of scientific and technological achievements is stipulated through prior agreements between companies and scientific researchers.The ownership of job-related scientific and technological achievements may be conferred to researchers according to laws, thus it can eliminate the conflicts between legal provisions and policy implementation and ensure the legal legitimacy of policy implementation.
|
Received: 24 October 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郑文范,李佳.科技统计学[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社,1999:276.[2] 郭美云.科技成果的定义分类及其评价[J].华东石油学院学报(社会科学版),1988(1):82-83.[3] 荆明新.科技成果的概念与分类[J].河南科技,1989(9):7-8.[4] 唐五湘,黄伟.科技成果转化的理论与实践[M].北京:方志出版社,2006:4.[5] 石善冲.科技成果转化评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2003(6):31-33.[6] 李玉香.科技成果转化法律问题研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2015:2.[7] 马忠法.创新型国家建设背景下的科技成果转化法律制度研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2013:15.[8] 李政刚.职务科技成果权属改革的法律障碍及其消解[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2019(2):69.[9] 冷必元,王瑞玲.单位对科技成果法定范围、权属主体的限制解释[J].科技进步与对策,2019(13):120.[10] 刘俊士.专利创造性分析原理[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2012:190.[11] 管镠旎.浅析农业科研单位技术类科研辅助人员短缺现状与建议[J].农业科技管理,2018(2):83-85.[12] 刘凤,张明瑶,康凯宁,等.高校职务科技成果混合所有制分析——基于产权理论视角[J].中国高校科技,2017(9):16-20.[13] 林满,官全龙.高校科技成果转化中产权的配置:含义与应用——基于不完全契约理论视角[J].科技管理研究,2010(11):234.[14] 张文斐.职务科技成果混合所有制的经济分析[J].软科学,2019(5);54.[15] 丁明磊.地方探索职务科技成果权属混合所有制改革的思考与建议[J].科学管理研究,2018(1):18.[16] 慎理.试论专利权共有制度[J].科技与法律,2009(2):94.[17] 徐洁.科技成果转化的制度障碍与消除——以加快建设创新型国家为旨要[J].现代法学,2018(2):119-131.[18] 朱一飞.高校科技成果转化法律制度的检视与重构[J].法学,2016(4):91-92.[19] 李石勇.财政资助科技成果政府介入权法律制度探究[J].政法论丛,2018(4):82-92.[20] 陶鑫良.职务发明性质之约定和职务发明报酬及奖励——我国专利法第四次修订中有关职务发明若干问题的讨论[J].知识产权,2016(3):3-13.[21] 徐晓阳,李晓轩.成果权属事关科技成果的产出和转化——我国财政资助科技成果权属政策的演进与局限[J].中国科学院院刊,2014(5):558-563.[22] 万志前,朱照照.论职务科技成果转化利益分配的约定优先原则[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(3):125.[23] 吴寿仁.科技成果转化若干热点问题解析(二十五)——新修订的《事业单位国有资产管理暂行办法》导读[J].科技中国,2019(6):52-57. |
|
|
|