|
|
|
| Research on the Direction of China's Industrial Transformation and Upgrading under High Quality Development |
| Zhang Yongheng1,Wang Jiating2 |
| (1. Taihang Development Research Institute, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000,China;2.Research Center of China Urban and Regional Economies, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The continuous transformation and upgrading of the industry is the key to realize the high-quality economic development. We can conclude its specific path and evolution mechanism from the two dimensions of quantity and quality. This paper uses the time-series data of China during the period of 1985-2017 and the data of The United States during the period of 1960-2017, to simulate and analyzes the dynamic relationship among broad and narrow sense of industrial structure with economic growth. The results show there are some differences between China and American. Accordingly, we can get the specific direction of China's industrial transformation and upgrading under high-quality development, such as expanding and refining the dimension of industrial transformation and upgrading;pay attention to the ratio between different industries, especially the ratio between producer services and manufacturing industries;attaching importance to and establishing the fundamental position of manufacturing industry in high quality development;enhance the export-oriented degree of our economy.
|
|
Received: 25 June 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] BAUMOL W J. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis[J]. American Economic Review, 1967, 57(3):415-426.[2]WOLFL A. Productivity growth in service industries[J]. Oecd Working Papers, 2005, 9(5):25-40.[3]DRAKEBROCKMAN J. The importance of measuring the delivery of services via commercial presence of offshore foreign affiliates: some case studies from australian business experience[R]. Adbi Working Papers, 2011.[4]TRIPLETT J E,BOSWORTH B.Productivity measurement issues in services industries: Baumol's disease has been cured[J]. Economic Policy Review, 2003(9):23-33.[5]庞瑞芝, 邓忠奇. 服务业生产率真的低吗[J]. 经济研究, 2014(12):86-99.[6]渠慎宁, 吕铁. 产业结构升级意味着服务业更重要吗——论工业与服务业互动发展对中国经济增长的影响[J]. 财贸经济, 2016, 37(3):138-147.[7]SEPP J, VARBLANE U. The decomposition of productivity gap between estonia and korea[Z]. Discourses in Social Economy,2014.[8]BEHUN M, GAVUROVA B, TKACOVA A. The impact of the manufacturing industry on the European Union countries [J]. Journal of Competitiveness, 2018,10(1): 23-39.[9]TIMMER M P, SZIRMAI A. Productivity growth in asian manufacturing: the structural bonus hypothesis examined[J]. Structural Change & Economic Dynamics, 2000, 11(4):371-392.[10] 张军, 陈诗一, Gary,等. 结构改革与中国工业增长[J]. 经济研究, 2009(7):4-20.[11]徐佳宾, 刘勇凤. 中国工业增长的动力分析:规模还是结构[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2017, 36(6):33-44.[12]FRANCOIS J, WOERZ J. Producer services, manufacturing linkages, and trade[J]. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2008, 8(3-4): 199-229.[13]COREYNEN W,MATTHYSSENS P,BOCKHAVEN W V.Boosting servitization through digitization: pathways and dynamic resource configurations for manufacturers[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2017, 60:42-53.[14]格鲁伯，沃克.服务业的增长：原因和影响[M].陈彪如，译.上海：上海三联书店，1993.[15]顾乃华, 毕斗斗, 任旺兵. 生产性服务业与制造业互动发展:文献综述[J]. 经济学家, 2006(6):35-41.[16]綦良群,张庆楠.我国装备制造业与生产性服务业网式融合影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(13):64-71.[17]西奥多·W·舒尔茨. 报酬递增的源泉[M].李海明，赵波，译.北京：中国人民大学出版社，2016. [18]张其仔, 李蕾. 制造业转型升级与地区经济增长[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2017, 38(2):97-111.[19]唐晓华, 张欣珏, 李阳. 中国制造业与生产性服务业动态协调发展实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2018(3):70-93. |
|
|
|
