|
|
|
| Information Development Level, Resource Dependence and Green Total Factor Productivity |
| Zheng Tingting1,Fu Wei2,Chen Jing3 |
| (1.School of Economics and Management,North China University of Technology,Beijing 100144, China;2.School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China;3. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As an important promoter of high-quality economic development, informatization is of great significance to the resource region to get out of the resource curse, but it has been ignored by the academic circles. This paper creatively introduces the level of informatization development into the discussion of resource curse. The DEA-Malmqusit index method is used to measure the green total factor productivity (GTFP) of 285 prefecture-level cities and above in China from 2003 to 2017, and analyzes the development of informatization. The level plays a role in resource dependence and GTFP relationships. The results show that: (1) The threshold effect of information development level leads to the dependence of resource dependence and GTFP on inverted U-shaped curve. When the level of informatization development is lower than the threshold, regardless of the degree of resource dependence, its relationship with GTFP is always on the right side of the inverted U-shaped curve, that is, in the part of the resource curse, and when the level of informatization is higher than At the threshold, regardless of the degree of resource dependence, its relationship with GTFP is on the left side of the inverted U-shaped curve, that is, in the part of resource blessing;(2) The level of information development promotes resource dependence and GTFP inverted U-shaped curve The most influential part of the inflection point, the level of informatization development can delay the arrival of the resource curse.
|
|
Received: 29 May 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] ZHANG L, LONG R, CHEN H, et al. Performance changes analysis of industrial enterprises under energy constraints[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018 (136):248-256.[2]AUTY R M. Sustaining development in mineral economies: the resource curse thesis [J]. World Development, 1993(47):62-74.[3]邵帅,范美婷,杨莉莉.资源产业依赖如何影响经济发展效率?——有条件资源诅咒假说的检验及解释[J].管理世界,2013(2):32-63.[4]何雄浪,姜泽林.自然资源禀赋与经济增长:资源诅咒还是资源福音?——基于劳动力结构的一个理论与实证分析框架[J].财经研究,2016,42(12):27-38.[5]胡援成,肖德勇.经济发展门槛与自然资源诅咒——基于我国省际层面的面板数据实证研究[J].管理世界,2007(4):15-23+171.[6]万建香,汪寿阳.社会资本与技术创新能否打破“资源诅咒”?——基于面板门槛效应的研究[J].经济研究,2016,51(12):76-89.[7]徐素波,耿晓媛.自然资源依赖对高技术产业研发效率的抑制效应研究[J].科技管理研究,2019(8):110-115.[8]李波,梁双陆.信息通信技术、信息化密度与地区产业增长——基于中国工业数据的经验研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2017,39(9):58-71.[9]张敏,马泽昊.信息化、产业结构与区域经济增长——基于中国省际面板数据的经验分析[J].财政研究,2013(8):39-42.[10] SACHS J D, WARNER A M. The curse of natural resources [J]. European Economic Review, 2001, 45(4):827-838.[11]COXHEAD I. A new resource curse? impacts of China's boom on comparative advantage and resource dependence in Southeast Asia [J]. World Development, 2007, 35(7):1099-1119.[12]刘华军,李超,彭莹,等.中国绿色全要素生产率增长的空间不平衡及其成因解析[J].财经理论与实践,2018,39(5):116-121.[13]吴传清,宋子逸.长江经济带农业绿色全要素生产率测度及影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(17):35-41.[14]EUGENIO B， ENRIQUE T. Sustainable development in a natural resource rich economy: the case of Chile in 1985-2004[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2010(12):647-667.[15]王云霞,韩彪.技术进步偏向、要素禀赋与物流业绿色全要素生产率[J].北京工商大学学报：社会科学版,2018,33(2):51-61.[16]钟成林,胡雪萍.自然资源禀赋对区域生态效率的影响研究[J].大连理工大学学报：社会科学版,2016,37(3):19-26.[17]黄建欢,杨晓光,成刚,等.生态效率视角下的资源诅咒:资源开发型和资源利用型区域的对比[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(1):34-42.[18]李江龙,徐斌.“诅咒”还是“福音”:资源丰裕程度如何影响中国绿色经济增长[J].经济研究,2018,53(9):151-167.[19]徐杰芳. 煤炭资源型城市绿色发展路径研究[D].合肥：安徽大学,2018.[20]杜克锐,张宁.资源丰裕度与中国城市生态效率:基于条件SBM模型的实证分析[J].西安交通大学学报：社会科学版,2019,39(1):65-72.[21]孙早,刘李华.信息化提高了经济的全要素生产率吗——来自中国1979—2014年分行业面板数据的证据[J].经济理论与经济管理,2018(5):5-18.[22]董会忠,刘帅,刘明睿,等.创新质量对绿色全要素生产率影响的异质性研究——环境规制的动态门槛效应[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(6):43-50.[23]张宁,郭昕,闫雅莉.海洋经济、绿色全要素生产率与信息化水平——基于11个沿海省市的实证分析[J].生产力研究,2018(9):87-92+100+161.[24]ANDROUTSOS A.Access link bandwidth externalities and endogenous internet growth: a long-run economic approach [J]. International Journal of Network Management, 2011, 21(1):21-44.[25]惠树鹏,王森.基于多重约束的两化融合对工业绿色全要素生产率的影响研究[J].软科学,2018,32(12):35-39.[26]陈庆江,杨蕙馨,焦勇.信息化和工业化融合对能源强度的影响——基于2000-2012年省际面板数据的经验分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(1):55-63.[27]李清辉,赵明丽.以发展信息产业为重点加快资源型城市转型[J].经济研究导刊,2010(19):138-140.[28]陈庆修.以信息化引领和带动绿色化[N].学习时报,2018-09-12.[29]韩先锋,惠宁,宋文飞. 信息化能提高中国工业部门技术创新效率吗[J]. 中国工业经济,2014 (12):70-82.[30]卢敏. 中国省域工业行业信息化建设及其对经济增长的贡献研究[D].重庆：中共重庆市委党校,2013.[31]HANSEN B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels estimation, testing and inference [J]. Journal of Econometrics，1999，93(2):345-368.[32]PAPYRAKIS E, GERLAGH R. The resource curse hypothesis and its transmission channels[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2004, 32(1):1-193.[33]LIU G, BING W, NING Z. A coin has two sides: which one is driving China's green TFP growth[J]. Economic Systems, 2016, 40(3):481-498.[34]张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J].经济研究,2004(10):35-44.[35]YOUNG A. Gold into base metals: productivity growth in the people's republic of china during the reform period[J]. Nber Working Papers, 2000, 111(6):1220-1261.[36]林伯强.结构变化、效率改进与能源需求预测——以中国电力行业为例[J].经济研究,2003(5):57-65+93.[37]茶洪旺,郑婷婷,袁航.资源诅咒与产业结构的关系研究——基于PVAR模型的分析[J].软科学,2018,32(7):97-101.[38]李逢春.对外直接投资的母国产业升级效应——来自中国省际面板的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题,2012(6):124-134.[39]HERRENDORF B, SCHOELLMAN T. Why is measured productivity so low in agriculture[J]. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2015, 18(4):1003-1022.[40]吴新中,邓明亮.技术创新、空间溢出与长江经济带工业绿色全要素生产率[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(17):50-58. |
|
|
|
