|
|
|
| Industrial Attributes, Regional Heterogeneity and National Value Chain Division in China |
| Guo Lijuan1,Wu Zhenming2 |
| （1. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China；2. Institute of Regional and Urban Development, Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences, Chengdu 610072, China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the inter-regional input-output table and the upstreamness model, this paper constructs the national value chain (NVC) division status, embedding position and value-added capability index to examine the NVC's spatial form between 1997 and 2007. And then a panel data model is applied to analyze the industrial and regional heterogeneity of national value chains. Research shows that China has not yet formed a strict "east-central-west" value chain gradient spatial pattern. Industrial attributes determine the embedding position and division status; the higher the proportion of the industry state-owned property, the more the value-adding is created. The industry K/L enhances the embedding position but worsens the value chain division status, the industry scale has no significant impact on the NVC division status. Regional FDI leads to the low-embedding position and weakens value-adding capability. Regional innovation investment increases direct value-adding and regional marketization level improves embedding position, but both of them have no enormous impact on value chain upgrading. Optimizing the market environment and institutional costs and designing differentiated regional industrial upgrading paths is the key to national value chains construction.
|
|
Received: 29 May 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] GEREFFI G. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain[J].Journal of International Economics,1999,48(1):37-70.[2] HUMPHREY J,SCHIMITZ H.How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?[J].Regional Studies, 2002,36(9):1017-1027.[3] KAPLINSKY R.Globalisation and unequalisation:what can be learned from value chain analysis[J]. The Journal of Development Studies,2000,37(2):117-146.[4] BAZAN L, NAVAS-ALEMAN L. Upgrading in global and national value Chains:recent challenges and opportunities for the Sinos Valley footwear cluster, Brazil[J].Aleman，2003(10):1-28.[5] CHENG JMS, BLANKSON C, WU PC S, et al. A stage model of international brand development:the perspectives of manufacturers from two newly industrialized economies——South Korea and Taiwan[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2005,34(5):504-514.[6] HUMPHREY H, SCHMITZ H. Chain governance and upgrading: takingstock [A]// SCHIMITZ H. Local enterprises in the global economy: issues of governance and upgrading.Cheltenham: Elgar,2004.[7] 刘志彪.重构国家价值链:转变中国制造业发展方式的思考[J].世界经济与政治论坛，2011(7):1-14.[8] 刘志彪,张少军.中国地区差距及其纠偏:全球价值链和国内价值链的视角[J].学术月刊，2008(5)：49-55. [9] 刘友金,胡黎明.产品内分工、价值链重组与产业转移——兼论产业转移过程中的大国战略[J].中国软科学，2011(3)：149-159. [10] 唐根年,许紫岳,张杰.产业转移、空间效率改进与中国异质性大国区间“雁阵模式”[J].经济研究，2015（7）：97-104.[11] ANTRAS P, CHOR D, FALLY T, et al. Measuring the upstreamness of production and trade flows[J].American Economics Review，2012,102(3):412-416.[12] FALLY T. On the fragment of production in the US[Z]. University of Colorado-Boulde，2011(7):1-44.[13] 王岚,李宏艳.中国制造业融入全球价值链路径研究[J].中国工业经济，2015(2)：76-88.[14] 黎峰.增加值视角下的中国国家价值链分工[J].中国工业经济，2016(3)：52-67.[15] 潘文卿.中国区域的国内价值链:关联特征与变化趋势[J].中国工业经济,2017(11):57-61.[16] 周华,等.非等间距产业上游度及贸易上游度测算方法的设计及应用[J].浙江理工大学学报:社会科学版，2016（6）：128-143.[17] 费文博,等.融入国家价值链的中国区域制造业升级路径研究[J].经济体制改革，2017（5）：61-68.[18] 陈晓华,陆直,刘慧.全球价值链“物理”位置研究评述与展望[J].数量经济技术经济研究，2016（5）：419-427.[19] 王玉燕,林汉川,吕臣.全球价值链嵌入的技术进步效应——来自中国工业面板数据的经验研究[J].经济研究，2014(9)：65-77.[20] 李跟强,潘文卿.国内价值链如何嵌入全球价值链：增加值的视角[J].管理世界，2016（7）:10-22. |
|
|
|
