|
|
Identification and Role Analysis of Star Inventors: an Empirical Study on Machine Learning Technology |
Wu Feifei,Li Qian,Huang Lucheng,Li Xin |
(School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124) |
|
|
Abstract Star inventors contribute to enterprises to improve the R&D innovation performance. At present, the research on star inventors lacks analysis of their status and function. Enterprises can not fully understand the information of inventors, which is not conducive to recruiting suitable talents for their R&D activities. This paper proposes to identify the functions and status of the star inventors in the field of machine learning, such as leadership, communication, knowledge or task exclusion. By using dynamic network analysis, we identify the focus inventor, the leading inventor, the potential trans-boundary inventor, the disseminated inventor, the task-exclusive inventor and the knowledge-exclusive inventor and analyze 6 kinds of roles in the machine learning technical field. Our results are threefold: ①some star inventors have multiple roles; ②star inventors with status of leader, focus and knowledge-exclusive have a wider range of effects, higher mobility, a longer duration of interaction with other inventors; ③the isolation of a triple-roles star inventor in the network has a significant impact on the focus inventor.
|
Received: 21 January 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1]NARIN F, BREITZMAN A.Inventive productivity[J]. Research Policy, 1995, 24(4): 507-519.[2]ZUCKER L G, DARBY M R, ARMSTRONG J S. Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology[J].Management Science, 2002, 48(1): 138-153.[3]ERNST H, LEPTIEN C, VITT J. Inventors are not alike: the distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2002, 47(2):184-199.[4]BLOMKVIST K, KAPPEN P, ZANDER I. Superstar inventors-towards a people-centric perspective on the geography of technological renewal in the multinational corporation[J].Research Policy, 2014, 43(4): 669-682.[5]ALMEIDA P, HOHBERGER J, PARADA P. Individual scientific collaborations and firm-level innovation [J].Industrial & Corporate Change, 2012, 20(6): 1571-1599.[6]BEAUDRYAB C. Impacts of collaboration and network indicators on patent quality: the case of Canadian nanotechnology innovation[J].European Management Journal, 2011, 29(5): 362-376.[7]COHEN W M, LEVINTHAL D A. Adsorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning[J].Admi- nistrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.[8]COCKBURN I M, LACETERA N, HENDERSON R. Do firms change capabilities by hiring new people? a study of the adoption of science-based drug discovery[J].Advances in Strategic Management, 2004, 21(1): 133-159.[9]PILKINGTON A, LEE L L, CHAN C K, et al. Defining key inventors: a comparison of fuel cell and nanotechnology industries[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2009, 76(1): 118-127.[10]ROTA M, SCHETTINO F, SPINESI L. Key inventors, teams and firm performance: the italian case [J].Structural Change & Economic Dynamics, 2017(42): 13-25.[11]SINGH J, FLEMING L. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: myth or reality?[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2010,56(1): 41-56.[12]高杰, 丁云龙, 郑作龙. 中国创新研究群体合作网络的形成与演化机理研究——科学共同体视阈下优秀创新群体案例分析[J]. 管理评论, 2018, 30(3):248-263.[13]柯江林, 孙健敏, 石金涛, 等. 企业R&D团队之社会资本与团队效能关系的实证研究——以知识分享与知识整合为中介变量[J]. 管理世界, 2007(3):89-101.[14]孙笑明, 王静雪, 王成军, 等. 研发者专利合作网络中结构洞变化对企业创新能力的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(2): 116-122.[15]GRIGORIOU K, ROTHAERMEL F T. Structural microfoundations of innovation: the role of relational stars.[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(2):586-615.[16]ZWICK T, FROSCH K, HOISL K, et al. The power of individual-level drivers of inventive performance[J].Research Policy, 2017, 46(1): 121-137.[17]LORENZO F D, ALMEIDA P. The role of relative performance in inter-firm mobility of inventors [J].Research Policy, 2017, 46(6): 1162-1174.[18]杨忠,文庭孝. 专利发明人影响力评价模型构建及实证研究——基于文献计量与社会网络分析双重视角[J].情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(9): 69-75.[19]ZHANG G, DUAN H, ZHOU J. Network stability, connectivity and innovation out put[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2017(114): 339-349.[20]MENON C. Stars and comets: an exploration of the patent universe[R].London: LSE, 2009.[21]LI G C, LAI R, D'AMOUR A, et al. Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975-2010)[J].Research Policy, 2014, 43(6): 941-955.[22]CARLEY K M. Dynamic network analysis[M].Washington: The National Academic Press, 2003.[23]Ora: organizational risk analyzer[R]. Pittsburgh: CMU, 2004.[24]AGRAWAL A, MCHALE J, OETTL A. How stars matter: recruiting and peer effects in evolutionary biology[J].Research Policy, 2017, 46(4): 853-867.[25]TSENG C Y, TING P H. Patent analysis for technology development of artificial intelligence: a country-level comparative study[J].Innovation, 2013, 15(4): 463-475. |
[1] |
Wu Feifei,,Li Qian,Mi Lan,,Li Xin,,Huang Lucheng,. Research on the Evolution Characteristics of Interfirms R&D Cooperation Network Based on Internet Information[J]. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2018, 35(15): 89-95. |
|
|
|
|