|
|
The Function Mechanism and Function Features of Businesses Innovation Speed Under the Innovation-Driven Development Context |
Liu Jun1,Zhang Lei1,Chen xue2 |
(1. School of Management, Guizhou University of Finance and Economic, Guiyang 550025, China;2.Guizhou Province Tobacco Companies Bijie Company, Bijie 551700, China) |
|
|
Abstract In the context of innovation-driven, innovation has become a consensus of society, and speed of businesses innovation is also a concern. This paper first analyzes the mechanism of businesses innovation through the mechanism of micro overlay mechanism and macro action mechanism. Then, this paper uses the panel threshold regression model to study the characteristics of businesses innovation speed. Empirical research shows that: the innovation speed of high technology businesses has a positive effect on the innovation results, for the innovation speed. It would not be the sooner the better, the innovation speed and innovation results in the inverted U curve relationship. The innovation speed has threshold effect, the faster the innovation speed is, the greater the elasticity coefficient of innovation results. Innovation speed has threshold effect of innovation results, the greater the innovation results are, the higher the elasticity coefficient of innovation speed.
|
Received: 23 April 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1]孙卫,徐昂,尚磊. 创新速度理论研究评述与展望[J]. 科技进步与对策,2010(4):156-160.[2]张赤东. 企业创新政策体系与使用指南[M]. 北京:知识产权出版社,2017:112-118.[3]URBAN G L, CARTERT S, GASKIN Z M.Market share rewards to pioneering brands: an empirical analysis and strategic implications [J]. Management Science, 1986, 32 (6): 645-659.[4]张赤东. 创新型企业评价理论与实践[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社,2015:66-71.[5]MANISFIELD E. The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and United States: external vs. internal technology[J]. Management Science,1988,34:1157-1169.[6]KESSLER E H,CHAKRABARTI A K. Innovation speed:a conceptual model of context, antecedents and outcomes[J]. Academy of Management Review,1996(21):1143-1491.[7]COHEN M A, ELIASHBERG J. New product development: the performance and time-to-market tradeoff [J]. Management Science, 1996, 42 (2): 173-186.[8]GRIFFIN A. The voice of the customer[J].Marketing Science, 1993, 12(1): 1-27.[9]MURMANN P A. Expected development time reductions in the german mechanical engineering industry[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1994, 11(3): 236-252.[10]KARAGOZOGLU N, BROWN W B. Time-based management of the new product development process[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1993, 10(3): 204-215.[11]ZIRGER B J,HARTLEY J L.The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1996 (43): 143-152.[12]马永远. 新产品开发团队时间压力、自省性与创新绩效[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2015(2):139-146.[13]CHEN J Y, REILLY R R, LYNN G S. New product development speed: too much of a good thing[J]. Journal of product Innovation Management,2012,29(2):288-303. [14]STREICHER G,SCHIBANY A,GRETZMACHER N.Input additionality effects of R&D subsidies in Austria[M].sterr Institution Wirtsch,2004:9-15.[15]GRILICHES Z.Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J]. Bell Journal of Economics,1979(1):92-116.[16]JAFFEA B. Real effects of academic research[J]. The American Economic Review, 1989 (5):957-970.[17]MUNDLAK Y.Empirical productions free of management bias[J]. Journal of Farm Economics,1961(43): 44-56.[18]BLUNDELL R, BOND S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1998,87:115-143.[19]GRILICHES Z.Patent sstatistics as economic indicators: a survey[J]. Journal of economic literature,1990, 28(12):1661-1707.[20]HANSEN B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation,testing and inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999,(93) : 345-368. |
|
|
|