|
|
|
| The Evolution, Trend and Prospect of China's Science and Technology Talents Policy since Reform and Opening Up based on the Analysis of Common Words |
| Li Yanping1,2，Liu Jinlu1，Hong Jiangpeng1，Li Shuwen3 |
| （1.School of Economics and Management，Wuhan University；2.Research Center for China Industry-university-research Institute Collaboration, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072，China; 3. School of economic management，China University of Geosciences（Wuhan），Wuhan 430074，China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract It is significant for guiding future work of scientific and technological talents to review and summarize the development of talent policy in China since the 40 years of reform and opening up. This paper takes talents policy from 1978 to 2017 as the object, combines qualitative methods and quantitative methods, analyzes the status, development process and the trend of these policies by the methods of policy bibliometrics and coword analysis. In this paper, from horizontal dimension and vertical time dimension we find the development of scientific and technological personnel policy can be divided into four stages, recovery, indepth reform, strategic orientation and innovation development. Moreover, this paper introduces the various characteristics and keywords of scientific and technological personnel policy in different stages, sums up the trend in the aspect of policy goal, policy object and policy tools. The future of talent policy is prospected at the end of the paper.
|
|
Received: 03 December 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 王志刚.以改革驱动创新, 以创新驱动发展——写在“科学的春天”四十周年之际[EB/OL].（2018-5-19）[2018-7-10] http://www.most.gov.cn/kjbgz/201805/t20180520_139535.htm
[2] 赵彦云. “十三五”国家科技创新规划指标的相关统计问题研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2017(11): 1-7.
[3] WEIBLE C M, HEIKKILA T, DELEON P, et al. Understanding and influencing the policy process[J]. Policy Sciences,2012,45(1):1-21.
[4] HACKER J S. Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: the hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States[J]. American Political Science Review, 2004, 98(2): 243-260.
[5] SMITH K B, LARIMER C. The new policy theory primer[M]. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2009.
[6] SABATIER P. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein[J]. Policy Sciences, 1988, 21(2):129-168.
[7] 萨巴蒂尔. 政策过程理论[M]. 北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2004.
[8] WEIBLE C M, CARTER D P. The composition of policy change: comparing Colorado's 1977 and 2006 smoking bans[J]. Policy Sciences, 2015, 48(2):207-231.
[9] MALLETT A, CHERNIAK D. Views from above: policy entrepreneurship and climate policy change on electricity in the Canadian arctic[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2018,18(5):1323-1336.
[10]SUN Y, CAO C. The evolving relations between government agencies of innovation policymaking in emerging economies: a policy network approach and its application to the Chinese case[J]. Research Policy,2018,47(3):592-605.
[11] 柏必成. 改革开放以来我国住房政策变迁的动力分析——以多源流理论为视角[J]. 公共管理学报, 2010(4): 76-85.
[12] 许阳. 中国海洋环境治理政策的概览、变迁及演进趋势——基于1982-2015年161项政策文本的实证研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018(1): 165-176.
[13] 韦颖. 改革开放以来我国大学生就业政策的变迁——基于支持联盟框架的分析[J]. 高等教育研究, 2015(5): 48-54.
[14] 吴瑾. 科技型中小企业技术创新基金政策变迁研究——基于政策网络的视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2012(3): 366-371.
[15] 张国兴, 李佳雪, 胡毅, 等. 节能减排科技政策的演变及协同有效性——基于211条节能减排科技政策的研究[J].管理评论, 2017, 29(12):72-83.
[16] DHOHOON K L, JANG D. Expert views on innovation and bureaucratization of science: semantic network analysis of discourses on scientific governance[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2018, 45(1):36-44.
[17] GOKHBERG L, SOKOLOV A. Technology foresight in Russia in historical evolutionary perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017(119):256-267.
[18] HART M D. An agent, not a mole: assessing the white house office of science and technology policy[J]. Science & Public Policy, 2014, 41(4):411-418.
[19] DUFOUR P. Supplying demand for Canada′s knowledge society: a warmer future for a cold climate[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 2010, 53(7):983-996.
[20] SOOFI A S. A comparative study of Chinese and Iranian science & technology, and techno-industrial development policies[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017(122): 107-118.
[21] 〖JP3〗MANNING S. A Dynamic perspective on next-generation offshoring: the global sourcing of science and engineering talent[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2008, 22(3):35-54.
[22] WANG M T, ECCLES J S, KENNY S. Not lack of ability but more choice: individual and gender differences in STEM career choice[J]. Psychological Science, 2013, 24: 770-775.
[23] WANG M T, DEGOL J L. Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions[J]. Educational Psychology Review, 2017, 29(1): 119-140.
[24] 黄萃，赵培强，李江. 基于共词分析的中国科技创新政策变迁量化分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2015(9): 115-122.
[25] 刘忠艳, 赵永乐, 王斌. 1978—2017年中国科技人才政策变迁研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2018(2): 136-144.
[26] 盛亚, 于卓灵. 科技人才政策的阶段性特征——基于浙江省“九五”到“十二五”的政策文本分析[J].科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(6): 125-131.
[27] 曾婧婧, 王巧. 省级创新政策驱动创新能力的效果测评——以“十一五”至“十二五”期间中国省级面板数据为例[J]. 软科学, 2017(8): 25-30.
[28] 王海芸, 宋镇. 企业高层次科技人才吸引力影响因素的实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32(3):152-157.
[29] 〖JP3〗郑巧英, 王辉耀, 李正风. 全球科技人才流动形式、发展动态及对我国的启示[J].科技进步与对策, 2014, 31(13):150-154.
[30] 吴爱萍, 董明, 李华. “互联网+”与“大众创业、万众创新”政策结构分析——基于扎根理论和共词分析法[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018(10): 44-52.
[31] 罗敏, 朱雪忠. 基于共词分析的我国低碳政策构成研究[J]. 管理学报, 2014(11): 1680-1685.
[32] 苏敬勤, 许昕傲, 李晓昂. 基于共词分析的我国技术创新政策结构关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013(9): 110-115.
[33] 廖中举, 黄超, 程华. 基于共词分析法的中国大学生创业政策研究[J]. 教育发展研究, 2017(1): 79-84.
[34] 中华人民共和国科学技术部. 科技部关于印发《“十三五”国家科技人才发展规划》的通知[EB/OL].（2017-4-13）[2018-7-10] http://www.most.gov.cn/
[35] 姜春林, 陈玉光. CSSCI数据导入Bibexcel实现共现矩阵的方法及实证研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2010(4): 58-63.
[36] BRESSERS H P. Fundamentals for a theory of policy instruments[J]. International Journal of Social Economics, 1988（15）: 22-42.
[37] ROTHWELL R, ZEGVELD W. Reindusdalization and Technology[M]. London: Logman, 1985.
[38] 顾承卫. 新时期我国地方引进海外科技人才政策分析[J]. 科研管理, 2015(S1): 272-278.
[39] 中华人民共和国科学技术部. 中国科技人才发展报告（2016）[R].北京：科学技术文献出版社, 2017.
[40] 李拓宇, 李飞, 陆国栋. 面向“中国制造2025”的工程科技人才培养质量提升路径探析[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2015(6): 17-23.
|
|
|
|
