|
|
|
| Research on the Relationship between Structure Embeddedness, Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Mixed Model |
| Su Xin1,2,Zhang Hui1,Zhou Shengshi1 |
| (1.Business Administration of Shandong University of Finance and Economics;2.Research Center of Government Performance Evaluation of Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250002,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The structural embeddedness will help supply chain enterprises obtain more heterogeneous resources, which lays the foundation for the improvement of organizational performance. Based on the relationship between structural embeddedness, dynamic capabilities and organizational performance, this study empirically tested the effect of structural embeddedness on organizational performance. The results show that there is a significant inverted 'U' relationship between structural Embeddedness and organizational performance, that is, the structure embeddedness has an 'inflection point' effect, and excessive structural embeddedness is not conducive to the promotion of organizational performance; environmental dynamics plays a mediating-moderating role in the influence of structural embeddedness on organizational performance; learning capabilities and innovative capabilities play a moderating-mediating effect between dynamic capabilities and organizational performance. This study provides a useful reference to clarify the influence mechanism of the network structure on supply chain enterprise behavior, to solve the problem of resource constraints and enhance the dynamic capabilities.
|
|
Received: 24 January 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]张方华,左田园.FDI集群化背景下本土企业的网络嵌入与创新绩效研究[J].研究与发展管理,2013,25(5):70-80.
[2] MCEVILYB, MARCUS A. Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2005,26(11): 1033-1055.
[3] GRANOVETTER M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481-510.
[4] 吕一博,施萧萧,冀若楠.开放式创新对企业渐进性创新能力的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2017,35(2):289-301.
[5] 邵云飞,庞 博.网络嵌入与突破性技术创新:结构洞与关系强度的协同影响机制研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(10):15-18.
[6] 张悦,梁巧转,范培华.网络嵌入性与创新绩效的Meta分析[J].科研管理,2016,37(11):80-88.
[7] TICHY N M,TUSHMAN M L,FOMBRUN C. Social network analysis for organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review,1979,4(4):507-520.
[8] GULATI R. Alliances and networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998,19(4): 293-317.
[9] BURT R S. Structural holes: the social structure of competition[M]. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1992.
[10]UZZI B. Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: the paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(1):35-67.
[11] 李德辉,范黎波,杨震宁.企业网络嵌入可以高枕无忧 吗——基于中国上市制造业企业的考察[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(1):67-82.
[12] UZZI B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect[J]. American Sociological Review,1996(4):674-698.
[13] 李支东,金辉.企业产品创新与网络嵌入——组织学习的中介作用[J].管理评论,2016,28(1):62-72.
[14] KOKA B R,PRESCOTT J E. Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view[J].Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(9):795-816.
[15] TEECE D J,PISANO G,SHUEN A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18(7):509-533.
[16] EISENHARDT K M,MARTIN M. Dynamic capabilities: what are they[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10):1105-1121.
[17] LAURSEN K,SALTER A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(2):131-150.
[18] 于开乐,王铁民.基于并购的开放式创新对企业自主创新的影响——南汽并购罗孚经验及一般启示[J].管理世界,2008(4):150-159.
[19] 芮正云,庄晋财.农民工创业者网络能力与创业绩效关系:动态能力的中介效应[J].财贸研究,2014(6):30-37.
[20] 杜建华,田晓明,蒋勤峰.基于动态能力的企业社会资本与创业绩效关系研究[J].中国软科学,2009(2):115-126.
[21] DESS G G,BEARD D W. Dimensions of organizational task environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1984,29(1):52-73.
[22] JAWORSKI B J,KOHLI A K. Market orientation: antecedents and consequences[J]. Journal of Marketing,1993(3):53-71.
[23] SARBO W S, BENEDETTO D C, SONG M， et al. Revisiting the miles and snow strategic frame-work: uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2005 (1):47-74.
[24] 张婷,赵宁.服务供应链绩效的可拓评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2013(6):49-54.
[25] 王华锋,李生校,窦军生.创业失败、失败学习和新创企业绩效[J].科研管理,2017,38(4):94-103.
[26] 向永胜,古家军.网络结构嵌入、吸收能力与集群企业双元创新能力——基于内外整合视角的实证[J].企业经济,2017,36(4):66-72.
[27] WU L Y. Applicability of the resource-based: dynamic capability views under environmental volatility[J]. Journal of Business Research,2010(1):27-31.
[28] 芮正云，庄晋财，罗瑾琏.社会资本对获取创业知识的驱动过程解构——基于创业者能力视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016(1):58-68.
[29] 代海岩.价值网络内企业创新能力、企业间关系与资源利用战略及绩效[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(8):86-91.
[30] 赵艳萍,李锋,王远.新创企业网络能力及其对虚拟企业实践与绩效的影响研究[J].经济与管理评论,2017,33(6):47-55.
[31] 冯长利,张明月,刘洪涛,等.供应链知识共享与企业绩效关系研究——供应链敏捷性的中介作用和环境动态性的调节作用[J].管理评论,2015,27(11):181-191.
|
|
|
|
