|
|
|
| The Optimal Sequential Strategy of Learning Ambidexterity for High-tech Product R&D Project Based on the Knowledge Accumulation |
| Rong Jian1,2,Liu Xilin1,Tong Zehua2 |
| 1.School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072,China;2.School of Business, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract High-tech product is the integration of high-tech knowledge, and its R&D status has become one of the decisive factors in the growth of knowledge economy. Focused on the mechanism of organizational learning-knowledge stock-R&D performance, an optimal model of dynamic ambidexterity is introduced. After the model solving, results are obtained about the decision making of the optimal termination point, the optimal switching point, and the optimal input intensity of exploration and exploitation. Based on these results the optimal sequential ambidexterity strategy is given for the maximization of high-tech product's R&D performance. All of these conclusions can provide reference for the control of R&D rhythm, the formulation of learning strategy and the allocation of investment resources in the implementation of high-tech product development projects.
|
|
Received: 06 June 2017
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Rong Jian
|
|
|
|
［1］NONAKA I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation［J］. Organization Science, 1994, 5(1): 14-37.
［2］PISANO G P. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: an empirical analysis of process development［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 15(s1): 85-100.
［3］MARCH J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning［J］. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.
［4］DRACH-ZAHAVY A, SOMECH A, GRANOT M.Can we win them all? benefits and costs of structured and flexible innovation-implementations［J］. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(2): 217-234.
［5］O'REILLY C, TUSHMAN M. Organizational ambidexterity: past, present and future［J］. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2013, 27(4): 324-338.
［6］林枫，孙小微，张雄林,等.探索性学习-利用性学习平衡研究进展及管理意义［J］.科学学与科学技术管理，2015，36(4)：55-63.
［7］GUPTA AK, SMITH KG, SHALLEY CE. The interplay between exploration and exploitation［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4):693-706.
［8］ROTHAERMEL F T, DEEDS D L. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(3): 201-221.
［9］李南，田慧敏，邓丹. 团队知识学习的网络建模及分析［J］.中国机械工程，2006，17（22）：2366-2369.
［10］王寅，张英华，王饶，等.组织双元性创新模式演化路径研究-两种次优能力陷阱讨论［J］.科技进步与对策，2016，33（8）：93-10.
［11］穆文奇，郝生跃，任旭，等.企业动态能力倒U型作用的实证研究［J］.软科学，2016，30（12）：89-94.
［12］张志华，陈向东.企业学习方式、创新能力与创新绩效关系的实证研究［J］.系统管理学报，2016，25（5）：829-836.
［13］CANTNER U, MEDER A, TERWAL A L. Innovator networks and regional knowledge base［J］. Technovation, 2010, 30(9): 496-507.
［14］XIAO W, GAIMON C, CARRILLO J. Managing knowledge in a three-stage new product development project［C］. 2014 Proceedings of PICMET’14: Infrastructure and service integration: 1818-1826.
［15］LAURSEN K, SALTER A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2): 131-150.
［16］GIANLUCA C, ELISA OPERTI. Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(13): 1591-1613.
［17］张峥，高明明，陈清生.技术相似度对中国制造业并购创新绩效影响模拟［J］.科技进步与对策，2016，33（19）：69-75.
［18］CARRILLO J E, GAIMON C. Managing knowledge based resource capabilities under uncertainty［J］. Management Science, 2004, 50(11): 1504-1518.
［19］薛捷，张振刚.技术及市场环境动荡中企业动态学习能力与创新绩效关系研究［J］.科技进步与对策，2015，32（1）：98-104. |
|
|
|
