|
|
Effects of TMT Tie Strength and Team Reflexivity on Strategic Decision-making Performance |
Shu Yiming,Ye Chunming |
Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093,China |
|
|
Abstract Based on the perspective of the integration of social network theory and Top Management Team (TMT) theory, this study has constructed an effect model of tie strength and team reflexivity on the strategic decision-making performance. Then, the sample data of questionnaire has been empirically analyzed to test the model. The results show that TMT strong ties have positive effects on both decision-making quality and commitment. And weak ties have positive effects on decision-making quality, but negative effects on decision-making commitment. Team reflexivity has positive moderating effects on the relationship between TMT strong ties and decision-making quality, between strong ties and decision-making commitment, and between weak ties and decision-making quality. Meanwhile, team reflexivity has moderating effects on the negative relationship between weak ties and decision-making commitment.
|
Received: 03 November 2016
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Shu Yiming
|
|
|
|
[1]DOOLEY R S,FRYXELL G E. Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent:the moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(4):389-402.
[2]KHOJA F. The tread:organizational cultural values,practices and strong social intra firm network[J]. Journal of Business Strategie,2010,27(2):205-228.
[3]谢卫红,李忠顺,屈喜凤,等. 网络关系强度与企业技术创新关系实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(5):62-73.
[4]UZZI B. Social structural and competition in interfirm networks:the paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(1):37-69.
[5]COLEMAN J S. Foundations of social theory[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.
[6]GRANOVETTER M. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited[J]. Sociological Theory,1983,1(1):201-233.
[7]吴俊杰,王节祥,耿新. 企业家社会网络总是有助于提升创新绩效吗[J]. 科学学研究,2015,33(12):1883-1893.
[8]DE DREU C K W. Cooperative outcome interdependence,task reflexivity,and team effectiveness:a motivated information processing perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2007,92(3):628-638.
[9]WEST M A,GARROD S,CARLETTA J. Group decision-making and effectiveness:unexplored boundaries[C].COOPER & S E JACKSON.Creating tomorrow's organizations:a handbook for future research in organizational behavior[M]. Chichester:Wiley,1997.
[10]谢洪明,张颖,程聪,等. 网络嵌入对技术创新绩效的影响:学习能力的视角[J].科研管理,2014,12(12):1-8.
[11]熊焰,李杰义. 网络结构、知识整合与知识型团队绩效关系研究[J].研究与发展管理,2011,23(6):8-16.
[12]GRANOVETTER M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(6):1360-1380.
[13]GRANOVETTER M.The impact of social structure on economic outcomes[J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,2005,19(1):33-50.
[14]钟卫东,黄兆信. 创业者的关系强度、自我效能感与创业绩效关系的实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛,2012(1):131-137.
[15]NONAKA I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation [J] Organization Science,1994,5(1):14-37.
[16]ROST K. The strength of strong ties in the creation of innovation[J]. Research Policy,2011,40(4):588-604.
[17]VAN DE A H,ROGERS R W,BECHARA J P,et al. Organizational diversity,integration and performance[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2008,29(3):335-354.
[18]陈璐,杨百寅,井润田,等. 高层管理团队内部社会资本、团队冲突和决策效果的关系——研究综述与理论分析框架[J]. 南开管理评论,2009,12(6):42-50.
[19]LOYD D,WANG C S,PHILLIPS K,et al. Social category diversity promotes pre-meeting elaboration:the role of relationship focus[J]. Organization Science,2013,24(3):757-772.
[20]LAVIE D. Alliance portfolios and firm performance:a study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(12):1187-1212.
[21]窦红宾,王正斌. 网络结构对企业成长绩效的影响研究——利用式学习、探索式学习的中介作用[J]. 南开管理评论,2011,14(3):15-25.
[22]LEVIN Z D,CROSS R. The strength of weak ties you can trust:the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer[J]. Management Science,2004,50(11):1477-1490.
[23]LEONARD D,SENSIPER S. The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation[J]. California Management Review,1998,40(3):112-132.
[24]杨皎平,张恒俊,侯楠. 集群企业间关系强度对合作技术创新的影响——基于企业类型和创新类型的视角[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(1):280-287.
[25]JEHN K A,BEZRUKOVA K A. A field study of group diversity:work group context and performance[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,2004,25(6):703-729.
[26]王燕夷,彭灿. 非正式网络对研发团队绩效的影响——交互记忆系统为中介变量的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究,2012,30(4):581-590.
[27]李瑞强,李永强,陈晨. “欺生”还是“杀熟”——关系强度与非对称性对营销员间非道德行为意愿的影响[J]. 管理评论,2014,26(10):160-172.
[28]AMABILE T M,CONTI R,COON H,et al. Assessing the work environment for creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(5):1154-1184.
[29]WEST M A,GARROD S,CARLETTA J. Group decision-making and effectiveness:unexplored boundaries[C]//C L COOPER & S E JACKSON.Creating tomorrow's organizations:a handbook for future research in organizational behavior[M]. Chichester:Wiley,1997.
[30]JACKSON S E,MAY K E,WHITNEY K. Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams.[C]//R A GUZZO & E SALAS.Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1995.
[31]TJOSVOLD D,HUI C,YU Z. Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in-role and extra-role performance in China[J]. International Journal of Conflict Management,2003,14(2):141-163.
[32]蒿坡,龙立荣. 员工情感与创造力:一个动态研究模型[J].管理评论,2015,27(5):157-168.
[33]杨卫忠,葛玉辉. 研发团队任务与情感自反性对产品创新绩效的影响——基于长三角地区的实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(6):138-148.
[34]WEST M A. Reflexivity and work group effectiveness:a conceptual integration[C]//M A WEST.Handbook of work group psychology[M]. England:John Wiley & Sons,1996.
[35]HOEGL M,GEMUENDEN H G. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects:a theoretical concept and empirical evidence[J]. Organization Science,2001,12(4):435-449..
[36]RICHARDSON R M,SMITH S W. The influence of high / low context culture and power distance on choice of communication media[J]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,2007,31(4):479-501.
[37]DE DREU C K W,WEST M A. Minority dissent and team innovation:the importance of participation in decision making[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86(6):1191-1201.
[38]COLLINS CJ,CLARK KD.Strategic human resource practices,top management team social networks and firm performance:the role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2003,46(6):740-751.
[39]CARTER S M,WEST M A. Reflexivity,effectiveness,and mental health in BBC-TV production teams[J]. Small Group Research,1998,29(3):583-601.
[40]OLSON B J,PARAYITAM S,BAO Y J. Strategic decision making:the effects of cognitive diversity,conflict,and trust on decision outcomes[J]. Journal of Management,2007,33(2):196-222.
[41]LANCE C E,BUTTS M M,MICHELS L C.The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria:what did they really say[J].Organization Research Methods,2006,9(2):202-220.
[42]JAMES L R,DEMAREE R G,WOLF G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1984,69(1):85-98.
|
|
|
|