|
|
|
| The Dilemma of the Southern Nations Vision in Technology Foresight |
| Zhou Pin |
| Research Department, Wuhan Centre of Scientific and Technical Information, Wuhan 430023, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract With the rapid development of its innovation capability, China is gradually transforming from one of the Southern Nations to an innovation-led country, which is similar to Japan's previous path. The Southern Nations are faced with challenges for technology foresight due to their weak innovation capability and lack of knowledge accumulation, which may compromise the results of technology foresight. According to the theory of information asymmetry, there is a great of gap between the Northern and the Southern Nations in terms of information acquired. Generally, developed countries with more information (the North) are in a more favorable position; on the contrary, developing countries (the South) are at a comparative disadvantage. Therefore, if the South blindly copy the theory and practice of technology foresight from the North, they may fall into the trap of the Southern Nations' vision. With increasing impact globally, China is playing a very important role on innovation. In order to avoid the Southern Nations Vision dilemma, technology foresight should be carried out in the context of global innovation, and stay away from interference such as technological nationalism.
|
|
Received: 08 February 2017
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Zhou Pin
|
|
|
|
［1］日本技术预见中心.日本第七次技术预见——面向2030年的未来技术［R］.天津:天津市科学学研究所，译.2007:1-592，2015:1-103.
［2］周频.日本通产省神话终结给我们带来的警示［C］.济南:中国技术创新圆桌会议,2013.
［3］日本技术预见中心.日本第八次技术预见-德尔菲分析［R］.天津:天津市科学学研究所，译.2007:1-562.
［4］European Commission.The european innovation scoreboard 2016［R］.Brussels:European Commission Publications Office，2016:1-95.
［5］World Economic Forum.The global competitiveness report 2015-2016［R］.Geneva:World Economic Forum,2015:1-384.
［6］McKinsey Global Institute.The china effect on global innovation［R］.Shanghai:McKinsey Global Institute，2015:1-26.
［7］Cornell University.The global innovation index 2016［R］.Geneva:World Intellectual Property Oganazatio，2016:1-406.
［8］中国科学技术发展战略研究院.国家创新指数报告2015［M］.北京:科技文献出版社,2016.
［9］陈其荣.诺贝尔自然科学奖与世界一流大学［J］.上海大学学报：社会科学版，2010(11):17-37.
［10］马明杰.全球创新格局趋势及其影响［J］.经济纵横,2016（7）.
［11］周频.警惕战略性新兴产业中的几种陷阱［R］.柳州:科技进步论坛暨第四届中国产学研合作论坛,2016.
［12］杨林.华为这么多年来坚持做一个开放的群体［OL］.HUAWEI管理真经，http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzIyOTExODk3Ng==&mid=2649529637&idx=1&sn=49d71d363bde445eaed11a91ef46d59c，2015-06-23.
［13］周锡冰.华为管理课［M］.南昌:江西人民出版社，2016：1-296.
［14］周留证.华为哲学——任正非的企业之道［M］.北京:机械工业出版社，2015:1-384.
［15］任海英,于立婷,李振.国内外技术预见研究的热点和趋势分析［J］.情报杂志,2016（2）.
［16］孟宏,许晔,王菲菲.英国面向2030年的技术预见及其对中国的启示［J］.中国科技论坛,2013（12）.
［17］郭卫东.技术预见理论方法及关键技术创新模式选择研究［M］.北京:北京大学出版社，2013.
［18］查先进，陈明红，杨凤.竞争情报与企业危机管理［M］.武汉:武汉大学出版社，2011.
［19］李纲.情报学研究进展［M］.武汉:武汉大学出版社，2010.
［20］黄兆银，王峰.全球竞争中的“中国制造”［M］.武汉:武汉大学出版社，2006.
［21］商业周刊（中国台北）.给未来领袖的九封信［M］.上海:上海三联书店，2011.
［22］上海科学学研究所.上海科技发展重点领域技术预见研究报告（2013-2014）［M］.上海：上海科学技术出版社，2015.
［23］庄子银.创新、模仿、知识产权和全球增长［M］.武汉:武汉大学出版社，2010.
［24］黄兆银.R&D全球化研究［M］.武汉:武汉大学出版社，2006.
|
|
|
|
