|
|
Research on Assessment of Intellectual Property Risk of Crowdsourcing Platform |
Li En'ping,Zhang Zhenming |
Economic Management Insitute, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024,China |
|
|
Abstract As more and more enterprises begin to use crowdsourcing for innovation and cooperation, the features of crowdsourcing make intellectual property risks of crowdsourcing platform increasingly protruding and have a great influence on the healthy development of crowdsourcing platform. This paper constructs an evaluation index system, and proposes an integrated evaluation model that combines DEMATEL, ANP based on the correlation between indexes and D-S evidence theory. And we not only evaluate the intellectual property risk of Crowdsourcing Platform about InnoCentive but also draw a conclusion that the degree of risk of Zhubajie.com Website is very different from InnoCentive's. The main results may be summarized as follows: the high innovative crowdsourcing task is the most original factors which may course intellectual property risk and then result in rising of the intellectual property environment risk. The wrong management behavior of the Crowdsourcing platform is one of the most superficial reasons; The management of Crowdsourcing Platform is the most direct and effective channels to lower the risk. The management of the Crowdsourcing Platform and the management for intellectual property environment should be combined to reduce the risks which are irrelevant to innovation.
|
Received: 10 October 2016
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Li En'ping
|
|
|
|
[1]PENG G. On the legal issues about crowdsourcing and witkey[C]//e-Education, Entertainment and e-Management (ICEEE), 2011 International Conference on. IEEE, 2011: 293-295.
[2]林素芬,林峰. 众包定义,模式研究发展及展望[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(4):212-217.
[3]庞建刚.众包社区创新的风险管理机制设计[J].中国软科学,2015(2):183-192.
[4]HOWE J. Crowdsourcing: how the power of the crowd is driving the future of business[M]. Random House, 2008.
[5]MARJANOVIC S, FRY C, CHATAWAY J .Crowdsourcing based business models: in search of evidence for innovation 2.0[J].Science & Public Policy,2012,39(3):318-332.
[6]闫威,陈燕,陈林波.基于集值统计的动态联盟知识产权风险评价[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(6):28-31.
[7]汤春雷.企业合作创新中的知识产权风险浅析[J].经营管理者,2009(20):209-209.
[8]杨海.中国服务外包知识产权风险和适用法律研究[J].现代管理科学,2010(5):72-74.
[9]葛秋萍,汪明月.产学研协同创新技术转移风险评价研究——基于层次分析法和模糊综合评价法[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(10):107-113.
[10]田依林.基于模糊综合评判法的企业知识创新风险评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(8):149-152.
[11]黄清鑫,郭东强.一种基于BP神经网络的转型企业知识转移风险评价模型研究[J].现代情报,2015,35(1):108-113.
[12]陈振斌,张庆普.基于模糊神经网络的企业知识管理风险评价[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4):773-778.
[13]SUDER A, KAHRAMAN C.Multicriteria analysis of technological innovation investments using fuzzy sets[J].Technological and Economic Development of Economy,2016,22(2):235-253.
[14]李柏洲,徐广玉.基于方法集的合作创新企业知识转移风险评价[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(6):112-117.
[15]张伟,张庆普.基于模糊德尔菲法的企业知识管理创新风险评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(12):112-116.
[16]何瑞卿,黄瑞华,徐志强.合作研发中的知识产权风险及其阶段表现[J].研究与发展管理,2007,18(6):77-82.
[17]肖玲诺,史建锋,孙玉忠,等. 产学研知识创新联盟知识链运作的风险控制机制[J].中国科技论坛,2013,1(3): 115-120.
[18]SIALA H.Crowdsourcing project management to the 'open' community[J]. PM World Journal, 2013, 10(2): 1-17.
[19]孙旭玉.中国知识产权保护水平与影响因素的实证分析[J].理论学刊,2010(7):54-59.
[20]GABUS A, FONTELA E. World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL[J].Switzerland Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre,1973(19):5-57.
[21]TZENG G H, CHIANG C H, LI C W. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL[J]. Expert systems with Applications, 2007, 32(4): 1028-1044.
[22]王莲芬.网络分析法的理论与算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001(3):44-50.
[23]DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping[J].The Annals of Mathematical Statistics,1967:325-339.
[24]SHAFER G.A mathematical theory of evidence[M].Princeton: Princeton University Press,1976.
[25]LI W, CAO J, WU D. Multi-feature fusion tracking based on a new particle filter[J]. Journal of Computers, 2012, 7(12): 2939-2947.
[26]张博.基于证据理论的整装勘查区资源竞争力评价研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学,2015.
[27]李金玉,王曙燕,孙家泽.基于加权D-S的软件易用性评估模型[J].计算机工程与设计,2016,37(1):118-122.
|
|
|
|