|
|
|
| Analysis on the Development of the Science of Science and Innovation Policy Program in U.S. and Its Inspiration |
| Li Ning1,2,Yang Yaowu1,2 |
| 1.Shanghai Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Shanghai 201800,China;2.Shanghai Institute of Science and Technology Management, Shanghai 201800,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The National Science Foundation set up the science of science and innovation policy program (SciSIP) in 2006. SciSIP has made important progress in the data and method research and community construction after ten years. This paper focused on SciSIP and its results in the past years, summarized the process of SciSIP, analyzed the research results and challenges of SciSIP, and provided some suggestions for the development of the science policy research and the discipline construction of "The Science of Science Policy".
|
|
Received: 17 January 2017
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Li Ning
|
|
|
|
［1］樊春良，马小亮. 美国科技政策科学的发展及其对中国的启示［J］. 中国软科学，2013（10）: 168-181.
［2］刘立. 发展科技政策学——推进科技体制改革的科学化和民主化［J］. 科学与管理，2012（5）: 4-11.
［3］SCHUNN C D, PB PAULUS, J CAGAN, et al. Final report from the NSF innovation and discovery workshop: the scientific basis of individual and team innovation and discovery［EB/OL］. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/scisip/bcs_sosp_wkshp_rpt.pdf, 2006.
［4］COZZENS S, P REGAN, B RUBIN. Final report: NSF workshop on social organization of science and science policy［EB/OL］. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/scisip/ses_sosp_wksp_rpt.pdf, 2007.
［5］NSF, DIVISION OF SCIENCE RESOURCE STATISTICS. Advancing measures of innovation: knowledge flows, business metrics, and management strategies［EB/OL］．http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/scisip/srs_innov_metrics_wkshp.pdf, 2006.
［6］SOCIAL，BEHAVIORAL, ECONOMIC SCIENCES. Science of science and innovation policy: a prospectus［EB/OL］．http: / /www. nsf. gov /sbe /scisip /scisip_prospec. pdf, 2006.
［7］NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. Science of science and innovation policy: principal investigators′ conference summary, steering committee on the science of science and innovation policy principal investigators′ conference［C］/K HUSBANDS FEALING,A S BEATTY,C F CITRO RAPPORTEURS. Committee on national statistics, division of behavioral and social sciences and education［M］.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014.
［8］FUCHS E. On the relationship between manufacturing and innovation: why not all technologies are created equal［D］. Carnegie Mellon Working Paper, 2013.
［9］OWEN-SMITH J, C SCOTT, J MCCORMICK. Expand and regularize funding for human embryonic stem cell research ［J］. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 2012, 31(1):714-729.
［10］DOU W, X WANG, D SKAU, W RIBARSKY. Leadline: interactive visual analysis of text data through event identification and exploration ［J］. Proceedings of IEEE VAST, 2012, 93-102.
［11］FELDMAN M, A GRADDY-REED. Accelerating commercialization: a new model of strategic foundation funding ［J］. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2013. DOI 10.1007/s10961-013-9311.
［12］FELDMAN M, A GRADDY-REED. Local champions. In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurs ��窞 Transition to Philanthropy ［M］. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing，2014.
［13］HAEUSSLER C, L JIANG, J THURSBY, et al. Specific and general information sharing among competing academic researchers ［J］. Research Policy, 2013, 43(3):465-475.
［14］TAYLOR M Z , S WILSON. Does culture still matter? the effects of individualism on national innovation rates ［J］. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27:234-247.
［15］STUEN E. Aggregate evidence of localized academic knowledge transfer in the U.S. ［J］. Economics Bulletin, 2013, 33:1468-1478.
［16］STUEN E, A MOBARAK, K MASKUS. Skilled immigration and innovation: evidence from enrolment fluctuations in US doctoral programmes ［J］. The Economic Journal, 2012, 122:1143-1176.
［17］YOUTIE J, J ROGERS, T HEINZE,et al. Career-based influences on scientific recognition in the United States and Europe: longitudinal evidence from curriculum vitae data ［J］. Research Policy, 2013, 42:1341-1355.
［18］AGARWAL R, A OHYAMA. Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists ［J］. Management Science, 2013, 59(4):950-970.
［19］OH S, Z LEI, W-C LEE, J YEN. Patent evaluation based on technological trajectory revealed in relevant prior patents［C］/The 18th pacific-asia conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (PAKDD 2014), Tainan, Taiwan, 2014.
［20］OH S, Z LEI, W-C LEE P MITRA, J YEN. CV-PCR: a context-guided value-driven framework for patent citation recommendation［R］. The ACM international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM 2013), San Francisco, CA, 2013, October.
［21］PIENTA A, G ALTER, J LYLE. The enduring value of social science research: the use and reuse of primary research data［A］. iPRES2011 Proceedings, 2011.
［22］TEICH A H,I Q FELLER.Toward a community of practice: report on the AAAS-NSF SciSIP grantees workshop［R］,2009.
［23］TEICH A H,I Q FELLER.Building a community of practice II:report on the second AAAS-NSF SciSIP workshop［R］,2010.
［24］JULIA LANE. Big data, science metrics, and science policy, science of science and innovation policy［C］. Principal Investigators’ Conference, 2012.
|
|
|
|
