|
|
|
| A Comparative Study of Policy Tools for Innovation Strategic Planning Between China and America |
| Dong Yanchun,Xu Zhili |
| School of Public Administration,Beihang University,Beijing 100191,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the policy tool theory of Rothwell and Zegveld,took the policy text of "13th Five-Year" science and technology innovation planning in China and "America Innovation Strategy 2015" as the research objects,this paper made a comparative study of the policy tools of the two countries innovation strategic planning. The results show that the environmental policy tools are the most frequently used both in China and the US,and the ratio of environmental policy tools in China is higher than that in the United States; the proportion of supply-type policy tools in the two countries is similar,but the internal structure of China's supply-type policy tools is not reasonable; the demand-based policy tools are the least used in both countries,and the demand-based policy instruments in China are particularly low. Compared with the United States,China has some disadvantages such as over-overflow,misplacement and vacancy in the use of individual policy tools. Therefore,this paper draws lessons from the experience of policy tools using in America,and puts forward suggestions for improving the layout of policy tools for China's strategic planning.
|
|
Received: 13 December 2016
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Dong Yanchun
|
|
|
|
［1］2016 Global innovation index［EB/OL］.https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2016-report#.
［2］“十三五”国家科技创新规划［EB/OL］.http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-08/08/content_5098072.htm.
［3］A strategy for American innovation［EB/OL］.https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/strategy_for_american_innovation_october_2015.pdf.
［4］ROY ROTHWELL,WALTER ZEGVELD. Reindustrialization and technology［M］. London:Logman Group Limited,1985.
［5］HOWLETT M,RAMESH M. Studying public policy:policy cycles and policy subsystems［M］. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1995:80-98.
［6］ROY ROTHWELL,WALTER ZEGVELD. Industrial innovation and public policy:preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s［M］. London:Frances Printer,1981:19-30.
［7］KLEIN WOOLTHUIS R,LANKHUIZEN M. A system failure framework for innovation policy design［J］. Technovation,2005,25(6):609-619.
［8］INGRAM S. Behavioral assumption of policy tools［J］. The Journal of Politics,1990(52):510-529.
［9］陈劲.十三五的创新政策展望［J］.科学与管理,2015,35(1):3-6.
［10］张韵君.政策工具视角的中小企业技术创新政策分析［J］.中国行政管理,2012(4):43-47.
［11］张永安,耿喆,王燕妮.区域科技创新政策分类与政策工具挖掘［J］.科技进步与对策,2015,32(17):116-122.
［12］张治河,许珂,李鹏.创新投入的延迟效应与创新风险成因分析［J］.科研管理,2015,36(5):10-20.
［13］李凡,刘沛罡,刘姿含.中印信息技术产业创新政策工具比较研究［J］.科技进步与对策,2015,32(15):110-114.
［14］GEROSKI P A. Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy［J］. International Review of Applied Economics,1990,4(2):182-198.
|
|
|
|
