|
|
|
| Study on Proportion of Two Types of Industrial Generic Technology R&D Investment of Government and Enterprises |
| Sheng Yongxiang1,Zhou Xiao1,Wu Jie1,Shi Qinfen2 |
| 1.School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003,China;2.Division of Science and Technology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Given the strategic significance of Industrial Generic Technology R & D in the new situation of economic transformation and upgrading and the "Dead Valley" effect of Industrial Generic Technology R & D Investment, this paper established a Cobb-Douglas production function Investment Game Model of two types of investment between the government and enterprises.This paper obtained the Nash equilibrium of Generic Technology R & D investment under different circumstances of government budget proportion through solving the optimal response function.This paper also explored the optimal proportion of two types of investment between government and enterprises and verified the validity of the model through a case study.The study found that government investment in Industrial Generic Technology R & D should be more inclined to supply pre-research investment while enterprises investment should be more inclined to supply R & D investment. Meanwhile,the government should adjust its positioning and function according to the different stages of industrial development and take dynamic measures of different supporting ways and intensity to invest in Industrial Generic Technology R & D.
|
|
Received: 19 September 2016
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Sheng Yongxiang
|
|
|
|
［1］KANCS A,SILIVERSTOVS B.R&D and non-linear productivity growth［J］.Research Policy,2016,45(3):634-646.
［2］殷辉,陈劲.共性技术下异质企业对学研方合作行为的演化博弈仿真分析［J］.科技进步与对策,2015,32(8):101-107.
［3］龚利,郭菊娥,高峰.基础项目政府担保因素组成及其对投资激励作用［J］.运筹与管理,2011,20(1):164-172.
［4］方兆本,朱文超.技术溢出或能效恶化?——基于中国工业行业的实证分析［J］.预测,2013(6):40-44.
［5］刘洪民,杨艳东.制造业共性技术研发协同知识链及知识流动模型——模块化协同视角的研究［J］.科技进步与对策,2016,33(9):41-46.
［6］方文中,罗守贵.自主研发与技术引进对全要素生产率的影响——来自上海高新技术企业的实证［J］.研究与发展管理,2016,28(1):1-9.
［7］BAYKARA TARIK,ZBEK SUNULLAH,CERANOLU AHMET NURI.A generic transformation of advanced materials technologies:towards more integrated multi-materials systems via customized R&D and Innovation［J］.The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2015,26(1):77-87.
［8］NINA BOKOV,TOM MELUZN.Electronics industry:R&D investments as possible factors of firms competitiveness［J］.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2016（220）:51-61.
［9］赵红梅.优势产业中关键共性技术协同研发机制研究［J］.科技管理研究,2015,35(16):110-114.
［10］胡燕,王恬.关键共性技术在优势产业中研发协同机制［J］.科学管理研究,2014(6):48-51.
［11］刘芹,何彬斌,吕郑超,等.高科技产业集群共性技术合作研发模式研究［J］.现代管理科学,2013(4):43-45.
［12］ASCHAUER D A.Does public capital crowd out private capital［J］.Journal of Monetary Economics,1989,24(2):171-188.
［13］VAIDA PILINKIEN.R&D Investment and competitiveness in the baltic states［J］.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,2015(213):154-160.
［14］CZARNITZKI D,HANEL P,ROSA J M.Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation:a microeconometric study on Canadian firms［J］.Research Policy,2011,40(2):217-229.
［15］刘波,李娜,康俊俊.政府购买共性技术研发服务决策影响因素分析［J］.科技进步与对策,2015,32(22):1-7.
［16］LAZZARINI S G.Strategizing by the government:can industrial policy create firm-level competitive advantage［J］.Strategic Management Journal,2015,36(1):97-112.
［17］GUAN J C,YAM R C M.Effects of government financial incentives on firms' innovation performance in China:evidences from Beijing in the 1990s［J］.Research Policy,2015,44(1):273-282.
［18］王敏,方荣贵,银路.基于产业生命周期的共性技术供给模式比较研究——以半导体产业为例［J］.中国软科学,2013(9):124-132.
［19］刘洪民.协同创新背景下中国产业共性技术研发组织模式创新［J］.科技进步与对策,2013,30(13):59-66.
［20］“产业共性技术研发组织与基地建设研究”课题组.我国产业共性技术研发组织的现状、问题与政策建议［J］.中国科技成果,2008(17):26-29,32.
［21］程永波,李婷,陈洪转,等.复杂产品共性技术研发的政府最优成本补贴［J］.哈尔滨工程大学学报,2015,36(3):432-436.
［22］马晓楠,耿殿贺.战略性新兴产业共性技术研发博弈与政府补贴［J］.经济与管理研究,2014(1):73-78.
［23］BAIRAM E,WARD B.The externality effect of government expenditure on investment in OECD countries［J］.Applied Economics,1993,25(6):711-716.
［24］FURCERI D,SOUSA R M.The impact of government spending on the private sector:crowding-out versus crowding-in effects［J］.Kyklos,2011,64(4):516-533.
［25］ERDEN L,HOLCOMBE R G.The linkage between public and private investment:a co-integration analysis of a panel of developing countries［J］.Eastern Economic Journal,2006,32(3):479-492. |
|
|
|
