技术多元化、发明者网络嵌入与军民融合企业技术创新效率

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2021110092

科技进步与对策

2022, Vol. 39

Issue (23): 140-150 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2021110092

军民融合创新

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

技术多元化、发明者网络嵌入与军民融合企业技术创新效率

李小丽,陈蕾

（武汉纺织大学管理学院，湖北武汉 430073）

Technological Diversification, Inventor Network Embedding and Technological Innovation Efficiency of Civil-Military Integration Enterprises

Li Xiaoli,Chen Lei

(School of Management, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430073, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1363 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要采用随机前沿模型对2015—2020年中国内地107家军民融合企业技术创新效率进行测算，并基于军民融合企业专利数据构建技术多元化、发明者网络嵌入（结构洞和网络密度）等指标。运用社会网络分析与多元线性回归方法，实证分析技术多元化、发明者网络嵌入及两者交互作用、结构洞与网络密度的互补关系/平衡关系对军民融合企业技术创新效率的影响。结果发现：技术多元化、结构洞及两者交互作用对军民融合企业技术创新效率具有正向影响；网络密度及其与技术多元化的交互作用对军民融合企业技术创新效率具有负向影响；网络密度和结构洞的互补关系会抑制军民融合企业技术创新效率提升，但两者在军民融合企业内部的平衡关系能够促进军民融合企业技术创新效率提升。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李小丽
	陈蕾

关键词 ：技术多元化, 结构洞, 网络密度, 技术创新效率, 军民融合企业

收稿日期: 2021-11-03 修回日期: 2022-03-06

ZTFLH:

F273.1

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目（19BGL040）

作者简介: 李小丽（1974—），女，湖南衡阳人，博士，武汉纺织大学管理学院教授，研究方向为技术转移与专利战略；陈蕾（1996—），女，湖北荆州人，武汉纺织大学管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向为技术创新管理。

引用本文:

李小丽,陈蕾. 技术多元化、发明者网络嵌入与军民融合企业技术创新效率[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(23): 140-150.
Li Xiaoli,Chen Lei. Technological Diversification, Inventor Network Embedding and Technological Innovation Efficiency of Civil-Military Integration Enterprises. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2022, 39(23): 140-150.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2021110092 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2022/V39/I23/140

[1] 王萍萍, 陈波. 军民融合企业技术效率及其影响因素研究[J].管理评论, 2019, 31(4): 70-82.
[2] 王柏杰, 李爱文. 军民融合企业效率测算及影响因素分析——来自我国“十大军工集团”上市公司的证据[J].科技管理研究, 2016, 36(23): 67-73.
[3] 李翔龙,王庆金,王焕良,等.军民融合社会关系网络对军民融合新创企业成长的影响[J].科技进步与对策, 2021,38(16): 125-134.
[4] SMITH W K, BESHAROV M L. Bowing before dual gods: how structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2019, 64(1): 1-44.
[5] PACHE A C, SANTOS F. Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(4): 972-1001.
[6] 闫佳祺, 罗瑾琏, 贾建锋.军民融合企业突破性创新的实现路径: 基于“上海天安”的案例研究[J/OL].南开管理评论: 1-18[2021-10-11].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20210416.1041.006.html.
[7] 涂改革,张鑫磊,汪海粟.基于二次创新理论的军民融合企业创新差异研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2021,38(11): 106-115.
[8] BOLLI T, SELIGER F, WOERTER M. Technological diversity, uncertainty and innovation performance[J]. Applied Economics, 2020, 52(17): 1831-1844.
[9] CHEN C J, LIN B W, LIN J Y, et al. Technological diversity, knowledge flow and capacity, and industrial innovation[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2018, 30(12): 1365-1377.
[10] CEIPEK R, HAUTZ J, DE MASSIS A, et al. Digital transformation through exploratory and exploitative internet of things innovations: the impact of family management and technological diversification[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2021, 38(1): 142-165.
[11] YAYAVARAM S, AHUJA G. Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2008, 53(2): 333-362.
[12] WANG C, RODAN S, FRUIN M, et al. Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(2): 484-514.
[13] PARUCHURI S, AWATE S. Organizational knowledge networks and local search: the role of intra-organizational inventor networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(3): 657-675.
[14] KODAMA F.Technological diversification of Japanese industry[J].Science, 1986,233(4761): 291-296．
[15] ACOSTA M, CORONADO D, FERRANDIZ E, et al. Civil-military patents and technological knowledge flows into the leading defense firms[J]. Armed Forces & Society, 2020, 46(3): 454-474.
[16] 史良,曾立,孟斌斌, 等.新兴领域知识、技术、产业军民融合发展机理研究[J].公共管理学报, 2020,17(1):121-131,174.
[17] GARCIA-VEGA M. Does technological diversification promote innovation?an empirical analysis for European firms[J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35(2): 230-246.
[18] NAHAPIET J, GHOSHAL S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2): 242-266.
[19] WEN J, QUALLS W J, ZENG D. To explore or exploit: the influence of inter-firm R&D network diversity and structural holes on innovation outcomes[J]. Technovation, 2021, 100: 102178.
[20] REAGANS R, MCEVILY B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(2): 240-267.
[21] ACOSTA M, CORONADO D, FERRANDIZ E, et al. Patents and dual-use technology: an empirical study of the world's largest defence companies[J]. Defence and Peace Economics, 2018, 29(7): 821-839.
[22] TE KULVE H, SMIT W A. Civilian-military co-operation strategies in developing new technologies[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(6): 955-970.
[23] HEMPH?L? J, MAGNUSSON M. Networks for innovation-but what networks and what innovation[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2012, 21(1): 3-16.
[24] BURT R S. Structural holes : the social structure of competion[M].Cambridge：Harvard University Press, 1995.
[25] 郭将, 岳文瑞. 城市紧凑度与区域创新能力──以江苏省为例[J]. 技术经济, 2020, 39(8): 51-58.
[26] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
[27] AIGNER D, LOVELL C A K, SCHMIDT P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, 6(1): 21-37.
[28] PITT M M, LEE L F. The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1981, 9(1): 43-64.
[29] BATTESE G E, COELLI T J. Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992, 3(1): 153-169.