Prospective Governance Characteristics to Resolve Social Risks of Emerging Technologies
Chen Yu1,Ma Yongchi2
(1.School of Marine Law and Humanities,Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116033, China; 2.School of Political Science and Public Administration, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China)
[1] 张乐.新兴技术风险的挑战及其适应性治理[J].上海行政学院学报,2021,22(1):13-27.[2] 新浪网.中国新批准进口美国5种进口转基因作物[EB/OL].(2019-01-09).http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/future/agri/2019-01-09/doc-ihqfskcn5364489.shtml.[3] BECK U.Risk society: towards a new modernity[M]. London: Sage Publications,1992.[4] 苏竣,郭跃,汝鹏.从精英决策到大众参与——理性视角下的科技决策模式变迁研究[J].中国行政管理,2014,345(3):90-94.[5] 宋新宁,田旭.西方民主与决策效率的张力有多大[J].人民论坛,2017(6):34.[6] FRIEDMAN B, KAHN P H.Value sensitive design: theory and methods[M].USA:Washington, University of Washington,2002. [7] SELIN C, RAWLINGS K C, RIDDER-VIGNONE K D, et al. Experiments in engagement: designing public engagement with science and technology for capacity building[J]. Public Understanding of Science,2017,26(6):634-649.[8] KUDINA O, VERBEEK P P. Ethics from within: google glass, the collingridge dilemma, and the mediated value of privacy[J]. Science, Technology and Human Values,2019,44(2):291-314.[9] KRABBENBORG L. Creating inquiry between technology developers and civil society actors: learning from experiences around nanotechnology[J].Science & Engineering Ethics, 2016,22(3):907-922.[10] GIBBONS J H, GWIN H L.Technology and governance[J].Technology in Society,1985,7(4): 333-352.[11] IRWIN A. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance[J].Social Studies of Science: An International Review of Research in the Social Dimensions of Science and Technology,2006,36(2):299-320. [12] LATIFAH A, JAHI J M, NOR A R M. Stakeholders' attitude to genetically modified foods and medicine[J].The Scientific World Journal,2013,(58):516-742. [13] KLIJN E H, KOPPENJAN J. Public management and policy networks: foundations of a network approach to governance[J]. Public Management,2000,2(2):58-135.[14] CHILVERS J, LONGHURST N.Participation in transition(s): reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse[J].Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning,2016,18(5):1-23.[15] GUSTON DH.Understanding 'anticipatory governance'[J].Social Studies of Science,2014,44(2):218-242. [16] OWEN R, MACNAGHTEN P, STILGOE J. Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society,with society[J].Science and Public Policy,2012,39(6):751-760.[17] VOJ P, AMELUNG N. Innovating public participation methods: technoscientization and reflexive engagement[J].Social Studies of Science,2016,46(5):749-772.[18] OSTROM E. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change[J]. Global Environmental Change,2010,20(4):550-557.[19] THYNNE I, PETERS B G. Addressing the present and the future in government and governance: three approaches to organising public action[J]. Public Administration and Development, 2015,35(2):73-85.[20] ERICH G. One size fits all? on the institutionalization of participatory technology assessment and its interconnection with national ways of policy-making: the cases of Switzerland and Austria[J]. Poiesis & Praxis International Journal of Ethics of Science & Technology Assessment,2012,9(1-2):61.[21] TAVELLA E.How to make participatory technology assessment in agriculture more "participatory": the case of genetically modified plants[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2016,103: 119-126.[22] BRAUN K, K?NNINGER S. From experiments to ecosystems? Reviewing public participation, scientific governance and the systemic turn[J]. Public Understanding of Science, 2018, 27(6): 674-689.[23] DUTRNIT G, SUREZ M. Involving stakeholders in policymaking: tensions emerging from a public dialogue with knowledge-based entrepreneurs[J]. Science & Public Policy,2018,45(3):338-350.[24] EMERY S B, MULDER H A J, FREWER L J. Maximizing the policy impacts of public engagement: a European study[J]. Science Technology & Human Values,2015,40(3): 421-444.[25] BENYEI P, PARDO-DE-SANTAYANA M, ACEITUNO-MATA L, et al. Participation in citizen science: insights from the CONECT-e case study[J]. Science, Technology & Human Values,2020,(1):1-34.[26] SAARELA S R.From pure science to participatory knowledge production? researchers' perceptions on science-policy interface in bioenergy policy[J].Science and Public Policy,2019,46(1):81-90.[27] 刘宝杰.价值敏感设计方法探析[J].自然辩证法通讯, 2015,37(2):94-98.[28] LOEBER A, VERSTEEG W, GRIESSLER E. Stop looking up the ladder: analyzing the impact of participatory technology assessment from a process perspective[J]. Science & Public Policy, 2011,38(38):599-608.[29] 齐琳,张茜岚.转基因水稻重获安全证书[N].北京商报,2015-01-07.[30] ATTAR A, GENUS A. Framing public engagement: a critical discourse analysis of GM nation[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2014,88:241-250.[31] 国务院.落实发展新理念加快农业现代化实现全面小康目标的若干意见[EB/OL].中国政府网,2015-12-31.http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-01/27/content_5036698.htm.[32] HORST M, IRWIN A, HEALEY P, et al. European scientific governance in a global context: resonances, implications and reflections[J]. Ids Bulletin,2007,38(5):6-20.[33] GUSTON D H. Participating despite questions: toward a more critical appraisal of its conceptualization in a Flemish participatory technology assessment[J]. Science & Engineering Ethics,2011,17(4):691-697. [34] SIMCOCK N. Procedural justice and the implementation of community wind energy projects: a case study from South Yorkshire, UK[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016,59: 467-477.[35] 彭峰,翟晨阳. 核电复兴、风险控制与公众参与——彭泽核电项目争议之政策与法律思考[J].上海大学学报,2014,31(7):99-106.[36] 南方都市报. 彭泽核电质疑难消安全需由程序确保[N].南方都市报,2012-02-10.[37] 腾讯网.安徽望江发文要求叫停江西彭泽核电厂建设[EB/OL].2012-02-08.https://news.qq.com/a/20120208/000163.htm.[38] 陈瑜.价值前置型新兴技术治理的主体间互动关键点及路径研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2018.