|
|
Latent Profile Analysis of Platform Workers' Work Values and the Influence on Individual Behavior |
Cao Xia1,Zhang Yudan1,Qu Jiaojiao2,Wang Yujuan1,Liu Xiangyu3 |
(1.School of Business Administration, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China;2.School of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362000, China;3.School of Management,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387, China) |
|
|
Abstract The application of new technologies has changed the traditional mode of economic operation and management, and new ways of human resource management have brought a large number of flexible jobs to the internet platform. They tend to have a relatively loose connection with the organization with a certain or some type of task as the goal. Their job demands and work values are also greatly different from those of traditional employment. Platform employees pay more attention to the pursuit of personal value, focus on the benefits, experiences and fun brought by work, and pursue free working hours, an independent work environment, and independent work arrangements. Therefore, their job demands also tend to shift from salary and career promotion to income sharing, from corporate loyalty and organizational commitment to career satisfaction, and they have more traditional work values. In this context, it is of significance for the human resource management of platform enterprises to explore the individual differences in the characteristics of work values of platform employees and their possible influence.#br#Different from the traditional "variable-centered" research method, this study uses a typical "individual-centered" research method, i.e., latent profile analysis (LPA). Using the scale of 21-item work values revised by Meyer, it collects the data of flexible employees in different industries and different types of platforms across the country, with 300 valid questionnaires retrieved from network anchors, online novelists, graphic designers, we-media practitioners and other flexible employees. Three potential profiles of the work values of Chinese platform employees are identified as follows: the group of traditional work values , neutral work values and modern work values. Among them, the group of neutral work values is the largest (57.1%), and the scores in each item are at the medium level. This group is characterized by being unwilling to be stable and afraid of failure and responsibility, wanting to pursue ability improvement and personal growth, and often maintaining a neutral attitude. The group of modern work values (29.0%) score the highest in each item. They are characterized by the pursuit of individual development and ability improvement. They pay attention to creativity, innovation, the exploration of new knowledge and new skills, with a focus on material benefits as well as the experience and growth. The scores of the group of traditional work values (13.9%) are lower than those of the other two groups. Most of these groups choose platform employment under the pressure of survival or unemployment, and they still hold traditional pursuits of stability, comfort, and promotion benefits.#br#By further adding two different outcome variables to construct a regression mixture model, it is found that different categories of work value groups also show significant differences in employee creativity and work passion. Among them, the group of modern work values has the highest scores in the two outcome variables of creativity and work passion. It is because this group is more courageous in pursuing the realization of personal value. They value the benefits, experience and fun brought by work. The creativity level and passion level of the neutral work values group are in the medium state, while the creativity level and passion level of the traditional work values group are low. The main reason is that they pay more attention to leisure , stable and comfortable working conditions, and are unwilling to accept challenges, so they often choose to do things step by step in work, often lack passion for work, and find it more difficult to produce creativity. Moreover, there are significant differences in terms of age and educational background among these groups. The groups of traditional work values and the neutral work values have differences in terms of age and education background, respectively. This shows that the age and education level of the platform employees will affect the formation and development of their work values of the platform employees.#br#
|
Received: 12 April 2023
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 何勤,邹雄,李晓宇. 共享经济平台型灵活就业人员的人力资源服务创新研究——基于某劳务平台型网站的调查分析[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2017,31(12): 148-155. [2] 戚聿东,丁述磊,刘翠花. 数字经济背景下互联网使用与灵活就业者劳动供给:理论与实证[J]. 当代财经,2021,42(5): 3-16. [3] 王家宝,敦帅,黄晴悦. 分享经济视阈下企业人力资源管理研究——新变化、新挑战、新发展[J]. 管理现代化,2017,37(2): 104-106. [4] 何勤. 大数据驱动的平台型组织灵活就业人员绩效管理创新研究[J]. 北京联合大学学报,2019,17(1): 78-84. [5] 纪雯雯,赖德胜. 网络平台就业对劳动关系的影响机制与实践分析 [J]. 中国劳动关系学院学报,2016,30(4): 6-16. [6] 孙尚,耿家营,李洁. 变革型领导对新生代员工工作绩效的影响研究——基于职业满意度的中介作用 [J]. 哈尔滨学院学报,2021,42(3): 31-35. [7] DAHLING J J,GABRIEL A S,MACGOWAN R. Understanding typologies of feedback environment perceptions: a latent profile investigation [J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2017,101(8): 133-148. [8] SCHMIEGE S J,MASYN K E,BRYAN A D. Confirmatory latent class analysis: illustrations of empirically driven and theoretically driven model constraints [J]. Organizational Research Methods,2018,21(4): 983-1001. [9] STANLEY L,KELLERMANNS F W,ZELLWEGER T M. Latent profile analysis: understanding family firm profiles [J]. Family Business Review,2017,30(1): 84-102. [10] 尹奎,彭坚,张君. 潜在剖面分析在组织行为领域中的应用 [J]. 心理科学进展,2020,28(7): 1056-1070. [11] MEYER J P,AND P,ALLEN N J. Examination of the combined effects of work values and early work experiences on organizational commitment[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,1998,19(1):29-52. [12] MANHARDT P J. Job orientation of male and female college graduates in business[J]. Personnel Psychology,1972,25(2): 361-368. [13] 王天玉. 互联网平台用工的合同定性及法律适用[J]. 法学,2019,64(10): 165-181. [14] 赵青. 互联网平台灵活就业群体的社会保障困境与制度优化路径 [J]. 中州学刊,2021,43(7): 96-102. [15] 王延川,吴海燕. 数字劳务平台就业者权益保障体系构建 [J]. 陕西师范大学学报,2022,51(4): 155-166. [16] 常凯,郑小静. 雇佣关系还是合作关系——互联网经济中用工关系性质辨析 [J]. 中国人民大学学报,2019,33(2): 78-88. [17] WOOD A J,GRAHAM M,LEHDONVIRTA V,et al. Good gig,bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy [J]. Work Employment and Society,2019,33(1): 56-75. [18] 刘善仕,裴嘉良,钟楚燕. 平台工作自主吗?在线劳动平台算法管理对工作自主性的影响 [J]. 外国经济与管理,2021,43(2): 51-67. [19] 孙伟航. 平台就业者社会保险困境及对策 [J]. 合作经济与科技,2021,37(18): 116-117. [20] 赵熠婷. 平台型企业员工薪酬满意度对工作绩效的影响研究——以角色认同为中介变量 [J]. 产业创新研究,2020,46(17): 78-81. [21] SCHREURS B,VAN EMMERIK I J H,VAN DEN BROECK A,et al.Work values and work engagement within teams: the mediating role of need satisfaction [J]. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice,2014,18(4): 267-281. [22] 张建人,皮丹丹,甘怡群,等. 时间视角下工作价值观的内容分析:基于反应频次的分析 [J]. 中国临床心理学杂志,2019,27(2): 246-252. [23] 侯烜方,刘蕴琦,黄蓉,等. 新生代员工工作价值观对越轨创新的影响机制:标新立异还是阳奉阴违[J]. 科技进步与对策,2021,38(14): 143-150. [24] 侯烜方,卢福财. 新生代工作价值观、内在动机对工作绩效影响——组织文化的调节效应[J]. 管理评论,2018,30(4): 157-168. [25] 陈波,杨东涛. 评估型绩效考核背景下工作价值观对创新绩效的影响研究 [J]. 南京社会科学,2020,31(9): 58-65. [26] 苏斌原,张洁婷,喻承甫,等. 大学生心理行为问题的识别:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育,2015,31(3): 350-359. [27] GARTSTEIN M A,BELL M A,BRIDGETT D J,et al. Latent profile and cluster analysis of infant temperament: comparisons across person-centered approaches [J]. Developmental Psychology,2017,53(10): 1811-1825. [28] 陈明隆,刘笑晗,郭静. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下儿童父母社会支持与养育倦怠的关系[J]. 北京大学学报,2022,54(3): 520-525. [29] LI P F J,WONG Y J,GRANDERSON R M,et al. Comprehension,purpose,and mattering? a latent profile analysis of laypeople's beliefs about meaning in life [J]. The Journal of Positive Psychology,2022,17(6): 909-923. [30] 任华亮,杨东涛,李群. 工作价值观和工作投入的关系——基于工作监督的调节效应[J]. 经济管理,2014,36(6): 75-85. [31] 任华亮,郑莹,张庆垒. 工作幸福感对员工创新绩效的影响——工作价值观和工作自主性的双重调节[J]. 财经论丛,2019,35(3): 94-103. [32] ZHOU J,GEORGE J M. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice [J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(4): 682-696. [33] 吴士健,高文超,权英. 工作压力对员工创造力的影响——调节焦点与创造力自我效能感的多重链式中介效应[J]. 科技进步与对策,2021,38(4): 132-140. [34] VALLERAND J R,BLANCHARD,et al. Les passions de l'ame: on obsessive and harmonious passion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003,85(4):756-767. [35] 吴士健,高文超,权英. 差序式领导、创造力自我效能感对员工创造力的影响:中庸思维的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策,2021,38(17): 144-151. [36] VAZIRI H,CASPER W J,WAYNE J H,et al. Changes to the work-family interface during the COVID-19 pandemic: examining predictors and implications using latent transition analysis [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2020,105(10): 1073-1087. [37] 彭征安,任华亮. 知识型员工的创新研究——基于工作价值观的视角[J]. 江苏社会科学,2016,37(4):73-79.
|
|
|
|