|
|
Regional Industrial Transfer and Undertaking Capacity Evaluation:An Example of the Three Gorges Ecological and Economic Corridor of Yangtze River |
Fu Chenyu1,2,Qin Zunwen1,2,3 |
(1.Institute for Advanced Studies in Finance and Economics,Hubei University of Economics;2.Changjiang Academy of Development and Strategy,Hubei University of Economics,Wuhan 430205,China;3.Hubei Academy of Social Sciences,Wuhan 430077,China ) |
|
|
Abstract To implement the coordinated development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, it is essential to balance overall progress and breakthroughs in key areas. As the junction between the central region and the western region, the Three Gorges ecological and economic corridor of Yangtze River is not only an important support for the construction of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, but also a comprehensive experimental corridor for the implementation of the new development concept and the coordinated promotion of ecological priority and green development. It plays an important role in the overall strategic development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. However, the region is geographically unique. It is located not only in the middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River Basin, but also between the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration of the Yangtze River Economic Belt and the middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River urban agglomeration. Hence it is in the national key ecological function area, the ecological barrier area of the middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River and the fragile ecological environment area, and also in the national minority gathering area and the concentrated contiguous poverty-stricken areas. There are great differences in economic development level, ecological resource environment and industrial development foundation among different regions in the Three Gorges ecological and economic corridor of Yangtze River. Under the trend of gradient transfer of industries in the Yangtze River Economic Belt,it has become an important way to achieve high-quality development, green development and coordinated development by actively carrying out industrial transfer and undertaking in the Three Gorges ecological and economy corridor of Yangtze River. However, there is little literature on industrial transfer and undertaking in this region, and there is few relevant research on the combination of industrial transfer and industrial undertaking. Therefore, by studying the industrial transfer situation and undertaking capacity of the Three Gorges ecological and economic corridor of Yangtze River, this paper identifies the advantageous industries in the corridor and the key areas suitable for industrial undertaking, and puts forward policy suggestions for further optimizing the industrial spatial layout and promoting the coordinated development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.#br#By calculating the industrial development gradient coefficients of 39 industries in Chongqing, Yichang and Enshi in 2019, this study analyzes the trend of inter-regional industrial gradient transfer, so as to verify the advantageous industries suitable for transfer and the related industries can be undertaken in each region of the corridor. Then, by calculating the industrial undertaking capacity of 42 districts and counties in the Three Gorges ecological and economic corridor of Yangtze River from 2010 to 2020, this study analyzes the restriction factors affecting the industrial transfer and undertaking capacity, and selects the key areas suitable for industrial undertaking in each region of the corridor.#br#The results show that the industrial development of the Three Gorges ecological and economic corridor has the spatial characteristics of "high on the sides and low in the middle ", the inter-regional industrial transfer generally presents a development trend of being "from the outside to the inside". The overall capacity of industrial transfer and undertaking, as well as its industrial attraction capacity, industrial support capacity and industrial development capacity in each region present a dynamic trend of rising development, but the overall development level is low, the spatial development is unbalanced, and the regional development level is greatly different.#br#This paper combines industrial transfer with industrial undertaking, and incorporates resource and environmental factors into the evaluation index system of regional industrial transfer capacity, and makes a deep analysis of the industrial selection and industrial layout of the Three Gorges ecological and economic corridor of Yangtze River. It is of great significance for optimizing the industrial spatial layout in key areas of the Yangtze River Economic Belt and realizing the coordinated development of regional economic.#br#
|
Received: 28 June 2022
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 秦尊文,严飞,刘汉全.长江经济带区域协调发展研究 [M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2019. [2] 吴传清,陈晓.长江中上游地区产业转移承接能力研究[J].经济与管理,2017,31(5):49-57. [3] 王守文,胡向阳.长江三峡生态经济走廊战略空间、功能定位与共同体治理机制——国家社科基金重大项目“建设‘长江三峡生态经济走廊’研究”开题综述[J].三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,42(6):11-12. [4] 刘佳骏.长江经济带产业转移承接与空间布局优化策略研究——基于长江经济带11省市产业发展梯度系数与承接能力指数测算[J].重庆理工大学学报(社会科学),2017,31(10):60-70. [5] AKAMATSU K. A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries[J]. The Developing Economies, 1962, 1: 3-25. [6] VERNON R. International investment and investment trade in the product cycle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966, 80(2):190-207. [7] KOJIMA K. Reorganisation of north-south trade: Japan's foreign economic policy for the 1970s[J]. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 1973, 13(2): 1-28. [8] DUNNING J H. Toward an eclectic theory of international production:some empirical tests[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1980, 11(1): 9-31. [9] KRUGMAN P. Increasing returns and economic geography[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1991, 99(3): 483-499. [10] 赵张耀,汪斌.网络型国际产业转移模式研究[J].中国工业经济,2005,22(10):14-21. [11] 符正平,曾素英.集群产业转移中的转移模式与行动特征——基于企业社会网络视角的分析[J].管理世界,2008,24(12):83-92. [12] 张少军,刘志彪.全球价值链模式的产业转移——动力、影响与对中国产业升级和区域协调发展的启示[J].中国工业经济,2009,26(11):5-15. [13] 张友国.区域间产业转移模式与梯度优势重构——以长江经济带为例[J].中国软科学,2020,35(3):87-99. [14] 戴宏伟,田学斌,陈永国.区域产业转移研究——以“大北京”经济圈为例[M].北京:中国物价出版社,2003. [15] 展宝卫.产业转移承接力建设概论[M].济南:泰山出版社,2006. [16] 刘明,王霞,金亚亚.西部地区承接制造业转移能力评价及承接策略[J].统计与信息论坛,2020,35(8):91-101. [17] 金浩,隋蒙蒙.京津冀协同发展过程中河北省产业承接力研究[J].河北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,7(1):1-9. [18] 段小薇,李璐璐,苗长虹,等.中部六大城市群产业转移综合承接能力评价研究[J].地理科学,2016,36(5):681-690. [19] 孙威,李文会,林晓娜,等.长江经济带分地市承接产业转移能力研究[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(11):1470-1478. [20] 索罗丹,李凡,朱晓东.淮河生态经济带产业承接能力和承接方向分析[J].生态经济,2021,37(1):64-69,110. [21] 戴宏伟.产业梯度产业双向转移与中国制造业发展[J].经济理论与经济管理,2006,26(12):45-50. [22] 简新华,杨艳琳.产业经济学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2009. [23] KUMBHAKAR S C ,DENNY M ,FUSS M . Estimation and decomposition of productivity change when production is not efficient: a paneldata approach[J]. Econometric Reviews, 2000, 19(4):312-320. [24] 魏敏,李书昊.新时代中国经济高质量发展水平的测度研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35(11):3-20.
|
|
|
|