|
|
The Back-feeding Mechanism of Service Innovation to Product Innovation in Digital Environment: A single Case Study Based on Xiaomi Technology |
Luo Jianqiang1,2,Li Yujuan1 |
(1. School of Management,Jiangsu University;2.China Research Institute for Agricultural Equipment Industry Development,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212013,China) |
|
|
Abstract At present, with the in-depth advancement of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation, digital technology accelerates enterprise innovation, technology diffusion and industrial integration, and it has become a driving force for manufacturing enterprises and an important force for a company's competitive advantage. For manufacturing enterprises, the effect of digital servitization is becoming increasingly significant, and it has exacerbated the complexity of the relationship between service innovation and product innovation (two types of innovation). As service innovation evolves from the incremental type to the fundamental, service value creation will be increasingly influenced by product technology, making the two types of innovations more interactive. When the two types of innovations interact with each other to promote the in-depth transformation of services, digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence, blockchain and cloud computing, it helps to realize the two types of innovations. The application of digital technology to the front-end supply and demand interaction process generates and retains a large amount of evidence/information of services, extracts the customer demand information vaguely and converts the information into customer knowledge, which can help form a first-mover innovation advantage characterized by data expression. For this reason, this paper focuses on how to realize the back-feeding of service innovation to product innovation under the good circumstances created by digitalization.#br#First of all, this paper sorts out domestic and foreign literature based on innovation theory, knowledge-based theory and value creation theory,and constructs a service innovation feeding back product innovation mechanism in the digital environment. Secondly, in order to verify the effectiveness of the service innovation and product innovation mechanism of manufacturing enterprises in the digital environment, this paper uses the case study method to take the significantly digitalized and service-oriented Xiaomi Technology as the research object, and analyzes the evolutionary process of its product innovation and service innovation in the product-dominant logic stage and service-dominant logic stage. Finally, this paper follows the research paradigm of "value discovery—value creation—value realization", and deeply analyzes the value creation process of Xiaomi Technology from the perspective of knowledge transformation. With the greatest advantages provided by the digital environment, Xiaomi Technology collects, transmits, stores and analyzes customers' demand data and provides a platform that supports the realization of supply and demand interaction, so as to realize the extraction and transformation of customer demand knowledge-supply and demand interaction knowledge-experiential materialized knowledge. Knowledge enables service innovation to feed back incremental or subversive product innovations, confirming and refining the implementation process of the feed-back mechanism.#br#The results of the case analysis show that the product technology of manufacturing enterprises is the cornerstone of service innovation, the realization of service innovation for greater value creation requires the support of higher product technology and the service innovation relying on advanced product technology can help to achieve greater value added; the digital environment provides manufacturing enterprises easy access to data,so that enterprises are sensitive to supply and demand, which further enhances the synergy of the two types of innovation; the mechanism by which the realization of service innovation feeds back product innovation in the digital environment is the result of the internalization of manufacturing enterprises external knowledge. The acquisition of customer knowledge can update the knowledge base of the manufacturing enterprise instantly, promoting the enterprise's incremental and subversive product innovation. This paper uses the single-case study method to refine the mechanism of service innovation feeding back product innovation in the digital environment, and it corresponds with the objective reality that manufacturing enterprises could improve product innovation through service-based empowerment. The research conclusions open up the "black box" of service innovation enabling product innovation of manufacturing enterprises in the digital environment, help manufacturing enterprises to reconstruct innovation advantages, enhance industrial resilience and provide a theoretical reference for the two types of innovation collaboration of manufacturing enterprises under the trend of digitalization and service integration.#br#
|
Received: 13 December 2021
|
|
|
|
|
[1] MENNENS K,VAN GILS A,ODEKERKEN-SCHRDER G,et al. Exploring antecedents of service innovation performance in manufacturing SMEs[J]. International Small Business Journal,2018,36(5):500-520. [2] 罗建强,戴冬烨,李丫丫. 基于技术生命周期的服务创新轨道演化路径[J]. 科学学研究,2020,38(4):759-768. [3] 简兆权,刘晓彦,李雷. 制造业服务化组织设计研究述评与展望[J]. 经济管理,2017,39(8):194-208. [4] STOREY C,CANKURTARAN P,PAPASTATHOPOULOU P,et al.Success factors for service innovation:a Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2016,33(5):527-548. [5] 简兆权,曾经莲,刘艳. 服务供应链外部整合对企业运营绩效的影响机理分析——被调节的中介效应[J]. 管理评论, 2021,33(8):290-301. [6] LEHRER C,WIENEKE A,BROCKE J V,et al.How big data analytics enables service innovation:materiality,affordance,and the individualization of service[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems,2018,35(2):424-460. [7] 辛本禄,代佳琳. 员工跨界行为、知识共享与制造企业服务创新——基于知识基的调节作用[J]. 经济与管理评论,2021,37(4):85-96. [8] 罗建强,蒋倩雯. 数字技术作用下产品与服务创新:综述及展望[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020,37(24):152-160. [9] 陈伟,陈银忠,杨柏. 制造业服务化、知识资本与技术创新[J]. 科研管理,2021,42(8):17-25. [10] ARDOLINO M,RAPACCINI M,SACCANI N,et al. The role of digital technologies for the service transformation of industrial companies[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2018,56(6):2116-2132. [11] CHEN M,TANG T Y,WU S,et al. The double-edged sword of coopetition:differential effects of cross-functional coopetition on product and service innovations[J]. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2020,36(2):191-202. [12] NYLN D,HOLMSTRM J. Digital innovation strategy:a framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation[J]. Business Horizons,2015,58(1):57-67. [13] BUSTINZA O F,VENDRELL-HERRERO F,GOMES E,et al. Product-service innovation and performance:unveiling the complexities[J]. International Journal of Business Environment,2018,10(2):95-111. [14] HWANG B N,HSU M Y. The impact of technological innovation upon servitization:evidence from taiwan community innovation survey[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,2019,30(7):1097-1114. [15] VISNJIC I,WIENGARTEN F,NEELY A. Only the brave:product innovation,service business model innovation,and their impact on performance[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2016,33(1):36-52. [16] CUSUMANO M A,KAHL S J,SUAREZ F F. Services,industry evolution,and the competitive strategies of product firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2015,36(4):559-575. [17] NAMBISAN S,WRIGHT M,FELDMAN M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship:progress,challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy,2019,48(8): 103773. [18] KHIN S,HO T C F. Digital technology,digital capability and organizational performance:a mediating role of digital innovation[J]. International Journal of Innovation Science,2019,11(2):177-195. [19] CHESTER GODUSCHEIT R,FAULLANT R. Paths toward radical service innovation in manufacturing companies-a service-dominant logic perspective[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2018,35(5):701-719. [20] LERCH C,GOTSCH M. Digitalized product-service systems in manufacturing firms:a case study analysis[J]. Research-technology Management,2015,58(5):45-52. [21] BEN ARFI W,HIKKEROVA L. Corporate entrepreneurship,product innovation,and knowledge conversion:the role of digital platforms[J]. Small Business Economics,2021,56(3):1191-1204. [22] LPEZ-CABARCOS M ,SRINIVASAN S,VZQUEZ-RODRGUEZ P. The role of product innovation and customer centricity in transforming tacit and explicit knowledge into profitability[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2020,24(15):1367-3270. [23] CALOGHIROU Y,GIOTOPOULOS I,KONTOLAIMOU A,et al. Industry-university knowledge flows and product innovation:how do knowledge stocks and crisis matter[J]. Research Policy,2021,50(3):104195. [24] DE GUIMARES J C F,SEVERO E A,JABBOUR C J C,et al. The journey towards sustainable product development:why are some manufacturing companies better than others at product innovation[J]. Technovation,2021,103(6):102239. [25] 王康周,彭波,江志斌. 新一代信息通信技术在装备制造业服务化中的作用:基于我国4家企业的案例研究[J]. 中国机械工程,2018,29(18):2259-2267. [26] KROH J,LUETJEN H,GLOBOCNIK D,et al.Use and efficacy of information technology in innovation processes:the specific role of servitization[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2018,35(5):720-741. [27] MARKOVIC S,JOVANOVIC M,BAGHERZADEH M,et al. Priorities when selecting business partners for service innovation:the contingency role of product innovation[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2020,88:378-388. [28] CUI A S,WU F. Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation:antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2016,44(4):516-538. [29] CRESCENZI R,GAGLIARDI L. The innovative performance of firms in heterogeneous environments:the interplay between external knowledge and internal absorptive capacities[J]. Research Policy,2018,47(4):782-795. [30] CENTOBELLI P,CERCHIONE R,ESPOSITO E. Efficiency and effectiveness of knowledge management systems in smes[J]. Production Planning & Control,2019,30(9):779-791. [31] DIELEMAN M,SACHS W M. Coevolution of institutions and corporations in emerging economies:how the Salim group morphed into an institution of Suharto's crony regime[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2008,45(7):1274-1300. [32] 陈剑,黄朔,刘运辉. 从赋能到使能——数字化环境下的企业运营管理[J]. 管理世界,2020,36(2):117-128,222.
|
|
|
|