|
|
|
| Influence of Platform Leadership on Employees' Deviant Innovation Behavior: The Role of Felt Obligation and Team Motivational Climate |
| Zhu Yongyue1,Shi Rui2,Ouyang Chenhui1 |
| (1.School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;2.Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Innovation is of great significance to the development of an organization, and as the main body of organizational innovation, employees are an important driving force to enhance enterprise competitiveness and promote their innovation. Because of the risks of innovation behavior and the limited organizational resources, some employees' innovative ideas cannot be formally supported by the organization. In order to improve the interests of the organization, some employees will spontaneously and secretly make innovation, which is called deviant innovation. Deviant innovation is an effective way for employees to carry out innovation, and it is of great significance for promoting organizational innovation and development. Therefore, employees' deviant innovation behaviors that have not been fully explored need to be highly valued.#br#Existing research results on the antecedents of employees' deviant innovation are abundant, such as management process, organizational atmosphere, organizational resources at the organizational level, individual characteristics and work characteristics at the individual level, as well as leadership styles and leadership behaviors at the leadership level. With the development of "decentralization" and "de-leadership" in organizations and the rise of knowledge workers, platform leadership comes into being. Different from traditional statements, platform leadership, as a new style of leadership, is not centralization-oriented, but rather builds and optimizes a platform for employees to stimulate their potentiality and mobilize their enthusiasm for innovation, and ultimately achieve a win-win situation for both leaders and employees. Platform leadership provides employees with rich material conditions and psychological capital, and it pays attention to the cultivation of employees' sense of responsibility and spirit of innovation, and can effectively stimulate employees' innovative behavior. At present, there are few studies on the mechanism of platform leadership on employees' deviant innovation behavior. Following the social exchange theory and social information processing theory, this study takes the employees in high-tech enterprises as the research object, builds a mediating model of the effect of platform leadership on employees' deviant innovation behavior through felt obligation, and introduces team motivational climate as a moderating variable to explore the mechanism and boundary effect of platform leadership on employees' deviant innovation behavior.#br#The data is collected in the form of electronic questionnaires and distributed questionnaires in Guangdong, Beijing, Jiangsu, Henan, Hubei and other places with respondents of employees from pharmaceutical manufacturing, electronic and communication equipment manufacturing, medical equipment and instrumentation manufacturing and other high-tech enterprises. After screening and eliminating invalid data, 1 015 valid samples are obtained for regression analysis and hypothesis testing by SPSS, Amos,etc. The empirical analysis results show that firstly platform leadership has a positive impact on employees' deviant innovation behavior; secondly felt obligation plays a partial mediating role between platform leadership and employees' deviant innovation behavior; lastly team motivational climate not only plays a moderating role in the relationship between platform leadership and felt obligation, but also has a significant moderating effect on the mediating role of felt obligation.#br#Through the theoretical derivation and empirical analysis, this paper analyzes the specific mechanism of platform leadership on employees' deviant innovation behavior. The results have enriched and deepened the research in related fields, and have certain theoretical innovation and practical significance. First, in the Chinese context, this study further verifies that leadership style is an important factor affecting employees' deviant innovation, and enriches the theoretical research on the antecedents of employees' deviant innovation behavior. Second, based on the logic of social exchange theory, this study confirms that felt obligation is the mediating factor in platform leadership to stimulate employees' deviant innovation behavior, reveals the internal mechanism by which platform leadership positively influences employees' deviant innovation behavior, and makes up for the deficiency of existing literature on the relationship between platform leadership and employees' deviant innovation behavior. Third, the team motivational climate is introduced as a moderating variable to clarify the boundary conditions of the influence of platform leadership on employees' deviant innovation behavior. Finally it puts forward the suggestions on how to stimulate employees' deviant innovation behavior, and provides practical guiding significance for enterprises to improve the human resource management mechanism.#br#
|
|
Received: 15 July 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] MAINEMELIS C. Stealing fire: creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas [J]. The Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35(4): 558-578.
[2] AUGSDORFER P. Bootlegging and path dependency [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 34(1):1-11.
[3] 黄玮,项国鹏,杜运周,等.越轨创新与个体创新绩效的关系研究——地位和创造力的联合调节作用[J].南开管理评论, 2017, 20(1): 143-154.
[4] 王朝晖, 段海霞.员工资质过剩感对越轨创新的U型影响研究:悖论的视角[J].管理评论, 2022, 34(1): 218-227.
[5] 张云超,屠兴勇.知识型员工越轨创新行为触发机制研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(8): 131-141.
[6] 王弘钰, 崔智淞, 邹纯龙, 等.忠诚还是叛逆?中国组织情境下的员工越轨创新行为[J].心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 975-989.
[7] GLOBOCNIK D,SALOMO S.Do formal management practices impact the emergence of bootlegging behavior[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(4):558-578.
[8] UCZUK U B. The five factor model of personality and social support: a meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 2019, 81(8):38-46.
[9] 杨剑钊,李晓娣.前摄型人格对越轨创新绩效作用路径研究——创新催化的中介作用及变革型领导行为的调节作用[J].预测, 2019, 38(4): 17-23.
[10] JAISWAL N K,DHAR R L.Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity: a multilevel study [J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2015, 51(10): 30-41.
[11] 杨刚,宋建敏,纪谱华.员工创造力与越轨创新:心理特权和道德推脱视角[J].科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(7): 115-122.
[12] NORA M, ELLEN G, ZHENG C. Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance [J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96(4): 730-743.
[13] ZHU W, CHEW I K H, SPANGLER W D. CEO transformational leadership and organizational outcomes: the mediating role of human-capital-enhancing human resource management [J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2005,16(7):39-52.
[14] 李俊华,张春彩.双元领导、员工双元行为与企业创新绩效——员工主动性人格的调节作用[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,48(4):80-87.
[15] 王弘钰,邹纯龙,崔智淞.差序式领导对员工越轨创新行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J].科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(9): 131-137.
[16] 王弘钰,邹纯龙.变革型领导对员工越轨创新的影响——一个有调节的中介模型[J].科技管理研究, 2019, 39(2): 165-171.
[17] 吴士健,杜梦贞,周忠宝.和合文化情境下包容性领导如何影响员工越轨创新行为[J].科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(17): 142-151.
[18] 郭萌.何以激发越轨创新——双元领导与责任知觉的作用[J].科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(9): 49-54.
[19] 吴士健,杜梦贞,张洁.真实型领导对员工越轨创新行为的影响——组织自尊与建设性责任认知的链式中介作用及差错反感文化的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(13): 141-150.
[20] 郝旭光.平台型领导:自达达人[J].北大商业评论, 2014,12(9): 92-99,22.
[21] 郝旭光,张嘉祺,雷卓群,等.平台型领导:多维度结构?测量与创新行为影响验证[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(1): 186-199,216.
[22] 李玲,陶厚永,宋浩.平台型领导对员工主动创新行为的跨层次影响[J].科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(13): 132-140.
[23] FULLER J B,HESTER M K.Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2010, 27(8): 1089-1120.
[24] 王志立.下属管理过程中如何具备平台型领导特质[J].商业经济, 2019,38(10): 87-88,123.
[25] SALANCIK G R, PFEFFER J. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23(2): 224-253.
[26] OUYANG C, ZHU Y, MA Z, et al. Why employees experience burnout: an explanation of illegitimate tasks [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19(15): 8923-8945.
[27] 赵金金.差序式领导对知识型员工建设性越轨行为的影响机制研究[J].商业经济与管理, 2019,39(11): 42-54.
[28] NERSTAD C G L, ROBERTS G C, RICHARDSEN A M. Achieving success at work: development and validation of the motivational climate at work questionnaire (MCWQ) [J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2013, 43(11): 2231-2250.
[29] 陈威如,余卓轩.平台战略:正在席卷全球的商业模式革命[M].北京: 中信出版社, 2016: 54.
[30] 贾建锋,刘志.幽默不拘,创新不限:亲和幽默型领导与员工越轨创新[J].管理科学, 2021, 34(2): 69-80.
[31] EISENBERGER R, ARMELI S, REXWINKEL B, et al. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(5): 42-51.
[32] GOULDNER A W. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement [J]. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25(7): 161-178.
[33] 李金阳.社会交换理论视角下虚拟社区知识共享行为研究[J].情报科学, 2013, 31(4): 119-123.
[34] LIANG J, FARH C I C, FARH J L. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(1): 71-92.
[35] 杨浩,杨百寅,韩翼,等.建设性责任知觉对真实型领导与员工创新绩效关系的中介作用研究[J].管理学报, 2016,13(4): 533-541.
[36] CERNE M, NERSTAD C, DYSVIK A, et al. What goes around comes around: knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity [J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2014, 57(1): 172-192.
[37] CRISCUOLO P, SALTER A, TERWAL A L J. Going underground: bootlegging and individual innovative performance [J]. Organization Science, 2014, 25(5): 1287-1305.
[38] AIKEN L, WEST S, RENO R. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions [M]. London: SAGE Publications, 1991: 14-22.
[39] 王艳子, 田雅楠.包容型领导对员工建设性越轨行为的激发机理研究[J].外国经济与管理, 2019, 41(3): 54-69.
[40] 田启涛.服务型领导对员工顾客导向组织公民行为的影响机制——责任知觉的中介与领导权力感知的调节效应[J].经济经纬, 2017, 34(1): 112-117.
[41] 赵宏超,于砚文,王玉珏,等.共享型领导如何影响新生代员工建言 ——积极互惠与责任知觉的作用[J].中国人力资源开发, 2018, 35(3): 29-40.
[42] 田晓明,李锐.自我牺牲型领导能促进员工的前瞻行为吗——责任感知的中介效应及其边界条件[J].心理学报, 2015, 47(12): 1472-1485.
[43] 王弘钰,万鹏宇.效能视角下共享型领导?越轨创新对创新绩效的影响[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2020, 40(1): 84-97.
[44] 叶存军,何斌,孙旭,等.包容型领导在创新领域的双刃剑效应——违反规范可接受感知的中介和主动性人格的调节[J].技术经济, 2020, 39(11): 136-146.
[45] 刘晓琴.非伦理领导与员工创新越轨行为:多重中介效应分析[J].科研管理, 2019, 40(3): 188-196.
|
|
|
|
