|
|
|
| Construction of Extended Model of Knowledge Hiding Behavior Based on TPB |
| Liu Huan,An Liren |
| (School of Economics & Management,NorthwestUniversity, Xi'an 710000, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the era of knowledge economy, organizational managers try to encourage employees to share knowledge behavior through various strategies so as to improve organizational competitiveness and economic benefits. But under the division of labor management mode, knowledge sharing between employees is not easy to happen. Existing scholars have found that many employees are not willing to share their knowledge, and tend to hoard or hide knowledge, and further research results show that employees take knowledge hidden behavior by obstructing knowledge circulation and have a negative impact on individuals and organizations. Therefore it is worth of further analysis of knowledge hidden behavior.#br#By combing through the existing research, the study concludes the following deficiencies. First, the existing research is relatively scattered, and there is the need to construct a comprehensive and systematic theoretical framework to clarify the formation path of knowledge hidden behavior and the internal link between the influencing factors. Given the complexity of the occurrence of individual behavior, the study of knowledge hidden behavior based on a theory and variables obviously does not conform to the law of individual behavior, and thus it is insufficient to explain the occurrence mechanism of individual knowledge hidden behavior. Next, knowledge hiding willingness is key to understanding the complex knowledge hiding behavior process. Existing research equates knowledge hiding willingness to knowledge hiding behavior, and makes no distinction between knowledge hidden will and knowledge hiding behavior; it fails to explicitly state whether the antecedent variables has an effect on knowledge hidden willingness or knowledge hiding behavior. Third it is uncertain if the transformation between willingness to hide knowledge and knowledge hidden behavior is affected by other variables. In view of the above problems, this study with TPB as the basic theoretical framework is from the perspective of social psychology, and concludes the economic, social and psychological factors based on motivation theory, social exchange theory, psychological possession theory, etc. to build knowledge hidden behavior expansion model, and then forms a more systematic knowledge hidden behavior interpretation system.#br#This study constructs an expansion model of knowledge hidden behavior based on the literature research method, and puts forward the following findings. First, knowledge hidden attitude is affected by psychological distance and outcome expectations, Knowledge hiding subjective norms are influenced by network conventions in the structure of an organizational network, Knowledge hidden perceptual behavior control is affected by knowledge power and knowledge psychological ownership. Second, knowledge hidden willingness is influenced by knowledge hidden behavior attitude, knowledge hidden subjective norms, knowledge hidden perceived behavior control and past behaviors. Knowledge hidden willingness and knowledge hidden perceptual behavior control predict the occurrence of knowledge hidden behavior; while innovation atmosphere, dual leadership and big fifth personality play a moderating role between knowledge hidden will and knowledge hidden behavior.#br#The extended model reveals the formation path of employees'knowledge-hiding behavior and the internal relations among the influencing factors. In a specific organizational environment, under the influence of a series of exogenous variables, including result expectation, psychological distance, network convention, knowledge power and knowledge psychological ownership, the more positive the knowledge owner’s attitude to knowledge hiding behavior is, the greater influence of the network knot and the more benefits obtained from the knowledge hiding behavior in the past, the stronger the willingness to take knowledge hiding behavior, and the greater chance of knowledge hiding behavior. In the process of employees'knowledge-hiding intention changing into knowledge-hiding behavior, the intensity of the transformation between the two is influenced by group, organizational context and individual characteristics, and organizational context involves innovation climate, encirclement and dual leadership.#br#The construction of the above expansion model helps to improve the interpretation of TPB and expand the scope of application, and it provides an in-depth understanding of the behavior logic behind employees' knowledge hidden behavior, and is of great theoretical significance and practical value for reducing knowledge hidden behavior, promoting knowledge flow, and formulating management system.#br#
|
|
Received: 27 May 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] CONNELLY C E, ZWEIG D, WEBSTER J, et al. Knowledge hiding in organizations[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33(1): 64-88.
[2] 杨陈,唐明凤.竞争氛围感知对员工知识隐藏行为的影响机制[J].科技进步与对策,2018, 35(17):131-138.
[3] CERNE M, N ERSTAD C, DYSVIK A, ET AL. What goes around comes around: knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(1):172-192.
[4] BABIC K, CERNE M, KERLAVAJ M, et al. The inter-play amongprosocial motivation，cultural tightness, and uncertainty avoidance inpredicting knowledgehiding[J]. Economic & Business Review, 2018, 20(3): 395-422.
[5] SHAOPENG ZHANG,XIAOHONG WANG. Effect of knowledge hiding on knowledge innovative behavior of innovative team members[J]. Scientometrics,2021,1-20.
[6] MEN CHENGHAO, FONG PATRICK SW, HUO WEIWEI, et al. Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: a moderated mediation model of psychological safety and mastery climate[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018:1-12.
[7] 付晔, 彭秋萍, 钟熙.工作自主性、组织阻碍感知与员工知识隐藏 [J].软科学,2020,34(6):131-135.
[8] 肖小虹, 王婷婷, 陆露.自恋型领导对知识隐藏的影响研究: 道德认同的调节作用 [J].山东财经大学学报, 2020,32(6):67-75.
[9] 王成军,谢婉赢.组织动机氛围对员工知识隐藏行为的影响[J].科技进步与对策，2021,38(21)：101-107.
[10] 李锡元, 张秋, 王红梅. 创新时间压力与知识隐藏相关机制研究[J].华东经济管理,2021,35(2):57-64.
[11] SIACHOU EVANGELIA, TRICHINA ELENI, PAPASOLOMOU IOANNA,et al. Why do employees hide their knowledge and what are the consequences? a systematic literature review[J]. Journal of Business Research,2021,135: 195-213.
[12] ISSAC ABRAHAM CYRIL,ISSAC THOMAS GREGOR,BARAL RUPASHREE,et al. Why you hide what you know: neuroscience behind knowledge hiding[J]. Knowledge and Process Management,2021,28(3): 266-276.
[13] YUNXIA SU. The Influence of career plateau on knowledge hiding of knowledge workers[J].Journal of Business Administration Research,2021,4(2): 33-47.
[14] 肖瑶, 党兴华. 基于跨层级视角的网络惯例治理机理研究[J]. 管理评论, 2018,30(8):90-101.
[15] BECKER M C. A framework for applying organizational routines in empirical research:linking antecedents, char-acteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2005,14(5):817-846.
[16] LATIFF H S，HASSAN A. Rise and fall of knowledge power: an in-depthinvestigation [J]. Humanomics, 2008,24(1):17-27.
[17] 杨毅, 党兴华, 成泷. 技术创新网络分裂断层与知识共享:网络位置和知识权力的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2018,39(9):59-67.
[18] PIERCE JON L, KOSTOVA T, DIRKS KURT T. Toward a theory of psychological ownership in original organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001,26(2):298-310.
[19] 陈建军, 王正沛, 李国鑫. 中国宇航企业组织结构与创新绩效:动态能力和创新氛围的中介效应[J]. 中国软科学,2018(11):122-130.
[20] 王欣, 徐明. 企业创新组织软环境、知识管理、创新绩效? 动态环境下有调节的中介作用模型[J]. 华东经济管理, 2018,32(2):35-42.
[21] 吴迪. 创新氛围、知识管理能力和突破性创新能力的相关性研究[J]. 科技管理研究,2018,38(15):177-182.
[22] 郭萌. 何以激发越轨创新—双元领导与责任知觉的作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(9):49-54.
[23] 叶存军, 何斌, 孙旭等.包容型领导在创新领域的双刃剑效应—违反规范可接受感知的中介和主动性人格的调节[J]. 技术经济, 2020,39(11):136-146.
[24] 范世根. 授权型领导对知识隐藏行为的影响机制研究[D]. 重庆：西南大学, 2020.
[25] 姜荣萍, 何亦名. 组织心理所有权如何影响知识隐藏行为—公民疲劳与变革型领导的作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(22):116-124.
[26] KHOLA MASOOD. Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding behavior:a dual moderated mediation path analysis[D].北京：对外经济贸易大学,2020.
[27] 罗瑾琏, 管建世, 钟竞,等. 迷雾中的抉择:创新背景下企业管理者悖论应对策略与路径研究[J]. 管理世界, 2018,34(11):156-173.
[28] 谷盟, 弋亚群, 刘怡. CEO双元领导与企业创新导向的关系[J].管理科学,2018,30(3):51-61.
[29] 黄希庭. 人格研究中的一些辩证关系[J].西南大学学报:社会科学版, 2011, 37(1):1-7.
[30] ZOE WILKS, ADAM M. PERKINS, ANDREW COOPER, et al. Relationship of a big five personality questionnaire to the symptoms of affective disorders[J]. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2020, 277: 14-20.
[31] LIN H H, WANG Y S. Investigating the effect of university students personality traits on knowledge withholding intention: a multi-theory perspective[J]. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 2012, 2(4): 354-357.
[32] ORBELL S, HODGKINS S, SHEERAN P. Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1997,23:945-954.
[33] 段文婷, 江光荣. 计划行为理论述评[J].心理科学进展, 2008, 16(2):315-320.
[34] BAGOZZI R P, WONG N, ABE S, et al. Cultural and situational contingencies and the theory of reasoned action:application to fast food restaurant consumption[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2000,9:97-106.
[35] 高红丽,高丽英,范双双.基于计划行为理论的防御性驾驶行为意向分析模型[J].公路交通科技,2020,37(3):137-144.
[36] GOLES T, JAYATILAKA B, GEORGE B, et al. Soft lifting: exploring determinants of attitude[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2008,7(4):481-499.
[37] GODIN G, KOK G. The theory of planned behavior:a review of itsapplications to health-related behaviors[J]. American journal of health promotion,1996,11(2):87-98.
[38] ELLIOTT M A, ARMITAGE C J, BAUGHAN C J.Using the theory of planned bahavior to predict observed driving behavioe[J].British Journal of Social Psychology,2007,6(1):69-90.
[39] 赵斌,栾虹,李新建,付庆凤.科技人员创新行为产生机理研究——基于计划行为理论[J].科学学研究,2013,31(2):286-297.
[40] 何俊琳,刘彤,陈毅文.知识共享的影响因素研究——基于TOE框架[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(9):145-153.
[41] AJZEN I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy,locus of control，and the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2002, 32(4):665-683.
[42] KATHRYN GREENE, JEROLD L. HALE, DONALD L RUBIN. A test of the theory of reasoned action in the context of condom use and AIDS[J]. Communication Reports，1997，10(1)：21-33
[43] YADAV R，PATHAK G S.Determinants of consumers green purchase behavior:applying and extending the theory of planned behavior[J].Ecological Economies，2017,134:114-122.
[44] 王建明,吴龙昌. 家庭节水行为响应机制研究:道家价值观视阈下的 TPB 拓展模型[J].财经论丛, 2016(5):105-113.
[45] DORCE LETHICIA CAMILA, DA SILVA MARCELO CORREA, MAUAD JULIANA ROSA CARRIJO,et al.Extending the theory of planned behavior to understand consumer purchase behavior for organic vegetables in Brazil: the role of perceived health benefits, perceived sustainability benefits and perceived price[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2021,91: 104191.
|
|
|
|
