|
|
|
| The Exercise Logic of Co-ownership of Job-based Scientific and Technological Achievements in the Context of the Empowerment Reform |
| Ge Zhangzhi |
| (Institute of Intellectual Property, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The job-based S&T achievements account for the vast majority of the total S&T achievements, and their transformation and implementation are of great significance to economic and social development both in China and overseas. The reform measure to endow scientific research personnel with the ownership of scientific and technological achievements is to stimulate the enthusiasm of scientific research personnel for innovation and entrepreneurship through the way of property right incentive, and itopens up a new path to promote the transformation of S&T achievements. However, the co-ownership of the job-based S&T achievements achieved through the empowerment has its particularity in the source of rights, subject, object and procedure. In the early stage, the academic and practical circles have conducted in-depth discussions on the ownership of S&T achievements,the theoretical basis for empowering scientific research personnel the ownership of job-based S&T achievements and so on. However, with the pilot advancement of empowerment reform, the focus is further shifted to the issue of how to exercise the co-ownership of job-based S&T achievements after empowerment. This paper attempts to explore this issue, and systematically discussescoordinate the rights and responsibilities between researchers and units,design the agreed contents under the constraint of legal rules, and how to prevent the risks related to the exercise of rights.#br#This paper takes the empowered co-ownership of job-based S&T achievements as the research object, investigates its static connotation representation and dynamic exercise requirements, demonstrates the value of shared rights between researchers and units from the perspective of path expansion, and emphasizes the coordination scheme of multiple objectives under the established path and the solutions to relevant risk problems andbreak down the mechanism obstacles that restrict the transformation of S&T achievements.#br#The results show that the special acquisition of co-ownership of job-based S&T achievements is mainly manifested in four aspects: the source of right is based on the existing unit's separate ownership, the object is related to the specific job-based S&T achievements, the subject starts from the transformation path selection of scientific research personnel, and the procedure is based on meeting the necessary process conditions. The standardized exercise of the co-ownership of job-based S&T achievements requires the joint exercise of scientific research personnel and the unit, the independent exercise of the co-owner, the classified exercise according to the forms of different S&T achievements, and the coordinated exercise within and outside the unit. In the process of exercise of rights, it is essential to pay attention to the balance of the relationship between the unit and scientific research personnel, the relationship between the R&D and the transformation, the relationship between the transformation of S&T achievements and the management of state-owned assets, and the relationship between S&T development and S&T security. At the same time, it is necessary to refine and improve the ownership autonomy rules of scientific research personnel and the unit to prevent risks such as the elimination of co-ownership caused by the difficulty of maintaining the co-ownership relationship, the recovery of rights caused by improper behavior after the empowerment, the formalistic evaluation of S&T achievements before market pricing, and the rejection of the entry of undertaking enterprises to the unit’s investment.#br#From the dual perspective of ontology and operation theory, this paper examines the goal pursuit and realization process of the empowerment co-ownership, which is a relatively holistic research on the empowerment of job-based S&T achievements, and complements the research on the ownership identification of job-based S&T achievements and the way selection, participation process, influencing factors and performance evaluation of the transformation of S&T achievements. It also has enlightening significance for the construction of the corresponding theoretical system. Although the co-ownership model of job-based S&T achievements also has its own shortcomings, in the context of the pilot empowerment reform, it is necessary to explore this model from the perspective of multi-path selection that is conducive to the transformation of S&T achievements, to estimate the relevant problems in the co-ownership path, and clarify the exercise logic of co-ownership of job-based S&T achievements, so as to jointly promote the smoothness and efficiency of the new path for the transformation of S&T achievements. The research results of this paper can provide guidance for researchers to participate in the path selection of achievement transformation activities.#br#
|
|
Received: 18 September 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 科技部.科技部等9部门印发《赋予科研人员职务科技成果所有权或长期使用权试点实施方案》的通知[EB/OL].[2020-05-18].http://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2020/202005/t20200518_153 996.html.[2] 科技部.科技部关于印发《赋予科研人员职务科技成果所有权或长期使用权试点单位名单》的通知[EB/OL].[2020-10-19].http://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/qtwj/qtwj2020/202010/t20201019_159267.html.[3] 吴寿仁.科技成果转化若干热点问题解析（十四）——科研人员科技成果所有权探析[J].科技中国，2018，23（7）：28-36.[4] 邓恒.理顺三大关系 推进职务科技成果赋权[N].科技日报，2021-01-08（5）.[5] 李锡鹤.论共有[J].法学，2003，48（2）：28-34.[6] 肖尤丹，刘鑫.我国科技成果权属改革的历史逻辑——从所有制、科技成果所有权到知识产权[J].中国科学院院刊，2021，36（4）：464-474.[7] 王影航.高校职务科技成果混合所有制的困境与出路[J].法学评论，2020，41（2）：68-78.[8] 新华社.全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改《中华人民共和国促进科技成果转化法》的决定[EB/OL].[2015-08-29].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2015-08/30/content_2922322.htm.[9] 谢地.国有资产管理制度的法律调整路径——以新《促进科技成果转化法》的实施为背景[J].南京邮电大学学报（社会科学版），2017，19（4）：40-50.[10] 贾佳，赵兰香，万劲波.职务发明制度促进科技成果转化中外比较研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理，2015，36（7）：3-10.[11] TSENG A A, RAUDENSKY M. Assessments of technology transfer activities of US universities and associated impact of Bayh-Dole Act [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(3)：1851-1869.[12] 楚道文，丛培虎，余晓龙.职务科技成果共有权的政策要义及制度路径[J].中国科技论坛，2021，37（3）：36-42，52.[13] 李强，暴丽艳，郝丽.基于最优委托权安排模型的职务科技成果混合所有制研究[J].科技管理研究，2019，29（5）：191-198.[14] 宋河发，吴博，吕磊.促进科技成果转化知识产权实施权制度研究[J].科学学研究，2016，34（9）：1319-1325.[15] ZHANG H, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Y T. Conversion efficiency and countermeasures of China′s scientific and technological achievements [J]. Journal of Convergence Information Technology,2012,7(19): 1101-1115.[16] 陈之荣，王智源，王辉.知识产权共有问题研究[J].知识产权，2013，27（12）：68-72.[17] 财政部.关于进一步加大授权力度 促进科技成果转化的通知[EB/OL].[2019-10-11].http://zcgls.mof.gov.cn/zhengcefabu/201910/t20191011_3399709.htm.[18] Centre for European Economic Research. Individual versus institutional ownership of university-discovered inventions[EB/OL].[2015-10-11] https://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp15007.pdf.[19] NEBOJSA STOJCIC. Collaborative innovation in emerging innovation systems: evidence from Central and Eastern Europe[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2021，46(5): 531-562.[20] 李政刚.赋予科研人员职务科技成果所有权的法律释义及实现路径[J].科技进步与对策，2020，37（5）：124-130.[21] 卢章平，王晓晶.国家和地方科技成果转化政策对比分析[J].图书情报工作，2012，57（24）：83-88.[22] 唐素琴，曾心怡，卓柳俊.财政资助科技成果共有制与成果转化关系的考察[J].科技促进发展，2019，16（9）：934-942.[23] 申轶男，李岭，李宪振.基于多主体协同创新的科技成果转化模式研究[J].科技与创新，2017，4（19）：22-25. |
|
|
|
