|
|
|
| An Analysis on the Ability Evaluation of Scientific Research Talents in Universities Based on Grounded Theory |
| Ma Teng,Zhao Shukuan |
| (School of business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Colleges and universities are important subjects of national economic, scientific and cultural innovation, and research talents are the key to the development of scientific and technological innovation. Scientific research talents in colleges and universities are an important force in promoting the research capacity and improving the teaching level of the university. At present, scientific research talents in colleges and universities are facing the pressure of professional title evaluation and performance appraisal, leading to the undesirable phenomenon that they are forced to only pursue the number of academic achievements and do not care about the academic influence and social value of achievements. Therefore, colleges and universities need to establish a sound scientific talent evaluation method to improve the quality of academic research, and understand the problems and patterns in the practice of research talent management in higher education institutions more clearly.#br#Complex systems management is a holistic approach to understanding, analyzing, and solving practical and complex management problems by integrating knowledge from multiple disciplinary areas and a variety of techniques. Both the behavior of management subject and object, and the environment involved in colleges and universities arequite complex, so it is necessary to analyze the logical relationships between different elements before the study on the evaluation of research talents' ability in universities. This study collects the assessment and evaluation criteria of research talents in different majors and fields from 42 world-class universities in China and selects 10 teachers from world-class universities as interviewees. It utilizes the grounded theory research method to comprehensively sort out and encode the existing implementation methods of scientific research talent assessment and evaluation measures in colleges and universities, refines the conceptual categories and then identifies the logical relationship between the conceptual categories, using Nvivo12 software for open coding, spindle coding, and selective coding to extract relevant concepts and core categories. On the basis of the previous coding, this study analyzes the actual situation of research talents' ability in colleges and universities through the integration of complex system and management disciplines based on Qian Xuesen's complex system management thinking and paradigm, and constructes an analysis framework of research talents' ability in universities. It is found that the ability of scientific research talents in colleges and universities is not only affected by their own knowledge structure, learning motivation, values and other internal factors, but also by various external factors such as resource endowment, discipline construction, incentive mechanism, legal guarantee, team atmosphere and so on, Therefore the analysis framework consists of basic professional quality, teaching ability, research ability, technology developing ability as well as professional practice ability, with different abilities interpenetrating, supporting each other and serving as mutual motivation. #br#The framework can better identify the operation rules and dynamic change processes of research talent analysis in higher education institutions. Thus this study provides theoretical guidance for the evaluation of research talents' ability, talent introduction, resource allocation, and strategic deployment in universities, and it can guide the management innovation of scientific research talents in colleges and universities, realise the healthy and reasonable development of academic ecology, and make great contributions to the economic construction, technological development, and social progress of the whole country. There are also some limitations in the research. It is inevitable that some data are missing or omitted in the process of data collection, which leads to the loss of information. Therefore, there may be some deviations in the concept and category in the induction. Future research will combine the qualitative and quantitative methods to establish the evaluation model of research talents in higher education institutions to better promote the scientific and rational analysis of the ability of scientific research talents in colleges and universities.#br#
|
|
Received: 07 February 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 王洪才.高等教育评价破“五唯”:难点·痛点·突破点[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2021,27(3):44-53.[2] 王少.评价标准怎么立——破“五唯”后的思考 [J].天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021,48(4): 82-87.[3] 人力资源社会保障部.教育部关于深化高等学校教师职称制度改革的指导意见[EB/OL].[2021-07-15].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202101/27/content_5583094.html.[4] TUYTENS M , DEVOS G , VANBLAERE B . An integral perspective on teacher evaluation: a review of empirical studies[J]. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability, 2020, 32(6):153-183.[5] KAO T C, CHEN Y Y, KANG Y N. A study of online tutors' teaching efficacy and effectiveness in eastern Taiwan,China[C] //2015 IIAI 4th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics. IEEE, 2015: 287-290.[6] ZHENG Y, LIU S. Bibliometric analysis for talent identification by the subject-author-citation three-dimensional evaluation model in the discipline of physical education[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2020, 40(1): 62-79.[7] LIANG R, JIANG Z, WANG J. A linguistic neutrosophic multi-criteria group decision-making method to university human resource management[J]. Symmetry, 2018, 10(9): 364-386.[8] 邵沚葭,郝燕君,陈丽丽.基于AHP、熵权法最优集成的高校人才评价体系[J].中国管理信息化,2019,22(3):200-202.[9] 谭雷,庄新田,韩鹏.基于数据挖掘的高校人才科研能力综合评价方法研究[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2014,16(6):596-600.[10] 蔡蕾. 基于OKR模式的我国一流大学建设高校人才评价改革路向研究[J].教育发展研究, 2021, 41(7): 7-12.[11] 童锋, 王兵. “双一流”高校人才分类评价的实践探索与理念重构[J].中国高校科技, 2020,34(11): 31-35.[12] 刘颖.构建多元化创新科技人才评价体系[J].中国行政管理,2019,35(5):90-95.[13] 刘亚静, 潘云涛, 赵筱媛. 高层次科技人才多元评价指标体系构建研究[J].科技管理研究, 2017,37(24): 61-67.[14] 冯·贝塔朗菲. 一般系统论:基础、发展和应用[M]. 林康义，魏宏森，译.北京：清华大学出版社，1987:32-36.[15] 约翰·H·霍兰.适应性造就复杂性[M]. 周晓牧，韩晖，译.上海：科技教育出版社，2019.[16] 钱学森, 于景元, 戴汝为. 一个科学新领域——开放的复杂巨系统及其方法论[J]. 自然杂志, 1990,13(1): 3-10,64.[17] GLASER B G, STRAUSS A L. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research[M]. Somerset: Transaction Pub ,1967:52-56.[18] 范哲. 数字原住民采纳社会化媒体影响因素的扎根研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2017, 38(1): 25-33.[19] CORBIN J M, STRAUSS A L. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory[M]. London: Sage Publications, 2014.[20] 郭宇, 王晰巍, 杨梦晴, 等. 基于扎根理论的网络社群知识共享模式研究 [J].情报资料工作, 2018,39（4): 49-55.[21] 程永林, 刘毅强. 哈佛大学的人才培养战略研究:经验与借鉴 [J].广东外语外贸大学学报, 2013, 24(1): 102-107.[22] 吴雁. 以科技创新为背景的校企科研合作创新机制研究[J].中国高校科技, 2018,32(9): 20-22.[23] 2020上海科技成果转化白皮书[EB/OL].[2021-07-14].http://m.thepaper.cn/baijiahao_13581447.[24] 王丽平, 王俊霞. 包容型人才开发模式对高校科技成果创新质量的影响机制研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(3): 146-153. |
|
|
|
