|
|
|
| How to Build the Cooperation Network of Internal and External Scientific Research in Enterprises：Self-centered or Multi talented |
| Jiang Shuyang,Zhuang Yaming,Liu Xiaqun |
| (School of Economics And Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The technology sources have been narrowing with thedevelopment of the core of global science and technology competition and the trend of anti-globalization. From the perspective of the relationship between science and technology, scientific research is related to the source of technological innovation and guides the next exploration of technological innovation. It is an important way for enterprises to break the "low-end locking". Due to the short-term unpredictability of scientific research results, the prospect of making this long-term strategic decision independently is vague. Enterprises often need to cooperate with external organizations to share the cost and risk of continuous investment. Internal and external scientific research cooperation often exists at the same time, and the trend of rapid interaction between enterprises is becoming more and more obvious, resulting in the threat to the exertion of sustainable competitive advantage of enterprises, and the problem that the simple superposition of innovation quantity has been difficult to adapt to the impact of increasingly complex competitive environment. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore how to efficiently carry out scientific research and improve the quality of innovation..#br#In order to verify the above complex relationship, this papercollects data from three aspects. Firstly, based on the web of science core database, this study sorts out the information of units and authors of 16 316 co-authored papers in the field of information and communication technology (ICT) in China from 2007 to 2016, constructs the internal and external scientific research cooperation network of the enterprise, and calculates the relevant cooperation network indicators. Secondly, the patent application data of the above companies during the sample period is collected on the website of the State Intellectual Property Office. Finally, the basic information and financial data of relevant enterprises are sorted out through CSMAR database. Considering the long time span between scientific research cooperation behavior and innovation output, the internal scientific research cooperation network density and the location characteristics of external scientific research cooperation network are matched with the relevant information of the enterprise based on the three-year mobile window period. Among them, the observation interval of explanatory variable indicators is 2007-2016, the observation interval of explained variable indicators is 2010-2019, and the observation interval of control variables is 2009-2018. Then this study uses hierarchical regression to analyze the comprehensive impact of internal scientific research cooperation network density, external scientific research cooperation network centrality and external scientific research cooperation network structure hole on innovation quality.#br#Through network analysis and regression analysis, this paper investigates the complex relationship between the density of internal scientific research cooperation network, the location characteristics in external scientific research cooperation network and innovation quality. It is concluded that in order to improve the innovation quality of enterprises, it will help to form the coordination of internal scientific research forces and promote the effective accumulation of scientific research knowledge by building a dense internal scientific research cooperation network. The location of the external scientific research cooperation network affects the acquisition of high-quality scientific knowledge, thus affecting the innovation quality of enterprises. There is a nonlinear relationship between the centrality level of the external scientific research cooperation network and the innovation quality of enterprises, and it first increases and then decreases; while occupying the structural hole can have a continuous positive impact on the innovation quality of enterprises. The density of internal scientific research network has an impact on the efficiency of external scientific research cooperation. The dense internal scientific research network alleviates the "double-edged sword" effect of the centrality of external scientific research cooperation, and strengthens the advantage of structural hole.#br#With the focus on the relationship between the density of internal scientific research network, the location of external scientific research cooperation network and innovation quality,this study depicts the scientific knowledge creation and flow mechanism in the process of scientific research cooperation, and enriches the relevant theoretical basis. In addition, the internal and external scientific research cooperation network is introduced into the same research framework, the complex impact of the coupling of internal and surgical research cooperation network on the innovation quality of enterprises and the synergy mechanism of internal and external scientific research cooperation forces are analyzed to provide a scientific basis for the scientific research cooperation management of enterprises.#br#
|
|
Received: 08 June 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] BRANDL J E.Pasteur's quadrant:basic science and technological innovation[J].Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,1998,17(4):734-736.[2] SOH P H,SUBRAMANIAN A M.When do firms benefit from university-industry R&D collaborations? the implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination[J].Journal of Business Venturing,2014,29(6):807-821.[3] ZHANG Y,CHEN K H,ZHU G L,et al.Inter-organizational scientific collaborations and policy effects:an ego-network evolutionary perspective of the Chinese Academy of Sciences[J].Scientometrics,2016,108(3):1383-1415.[4] 裴云龙,郭菊娥,向希尧.企业研发人员合作网络、科学研究与技术创新[J].科学学研究,2016,34(7):1054-1064.[5] KORN H J,BAUM J A C.Chance,imitative,and strategic antecedents to multimarket contact[J].Academy of Management Journal,1999,42(2):171-193.[6] 其格其,高霞,曹洁琼.我国ICT产业产学研合作创新网络结构对企业创新绩效的影响[J].科研管理,2016,37(S1):110-115.[7] 关鹏,王曰芬,傅柱.基于多Agent系统的科研合作网络知识扩散建模与仿真[J].情报学报,2019,38(5):512-524.[8] 贡金涛,王平尧,刘盛博.基于专利合著指标和引用指标的企业科研人员评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(2):161-172.[9] GLGECI I,FERRARIS A,ARSLAN A,et al.European MNE subsidiaries' embeddedness and innovation performance:Moderating role of external search depth and breadth[J].Journal of Business Research,2019,102:97-108.[10] 王海花,孙芹,杜梅,等.长三角城市群协同创新网络演化及形成机制研究:依存型多层网络视角[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(9):69-78.[11] DENICOLAI S,RAMIREZ M,TIDD J.Creating and capturing value from external knowledge:the moderating role of knowledge intensity[J].R&D Management,2014,44(3):248-264.[12] 蔡绍洪,俞立平.创新数量、创新质量与企业效益:来自高技术产业的实证[J].中国软科学,2017，32(5):30-37.[13] GIBBONS M,JOHNSTON R.The roles of science in technological innovation[J].Research Policy,1974,3(3):220-242.[14] CHOI H,SHIN J,HWANG W S.Two faces of scientific knowledge in the external technology search process[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2018,133:41-50.[15] TORTORIELLO M,MCEVILY B,KRACKHARDT D.Being acatalyst of innovation:the role of knowledge diversity and network closure[J].Organization Science,2015,26(2):423-438.[16] CASSIMAN B,DE VEUGELERS R,ARTS S.Mind the gap:capturing value from basic research through combining mobile inventors and partnerships[J].Research Policy,2018,47(9):1811-1824.[17] 闫鑫,孙建军.高知识创造网络中合作关系分布探究[J].情报科学,2017,35(3):117-121.[18] MCFADYEN M A,CANNELLA A A.Social capital and knowledge creation:diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships[J].Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(5):735-746.[19] MASON W,WATTS D J.Collaborative learning in networks[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2012,109(3):764-769.[20] ROTHAERMEL F T,DEEDS D L.Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology:a system of new product development[J].Strategic Management Journal,2004,25(3):201-221.[21] KOGUT B,ZANDER U.Knowledge of the firm,combinative capabilities,and the replication of technology[J].Organization Science,1992,3(3):383-397.[22] BURT R S.Structural holes and good ideas[J].American Journal of Sociology,2004,110(2):349-399.[23] BRESCHI S,CATALINI C.Tracing the links between science and technology:an exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks[J].Research Policy,2010,39(1):14-26.[24] 张明,蓝海林,陈伟宏.企业注意力基础观研究综述:知识基础、理论演化与研究前沿[J].经济管理,2018,40(9):189-208.[25] 刘学元,丁雯婧,赵先德.企业创新网络中关系强度、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(1):30-42.[26] SANNA L J,SCHWARZ N,STOCKER S L.When debiasing backfires:accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology.Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2002,28(3):497-502.[27] SMITH T B,VACCA R,KRENZ T,et al.Great minds think alike,or do they often differ? research topic overlap and the formation of scientific teams[J].Journal of Informetrics,2021,15(1):101104.[28] 孙笑明,崔文田,刘斌,等.中间人对结构洞填充后联合团队创造力的影响[J].管理工程学报,2017,31(3):29-36.[29] 张杰,郑文平.创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么[J].经济研究,2018,53(5):28-41.[30] WIRSICH A,KOCK A,STRUMANN C,et al.Effects of university-industry collaboration on technological newness of firms[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2016,33(6):708-725.[31] LIANG X N,LIU A M M.The evolution of government sponsored collaboration network and its impact on innovation:a bibliometric analysis in the Chinese solar PV sector[J].Research Policy,2018,47(7):1295-1308. |
|
|
|
