|
|
|
| Blockchain Contributes to the Scientific Research Integrity Management:Theoretical Demonstration and System Innovation |
| Yan Qing |
| (School of Humanity and Law, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Although the scientific research integrity management system has been set up, there are some defects such as weak information management, lack of evaluation index, low openness of results, improper application scope and weak supervision. It can not play the ideal effect of restraint. Blockchain is a rapidly developing and effective new technology in recent years. Its advantages of decentralization, data traceability and high security can just make up for the deficiencies of scientific research integrity management system. It can improve the scientific research fairness and management efficiency and reshape the scientific research credit system. Therefore, we need improving the legal system and the ability of information management, building a reasonable evaluation index system, improving the openness of results, adjusting the application scope and strengthening the supervision. Only in this way can we correct the untrustworthy behavior and ensure the development of scientific research activities in good faith.
|
|
Received: 26 May 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] SPJM HORBACH, W HALFFMAN. Promoting virtue or punishing fraud: mapping contracts in the language of “scientific integrity” [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics,2017,23(6):1461-1485.[2] ASHTIANI B A. World map of scientific misconduct[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics,2018,24(5):1653-1656.[3] 曹海军,侯甜甜.区块链技术驱动社会治理创新：价值审视、可能挑战与路径展望[J].东南学术,2020，33(4):103-111.[4] 丁利.制度激励、博弈均衡与社会正义[J].中国社会科学,2016，37(4):135-158，208.[5] 胡元聪.我国法律激励的类型化分析[J].法商研究,2013，56(4):36-45.[6] 温虹,贾利帅.我国高校科研诚信政策研究——基于政策工具的视角[J].中国高教研究,2021，37(4):48-54.[7] 孙平.国外学术出版道德建设最新进展及其启示[J].编辑学报,2021，33(2):49-53.[8] IANSITI M, K R LAKHANI. The truth about blockchain[J]. Harvard Business Review,2017,95(1):118-127.[9] ALFONSO P. Blockchain and IT integration: a systematic survey[J]. Sensors,2018,18(8):25-75.[10] 戚学祥.区块链技术在政府数据治理中的应用：优势、挑战与对策[J].北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）,2018，20(5):105-111.[11] DANIEL DRESCHER. Blockchain basics: a non-technical introduction in 25 steps[M]. New York: Apress, 2017:11.[12] 李大伟,刘建伟,关振宇，等.基于区块链的密钥更新和可信定位系统[J].密码学报,2018，5(1):35-42.[13] GATTESCHI VALENTINA,LAMBERTI FABRIZIO,DEMARTINI CLAUDIO，et al. Blockchain and smart contracts for insurance: is the technology mature enough? [J]. Future Internet,2018,10(2):1-16.[14] 戚学祥,黄新宇.国外区块链发展考察：逻辑、路径与启示[J].河海大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2020，22(6):46-55+111.[15] 张楠,赵雪娇.理解基于区块链的政府跨部门数据共享：从协作共识到智能合约[J].中国行政管理,2020，36(1):77-82.[16] KAAL WULF A, CALCATERRA CRAIG. Crypto transaction dispute resolution[J]. The Business Lawyer,2017,73(6):1-59.[17] 王潺,杨辉旭.智能合约的私法挑战与应对思考[J].云南社会科学,2019，39(4):127-133+187.[18] PIERLUIGI CUCCURU. Beyond bitcoin: an early overview on smart contracts[J]. International Journal of Law & Information Technology,2017,25(3):179-195.[19] 李叶宏.“术”以载“道”：基于区块链技术的科研诚信建设研究[J].自然辩证法研究,2021，37(3):35-41.[20] 王霁霞,尹嘉希.科研不端行为处理程序研究——兼评《科研诚信案件调查处理规则（试行）》[J].科技进步与对策,2021，38(4):1-8.[21] KIURIENE V. Administrative supervision of local self-government as an expression of the rule of law in the context of good governance: the case of Lithuania[J]. Socialiniai Tyrimai,2013,4(3):44-55.[22] 郑戈.区块链与未来法治[J].东方法学,2018，11(3):75-86.[23] 张婷.区块链时代信息服务提供者的责任建构：欧盟《一般数据保护条例》的启示[J].法学,2021，67(3):87-97.[24] 国丽娜,邵世才.科研单位和科研人员的科研信用评价指标和方法研究——从政府视角[J].中国科技论坛,2019，35(2):135-142.[25] 周湘林.高校科研诚信问责机制：归类、现状及其改进[J].现代大学教育,2020，36(5):84-91.[26] MARK ARONSON. The province of administrative law[M]. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997:43.[27] NEIL GUNINGHAN, DARREN SINCLAIR. Regulatory theory: foundations and applications[M]. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 2017:262.[28] 危怀安，韦滨.科研诚信问题的整体性治理[J].科技进步与对策,2019，36(21):106-111. |
|
|
|
