|
|
|
| The Structure and Evolution of Military-Civilian Technological Innovation Cooperation Network：an Empirical Analysis Based on Patent Cooperation and Social Network |
| Li Bing,Zhang Jihai |
| (School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Promoting military-civilian scientific and technological collaborative innovation is an important measure to overcome scientific and technological problems that restrict our country's national defense and economic development. In order to explore the development path of military-civilian science and technology collaborative innovation, we used the data of Beijing’s equipment manufacturing industry to apply for patents jointly by military units, military-industrial units and civilian units from 2000 to 2019, and applied social network analysis and ArcGIS spatial analysis to study the structure and evolutionary characteristics of the military-civilian technological innovation cooperation network. It found that the military-civilian scientific and technological innovation cooperation network of Beijing's equipment manufacturing industry has passed the separation stage of military and civilians, the initial development stage of military-civilian integration, and is now in the early stage of the in-depth development of military-civilian integration. From the perspective of structural characteristics, the scale of innovation cooperation networks is continuously expanding, the density is gradually decreasing, the network structure presents "multi-core" characteristics, and the network is scale-free; from the perspective of spatial distribution, Beijing has frequent cooperation with East and Central South of China, gradually formed a number of military-civilian scientific and technological collaborative innovation connection channels such as Beijing-Shaanxi Province, Beijing-Jiangsu Province, Beijing-Henan Province; from the perspective of core nodes, military universities and military academies are still engaged in the main force of military-civilian scientific and technological research, and has a leading role in the development of military-civilian scientific and technological collaborative innovation.
|
|
Received: 18 February 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] FREEMAN C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues[J]. Research Policy, 1991,20(5):499-514.[2] 严剑峰,包斐.军民融合型国家科技创新系统体系构成与运行研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(22):89-96.[3] 徐辉,许嵩.军民融合深度发展的科技协同创新体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(18):104-108.[4] CHRISTOPHER M S. Towards a comprehensive approach integrating civilian and military concepts of strategy[M]. Rome: NATO Defense College Press, 2011.[5] 房银海, 王磊, 谭清美. 军民融合产业创新平台运行机制与评价指标体系研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2017, 36(12):198-206.[6] KULVE H T, SMIT W A. Civilian–military cooperation strategies in developing new technologies[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(6): 955-970.[7] 周阳, 周冬梅, 丁奕文, 等. 军民融合技术转移的路径演化及其驱动因素研究——“中物技术”2004-2017案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(6): 323-336.[8] LEE F, KOEN F. The evolution of inventor networks in the silicon valley and Boston regions[J]. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 2012, 10(1): 53-71．[9] HOLGER G, TOBIAS H. Public research in regional networks of innovators: a comparative study of four east German regions[J]. Regional Studies, 2009, 43(10): 1349-1368.[10] 李雨浓, 王博, 张永忠,等. 校企专利合作网络的结构特征及其演化分析——以"985高校"为例[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(3):132-140.[11] KIM J, HASTAK M. Social network analysis: characteristics of online social networks after a disaster[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, 38(1):86-96.[12] HERMANS F, SARTAS M, VAN SCHAGEN B, et al. Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling[J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12(2): 1-21.[13] WU J, CHICLANA F, FUJITA H, et al. A visual interaction consensus model for social network group decision making with trust propagation[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2017, 122(15):39-50.[14] LI Z, SUN L, GENG Y, et al. Examining industrial structure changes and corresponding carbon emission reduction effect by combining input-output analysis and social network analysis: a comparison study of China and Japan[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 162:61-70.[15] 杨仲基,王宏起,王珊珊,等.基于动态网络方法的产业专利合作态势研究——以中国石墨烯产业为例[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(9):59-65.[16] JEE S J, SOHN S Y. Patent network based conjoint analysis for wearable device[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, 101(9): 338-346. [17] 杨张博, 高山行. 生物技术产业集群技术网络演化研究——以波士顿和圣地亚哥为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2017，35(4):520-533.[18] 高霞, 陈凯华. 基于SIPO专利的产学研合作模式及其合作网络结构演化研究——以ICT产业为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016，37(11):34-43.[19] 韩增林，袁莹莹，彭飞. 东北地区装备制造业官产学创新合作网络发展演变[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(1): 103-111.[20] 吕国庆, 曾刚, 顾娜娜. 基于地理邻近与社会邻近的创新网络动态演化分析——以我国装备制造业为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2014, 5(5):97-97.[21] 陈瑾宇, 马丽仪, 陶秋燕, 等. 我国芯片产业专利合作网络的结构特性[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(8):102-111.[22] XIE Y P, MAO Y Z, ZHANG H M. Analysis of influence of network structure, knowledge stock and absorptive capacity on network innovation achievements[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011(5): 2015-2019.[23] HUNG C L. Social networks, technology ties, and gatekeeper functionality: implications for the performance management of R＆D projects[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(1): 305-315.[24] BURT R S. Structure holes: the social structure of competition[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1992.[25] WATTS D J. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1999, 105(2): 493-527. |
|
|
|
